The following critique will observe in depth the study from the book Reformation Thought by Alister E. McGrath. The critique will demonstrate that the author, McGrath, looks to talk about the idea, culture, foundation and qualifying surroundings of the Reformation. This book is extensive, which it incorporates the significant players of the Reformation and their religious perspectives. McGrath additionally talks about the social atmosphere encompassing and paving the way to this rebellion against the persecution of the Catholic Church. The book is a critical device for the investigation of the Word of God.
The exchange within …show more content…
Martin Luther taught sola scriptura, that exclusively the Scriptures would be taught by the congregation and that salvation can't be acquired by works, however, by faith in and of itself.
One of the qualities of this content was the profundity by which McGrath tried to outline the extent of the span of the Catholic Church and how it pounded the freedom of thought of men when it went against their precepts and teachings. The following men, for example, William Tyndale, John Huss and John Wycliffe all endeavored to face the congregation. The way in which the Catholic Church enslaved the masses was not a pleasant sight for the eyes.
The second solid purpose of this content was McGrath's exhaustive record of John Calvin. This was yet another man that resisted the force of the papacy. Calvin had a passion of studying Humanism. He stood firm on resisting against the force of the Catholic Church and concluded that the congregation had turned out to be too common and secular. At first Calvin had a different perspective than Martin Luther's position on salvation. Calvin started to embark on further study of Erasmus, another humanist, and from the study it changed his conviction on salvation to later agree with Martin