Helping Them Or Hurting Them

Improved Essays
Reflection Helping Them or Hurting them

During the past years, there has been a lot of material and perspectives regarding the role of aid from developed nations to developing nations. How the undeveloped nations need to look up to the developed ones and follow their lead, do exactly as they did. The common factor about this week’s readings is that every country needs to walk their own path towards development. Here, I would like to emphasize their own path.

For instance, how each underdeveloped nation need the right amount of capital stock aid in order to get out of the poverty trap, a speech that has been around for many years, and until today everything is a continual paradox. But, most developed nations are positive that foreing aids
…show more content…
On the other hand, the ones that did received “help” are the ones still struggling, for instance Africa. Ellerma underlines this issue by explaining the absurdity of this social engineering and the whole inconsistency of the “big push” or “lift-off” idea. It is true if they were able to absorb the “big push” they would certainly not be an underdeveloped nation. l draw attention to the historic and cultural background that shaped these nations and societies. How important it is to let them pursue their own destiny instead of pointing out all their mistakes and problems. How are nations supposed to prosper if they are told everything they do is wrong? Or simply not the right things, according to only the rich nations. Ellerman emphasizes that the ideal solutions are to start from where they are and see things through their eyes, which makes total sense. It is crucial for underdeveloped nations that their autonomy is respected and that their people are motivated to be them not to pretend being some rich nation. Particularly because most of the underdeveloped and developing nations where colonies, with no autonomy or …show more content…
How inappropriate it is to erase some countries history and path because developed nations are set up as example and only what they do is correct. At the same time, the authors emphasize how important it is to respect each country’s autonomy and focus on their assets, their culture their success in order to achieve development. Agencies should stop focusing in the problem and how all is wrong and shift this attention to what their strengths are and how they see the world. Every underdeveloped nations deserves to right their own success story through their own fights and improvements instead of being guided towards an utopia that will never be achieved because it is not based on their culture, necessities and

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    For example, it is considered more crucial to satisfy the needs of the majority, instead of considering every single person in different circumstances. Critics suggest utilitarianism has an inadequate protection of rights due to the constant changes in society and claim everything cannot be measured only by the same standard and assessment of only satisfaction. However, theorists upholding this concept highlight satisfying every person’s needs is not possible. They insisted efficiency will result from decisions based on the majority’s choice on how they would like to be governed and live. Jeremy Bentham supported this notion by stating government cannot meet all the demands placed by the doctrine of natural rights.…

    • 1580 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    We ought to share “scarce resources among all who need them,” yet we don’t abide by those morals (McFague 119). Humans display hypocrisy when wealth and basic necessities are involved. Our current system is the problem that leads to our inhumane attitudes and principles. One must not blame our behaviors because we adopted a view that we only knew and that has always seemed right. Instead, embracing a new model to change the unequal distribution of wealth is a solution offered by…

    • 1100 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    It gives humanity a goal and something to strive towards, so even if a cosmopolitan failed in eradicating all pain, they could be satisfied that they used their time “to decrease world suck” as the Vlogbrothers, John and Hank Green, would say. The worst thing anyone could say about cosmopolitanism in practice is that they tried too hard to make the world a better place and they believed too hard in the goodness of humanity. So if the worst one can say about a moral practice is they tried to get rid of human suffering for everyone and they only succeeded in helping a few, then is it really so bad? Would one object to having their…

    • 1399 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Eggonia has to perform aid to Furasia because negative and positive duties of Van Wyk 's principles which we morally obligated. Our actions should not harm others and our actions should benefit others in any conditions. Wealth countries are benefiting from weak countries ' resources, and the rich country is morally obligated to supply something that benefits the poor countries. Countries are depending on each other, so they have helped each other to flourish. Wealthy countries cannot make a statement like poor countries are deserved to suffer and wealthy countries should isolate them.…

    • 1410 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The moral problem of this is selfishness. This type of society is thinking only of the present rather the future and the effects it has on future generations. This society makes impulse decisions based on their wants instead needs. On the other hand, a society that practices limits and makes choices based on limits is being smart and efficient. The inherent moral problem with acting as if limits don’t exist is quite foolish and only leads to problems with society, especially when it comes to our ecosystem.…

    • 1239 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    These limitations will gradually weaken self- confidence of people. People will forget how to overcome their own destiny. What Machiavelli keeps stressing on is ambition .He apparently expresses the prince can take advantage of his reputation and morality to enrich his nation. In conclusion, Lao Tzu and Machiavelli both expound the ideal type of ruler and government from their viewpoint of human nature and morality. Lao Tzu thinks the Way is the origin of everything.…

    • 1895 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Hobbes believes that a powerful sovereign that is not part of the social contract is the only way to govern people, be in control, and have order in the country; he thinks that because he believes that people will be so fearful of the sovereign and death that they will not cause any problems. However, James Madison, Plato, and Martin Luther King Jr. seem to for the most part disagree with him. I personally disagree with Hobbes, and I agree with Madison, Plato, and King. Hobbes claims that Social unity and Civil peace are established through the commonwealth in the social contract. The State of Nature, in Hobbes’s opinion, is the equal opportunities of ability and desire which creates conflict, which makes people enemies of each others.…

    • 2532 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Neorealist believe that the chances of international cooperation occurring are low because of their main concern, which is power distribution. Neorealist believe that the states are too greedy to cooperate with one another. Neorealist are focused on anarchy, making sure no one can enforce rules, and setting unitary rational actors, the distribution of power, and their main goal is security and survival. Neoliberals agree with neorealist but believe that international cooperation is possible due to their optimistic view. Neoliberals know that the institutions have it flaws, and if they all work together there will be less flaws.…

    • 1658 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    If morality is defined as a demarcation between good and evil, then there must be something to say about the importance of valuing the goodness of one’s nation over its destruction. Having already established that Machiavelli makes decisions that favor the majority, one can conclude that his tactics are indirectly moral. Machiavelli consistently delivers his people the necessary resources in order for his civilization to flourish. It is not that Machiavelli completely disregards morality; he would be foolish to do so. Rather, he values the importance of success, which ultimately leads to goodness.…

    • 1948 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Their theory is justifiable. I do agree that traditions should be preserved, but not to the extreme that they want. This community is adamant that all traditions should never change. Neo fundamentalists each believe that they are living in the correct way, and that everyone else is incorrect. I did not agree with this extreme counter-cosmopolitan view of, “If you don 't want to be my brother, then I 'll smash your skull in.” This is a very group centered thinking, and they do not acknowledge that globalization is beneficial to a certain extent.…

    • 1063 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays