What Is The Cost-Benefit Analysis?

Improved Essays
Previous research has focused on developing theories as to why individuals continue to come to the decision to commit crimes. One of the most influential theories discussing the issue at hand is rational choice theory. This theory, was first introduced by Cesare Beccaria and concluded that offenders often weight the costs and benefits of a crime before committing the deviant act, however, recent ethnographic research suggests otherwise. This research suggests that the cost-benefits analyst is not a static process, therefore indicating that, researchers should possibly consider how an offender’s lifestyle, life situations, and criminal experience influence the subjective value they assign to risks and rewards. An individuals lifestyle definite influences on the value they assign to the risk and reward of a crime. For example, Jacobs and Wright (1999) stated that, “Motivation is the central, yet …show more content…
Obviously, persons commit crimes because they are motivated to do so, and virtually no offense can occur in the absence of motivation” (As cited in Dabney, 2014, p. 150). When an individuals lifestyle is at risk, it can be quite influential on an individual subjective value in which they assign to risk and rewards. For example, Jacobs and Wright (1999) noted that one of the primary motivations for offenders to take part in street robbery were to keep up with appearances. According to Jacobs and Wright (1999), “The open ended pursuit of sensory stimulation was but one way these offenders enacted the imperatives of street culture. No less important was the fetishized consumption of personal, nonessential status enhancing items” (As cited in Dabney, 2014, p. 152). In order to adhere with the code of the

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    The rational choice theory and the classical theory are very similar in their opinions as to why crime is committed. I have always felt, and still feel that crime is committed for the sheer pleasure and gain of the reward versus the risk. Sure, offenders can be caught, charged, convicted and sentenced, but this does not mean that offenders will stop committing crimes forever, which tells us that the rational choice theory may not apply to these offenders, but these would likely be offenders who a serial in nature and committing crimes that are more serious than those that mostly fall under the rational choice theory. I was unable to apply other theories throughout our readings to truly identify the most common reason as to why crime is committed, because it appeared that not only my opinion, but the actual research applied, was able to adequately back-up the true reason, which is personal gain. “Classical theory, people are rational and concerned with minimizing their pain and maximizing their pleasure.” (Cullen, Agnew, Wilcox, 2014, p. 27).…

    • 1616 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    What Classical Criminology expresses here firstly is that individuals in these examples make a rational and deliberate choice of their own volition to commit the crime. Furthermore despite the presence of punishment if they get caught, they have judged the possibility or the strength of both the harms and benefits of their actions and decided to follow through with the criminal act. These individuals are behaving in such a way that they profit through material gain from their indiscretion, progressing their own self-interest. In these ways, Classical Criminology is able to explain the processes by which street crime occurs by exhibiting the hedonistic tendencies individuals incorporate into their actions. However these principles may not be as useful in the interpretation of violent crime,…

    • 1479 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    The central concepts that are the body of Rational Choice Theory are decision-making, choices, present centeredness and the opportunity for committing crime. Success in offending, therefore, with drive and develop criminal characteristics leading to a life of criminality. Failure in offending, on the other hand, will lead to the reduction of criminal activity and eventually desistance (Stogner, 2015). Based on the above concepts, it is obvious to see the relationship between Rational Choice Theory and the Theory of Deterrence. Both Rational Choice Theory and Deterrence Theory state that individuals are hedonistic and are deterred from crime through the implementation of certain, swift and severe punishments; and both also discuss the experiential and emboldening effects attributed to the success of crime or the ineffectiveness of the punishment.…

    • 2124 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Social Learning Theory and Containment Theory both acknowledge that society plays a strong role in crime; however, Containment Theory, being part of the control theory school of thought, also places strong emphasis on the individual and internal factors to explain how some people commit criminal activity while others do not when exposed to the same external forces (Lilly et al., 2015). The real difference in these theories becomes a question of free will. Are people defined simply by their environments and learned behaviors, or is there something internal that steers us in our development? Personally, my opinion most closely coincides with Reckless and his peers among the control theory, but one cannot deny that Akers’ Social Learning Theory has been considered one of the best explanations for crime causation. Using Akers’ theory, if one is able to gather statistical data of an area and take measures to make changes and improve that environment it could reduce the criminal presence in that area by disrupting the criminal element that exists.…

    • 1159 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    They both unswervingly weigh the most significant influences that serve as causations for participation in illicit activities. The Social Disorganization Theory concludes that “crime is largely a product of unfavorable conditions in certain communities” (Gaines and Miller 43). This can be applied directly to criminal justice due to the realization that a large sector of criminals are not inherently bad people. Rather, they are morally equal to any individual, but were simply victims of their environment. If someone is constantly emerged in an atmosphere where horrendous activities are deemed acceptable or even admirable, they are significantly more likely to succumb to similar opportunities.…

    • 1553 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Human nature affects how individuals choose between the consequences of crime and its alternatives, thus, when faced with a choice, individuals choose the preferred course of action (Jacoby, et al. 2012, pp. 226-234). Therefore, frequency of breaking the law is controlled by its consequences (p. 231). Meaning, individuals are more likely to commit crime if they can get away with it.…

    • 1055 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Introduction Rational Choice Theory developed out of classical criminology, a theory developed by Cesare Beccaria (Siegel 2010: 96). Beccaria maintined that people should make their decisions based of fear of being punished, but believed in fair punishment for the crime (Siegel 2010: 96). Rational Choice Theory is a misnomer because it isn’t, in fact, a theory, but a heuristic model (de Haan & Vos 2009:30). A heuristic model can be assessed in terms of how useful it is, but cannot be proven or disproven (de Haan & Vos 2009:30). Rational choice views the process of committing a crime as making a set of choices that result in the crime taking place (Joubert 2014: 15).…

    • 738 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One of which has made people try to lessen their chances of being victimized by the common crimes of burglary. Another is that people are made aware of how crime can arise depending on the opportunity of the things that they are doing. The cons on the other hand have their toll as well. For example, there is no exact explanation of a motivated offender, it is not explained who, how, and why they commit crimes. The purpose of a theory of crime is to be able to explain why they commit the crimes, and in this case they just focus on victimization instead.…

    • 966 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this essay the two criminolgy theories that will be compared and contrasted is the Self- Control theory and the Routine Activity theory. These are two extremely well known and popular theories in the field of criminology today. The Self- Control theory refers to the lack of self-control a person or offender has which can lead that person to commit different crimes. Offenders will commit crimes without even thinking about the consequences. The Routine Activity theory refers to the fact that daily activities or routines people have create perfect chances for crimes to be commited against them and their property.…

    • 1330 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although crimes such as murder, in some cases, are spontaneous or premeditated, more common crimes such as theft or the engaging of drugs can be deterred. In the comic, The Cost of Prison (Jones, Miller-Mark, & Ahrens, 2005), it portrays the suffering of the offender and the community when reentering into society. If one engages in the act of theft, then it assumes that it was a survival instinct. This questions the effectiveness and proportionality in resulting in incarceration for theft and drug use rather than offering an alternative such as resources to assist the problem (e.g., financial concerns, educational programs) or reform institutional policies that initially target vulnerable populations. The same would apply to a person reentering the community with a criminal record.…

    • 1353 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics