Pros And Cons Of Antifederalists

Improved Essays
Show More
As the new government started out for the new and bright future nation, the government was weak and ill controlled. This was replaced with a government that would strengthen the nation completely, but give the government to much power at the federal level. Antifederalists are the main reason that this new government has a Bill protecting people's rights. Antifederalists are a group of famous delegates that defended people's rights from this powerful government.

Every American believed they were entitled to certain rights during the GB era. This belief was betrayed when the King favored other government officials over the citizens.“No person can be held in jail without a quick and speedy trial. And is not deprived of their natural rights, …show more content…
Even before the Articles were created many people believed that their natural and individual rights were a necessity in order to maintain order. This was shown when the Bill Of Rights stated this, “ The right of peoples to be secure in their persons houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and No warrants shall issue but upon probable cause”(Amendment 4). This shows that this amendment is protecting basic rights because many people believe that their personal property is their own and cannot be taken without cause. This ensures that citizens property can not be broken into or searched without consent or a warrant from the court system. Furthermore, The Bill Of Rights shows more of protecting basic rights by amending a few more individual rights. These rights have helped many Americans from being ignored and abused by the strong and powerful government Anti federalists feared.This is stated in the Bill Of rights, “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances”(Amendment 1). This shows that Antifederalists had created this amendment. This, along with the Bill Of Rights was made in

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Central Government Dbq Analysis
    • 392 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Central Government Dbq Analysis

    The Anti Federalist were a group of people who feared that the central government would have entirely too much power. They didn't like the fact that there would be a person incharge of nations. They also feared that the congress would misfortune the…

    • 392 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    The Battle Of The Anti-Federalist Analysis
    • 1064 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Battle Of The Anti-Federalist Analysis

    The idea that one government could express the opinions or understand the will of the people could not be exercised by a government so large. This argument was an attempt to keep governmental control at the state level, where the people were closest to those that represented them. Additionally, Antifederalist’s believed a United States of its current size managed from one central government to be improbable and with the growth potential of the young nation, adequate representation would be nearly impossible without unmanageable numbers of…

    • 1064 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Similarities Between American And Italian Government
    • 1213 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Similarities Between American And Italian Government

    A group of people called anti-federalist wanted to add a bill of right to protect individual rights from a strong and powerful government. After the constitution was created, the government added ten amendments referred to as the bill of right. The first amendment states the citizen have the right to any religion and they have the freedom to express it. Also in the Amendment it states that the government can not…

    • 1213 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Federalist Shard Anti Federalists
    • 130 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Federalist Shard Anti Federalists

    Although the Federalist shard many of the same ideas of the Antifederalist such as individual rights (Oaks 223). The Anti-Federalists shared different view on how the government should be ran. Because of their experiences with the tyranny of Great Britain, they feared the establishment of a strong national government. The Anti-Federalists also did not accept the use of separation of powers and checks and balances, because they feared the branches of government would abuse the power and not serve the purpose of protecting the rights and freedoms of the individuals. It was evident in the way they thought things should be ran and why they thought they where right, being that they where from a old-line of republicans and did not favor a system…

    • 130 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Essay On Shay's Rebellion
    • 809 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Essay On Shay's Rebellion

    Anti-Federalists feared a powerful government would oppress the people. They argued that the new constitution was too much like the powerful British Monarchy. Anti-federalist thought the power should remain with the states and local governments.…

    • 809 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Constitution Of 1787: Limiting Power Of The States
    • 559 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Constitution Of 1787: Limiting Power Of The States

    They believed that a strong central government would produce tyranny, which was exactly what they had recently escaped from. This new government would produce an increase in taxes, obliterate the states, form dictators, favor the wealthy, and destroy individual freedoms. Antifederalists wanted strong state governments and weak federal governments. They felt that the only way to protect the rights of the people was by a Bill of Right. They did not trust the government with their freedoms and wanted an assurance that their rights were preserved.…

    • 559 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Ratifying The Constitution Dbq
    • 924 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Ratifying The Constitution Dbq

    Despite the majority of the citizen’s opinion, the Anti-Federalists were still concerned about the Bill of Rights, and the preservation of certain rights of the people; such as trial by jury, freedom of speech, and other basic rights. They also express their thought on the power of the central government in the United States; saying that a nation as large as the Unite States could not be possibly controlled by one national government even though the constitution have granted them power. Despite the Anti-Federalists unity in opposing the ratification of the constitution, they could not come to an agreement on an alternative to operate the government. This made them…

    • 924 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    John Locke Social Contract Analysis
    • 638 Words
    • 3 Pages

    John Locke Social Contract Analysis

    American’s founders who transfer some of their rights to the government through establishing the United States Constitution in 18th centuries, while the Americans can still propose any reasonable amendment upon the Constitution. The US Constitution clearly delineated the national framework of government, including providing protection of life and property like natural rights to life, liberty and estate of the Americans, formulating the doctrine of the separation of powers and identifying the rights and responsibilities of state governments. For instance, the First Amendment of the United States Constitution stated clearly that the individual liberty and rights should be guaranteed by the government and without any interference, including freedoms of religion, expression and petition, which guarantee Americans possess right to hold different religious beliefs freely, and the…

    • 638 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Explain Some Historical Court Cases That Violated The Bill Of Rights
    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Explain Some Historical Court Cases That Violated The Bill Of Rights

    The first amendment of the Bill of Rights includes freedom of speech, right to petition, assembly, religion and freedom of expression. The Bill of rights was created for the anti-federalists who didn’t want to ratify the constitution because it didn’t directly state the rights of citizens. In 1735 there was a court case, Crown vs John Peter Zenger, that brought John…

    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Anti Federalism Pros And Cons
    • 390 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Anti Federalism Pros And Cons

    Some of America’s finest minds got together for the Philadelphia convention to figure out which form of government would be best. The Federalists were formed by Alexander Hamilton and its other well-known members were Benjamin Franklin, John Jay, George Washington, and James Madison. Federalists desired a secure central government and feeble state governments, preferred the Constitution to aid the amount owed and stress of the American Revolution, were against the Bill of Rights, and were supported in large urban areas. Meanwhile, the Anti-federalists were composed by Patrick Henry, John Hancock, Richard Lee, George Mason, and Mercy Warren. Anti-federalists insisted that power in the states not in the central government, picked the Articles…

    • 390 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    American Revolution Dbq
    • 1328 Words
    • 6 Pages

    American Revolution Dbq

    Two groups that played a key role were Federalists and Anti-Federalists. Federalists believed in having a strong central government, whereas Anti-Federalists waned the majority of the power given to the people and were wary of the government having too much control. These groups are similar to Authoritarians and Libertarians of today’s society, respectively. In fact, these group’s differing beliefs sparked one of the disagreements surrounding the Constitution, “One of the many points of contention between Federalists and Anti-Federalists was the Constitution’s lack of a bill of rights that would place specific limits on government power. Federalists argued that the Constitution did not need a bill of rights, because the people and the states kept any powers not given to the federal government.…

    • 1328 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Anti Federalists Pros And Cons
    • 711 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Anti Federalists Pros And Cons

    Federalists and Anti-Federalists The feud between the Federalist and Anti-Federalist party was based on the ratification of the Constitution. Even though both groups believed that the principal purpose of government is to secure individual rights and that the best instrument for that purpose is some form of limited republican government. They also agreed that the individual has the right to do anything that the government has no power to keep him from doing.…

    • 711 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Decent Essays

    Compare And Contrast Federalist And Anti Federalists
    • 306 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Compare And Contrast Federalist And Anti Federalists

    The Federalist vs Anti-federalist fight took place during a very important time for our country. Before the US Constitution was ratified, (a constitution that gave more power to the federal government), Anti-federalists decided to act out and protest the state of the constitution. Anti-federalists feared that if America gave too much power to the federal government, we would end up just like Britain again, with no say in a corrupt government. However, not everyone felt this way. There were also a large group of Federalists; people that favored the newfounded federal government in the constitution.…

    • 306 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Pros And Cons Of Anti Federalists
    • 409 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Pros And Cons Of Anti Federalists

    The Anti-federalists believe that the Federalists made up or overstated a lot of the problems they say are in the government. They don’t think it’s safe to start a new and never tested government that they aren’t positive it will work. Many Anti-federalists prefered Agrarian Republicanism, a government made around land owning farmers who participate in local politics. They Wanted the government to be equal to everyone in each state, not slaves obviously, because they wanted poor people and others to be able to have an equal say in what happens in their government and not have to powerful of a…

    • 409 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Federalist Vs. Anti-Federalists
    • 1080 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Federalist Vs. Anti-Federalists

    This would allow for the government to do things that aren't listed within the Constitution. The Anti-Federalists were opposed to this. They wanted a strict interpretation of the Constitution. Some examples of Anti-Federalists are George Mason and John Hancock. Anti-Federalists by definition are a political party that wanted the power of the individual state to be greater than the power of the central government, and a strict interpretation of the constitution promoted this.…

    • 1080 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More

Related Topics

Ready To Get Started?
Discover
Company
Follow
©2024 Cram.com
Privacy Policy |  About Ads |  Site Map |  Advertise  | 
  • Cookie Settings