Progressive Ideas Have Killed Free Speech On Campus By Wendy Kaminer Summary

Improved Essays
Many people today say that we are fragile compared to past generations. In Wendy Kaminer’s “Progressive Ideas Have Killed Free Speech on Campus”, she argues that because of this fragileness we are now censoring words that when used in the correct context should not be censored at all as it limits our freedom of speech. She builds the credibility in her argument by including a story she researched from the 1980s of a law professor and writer and utilizes the emotional appeal of her anger to help direct the audience to see her point of view of the argument and agree with it, but her argument is very opinion based and is not backed up by any citable facts or statistics consequently making her argument weaker. Kaminer starts off the article by

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Navneet Kaur English 120 Wendy Hayden November 1, 2017 Erwin Chemerinsky’s article “Hate speech is protected from free, even on college campuses” is a response to professor Robert’s C. Post on why all sorts of opinions should be expressed on college campuses, regardless of their offense and unpopularity. As students are disrespected by the thoughts of most conservative speakers, colleges have to shell out thousands of dollars for student safety and to allow speakers to deliver their ideas without any trouble. Chemerinsky, who taught law at UC Irvine, experienced this attitude when his students believed that school officials had the right to limit hate speech. As opposed to Post, Chemerinsky believes that hate speech should be addressed if…

    • 285 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The wrongful prosecution of “a white student guilty of racial harassment for reading a book titled Notre Dame vs. the Klan” (LG 5) should raise an alarm that we punish those who education themselves to recognize and prevent the reoccurrence of heinous historical acts. Society has initiated a movement that “sought to restrict speech (specifically hate speech aimed at marginalized groups), but it also challenged the literary, philosophical, and historical canon, seeking to widen it by including more-diverse perspectives” (LG 2). Limiting speech of any form is a violation of freedom of speech. Speech should be moderated to respect individual values, not to avoid uncomfortable topics. The purpose in higher education is to enlighten students and provide knowledge that creates understanding and tolerance of…

    • 733 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Freedom of speech has been an integral part of American society ever since the founding fathers gathered in Philadelphia to create the nation’s fundamental laws. The first amendment of the Constitution guarantees every American citizen the right to freedom of speech. In recent years, questions have arisen about whether free speech should be regulated, specifically on college campuses. Are college students too sensitive to handle issues brought up in free debate? Two articles that address this issue are “Millennials Will Soon Define ‘America,’ and That’s a Problem for Ideas” by Julie Lythcott-Haims and “Today’s Students Have a New Way of Looking at Free Speech” by Kathleen McCartney.…

    • 927 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    University students who insist on censorship by a college administration when a topic, issue or idea causes them emotional distress, effectively denies all who participate in the academic setting the basic right of freedom of speech in a venue that should be open to free exchanges of ideas. To take away topics that give them emotional stress, students have come up with a solution to the issue, trigger warnings. According to Jonathan Haidt and Greg Lukianoff’s The Coddling of the American Mind, trigger warnings are alerts for professors to give their students if trauma-trigging material is going to be taught (Haidt and Lukianoff 44). These trigger warnings fall under the category microagressions.…

    • 1517 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Reid and Nuefeld once said "It takes a village to raise a child, but it takes only one complaint to raze a curriculum". The idea of placing a book on a closed shelf is in its most basic form, censorship, the one thing US constitution was supposed to protect from. But even without using a hedgemonical argument that US is always right, one can simply look to recent examples of censorship and how its presence harms the core value of human capital:knowledge. In reality regulating language destroys the hope of true emancipation, we must be able to resignify derogatory terms to defuse their injurious abilities. Judith Butler's charges that in advocating speech codes, censorship, and other regulatory approaches to linguistics, hate speech theorists destroy "something fundamental about language and, more specifically, about the subject's constitution in language".…

    • 1338 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    citizen’s right to free speech. If trigger warnings were established to help students feel secure, then why does it repress the teaching abilities of college professors? The idea that in an educational setting, we as students as well as the teachers cannot express our feelings is preposterous. Now there are moments when people will try to take advantage of free speech and deliberately hurt others through words, but not all words should be censored. Students take small comments to be offensive, yet they may make a comment about someone else with ease; Mike Bloomberg provides an excellent example of why our freedom of speech should be justified without any restrictions as he says “What I do may offend you.…

    • 1752 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    The ultimate aim, it seems, is to turn campuses into “safe spaces” where young adults are shielded from words and ideas that make some uncomfortable. And more than the last, this movement seeks to punish anyone who interferes with that aim, even accidentally. You might call this impulse vindictive protectiveness. It is creating a culture in which everyone must think twice before speaking up, lest they face charges of insensitivity, aggression, or worse.’ That is not the purpose of giving trigger warnings.…

    • 1029 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Colleges campuses, once a beacon for progressive reforms, stimulating discussions, and engaging debates, recently have been scrubbed clean of language that may be perceived as offensive or hurtful to minority students through the use of speech codes. Speech codes seek to protect the mental health of college students, and punish harassment that occurs on campus, however because of their ambiguous wording, they have been stretched to censor unpopular opinions and important discussions. By protecting students from all words or displays that may cause offense, colleges are not adequately preparing students for life in the working world, and inadvertently presenting students with a sheltered and unchallenged world view. In an attempt to create “safe…

    • 1379 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Trying to change someone's opinion is like trying to sell someone a car. You need to sell them on your argument and prove that it is better than its competitors. A good salesman knows that they have to use; informative facts, shocking statistics, riveting stories and most importantly persuasive language. A persuasive writer is basically a salesman in disguise. Similar to selling a car, a writer has to sell the reader on their arguments and personal writing style.…

    • 1094 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As a Millennial, I can testify to having overly-cautious and more protective parents than my parents experienced. After speaking to my parents, they also fully agree with this statement, largely in part to increasing media coverage and knowledge as to what is, and is not, beneficial or safe for children. The authors go on to describe how trigger warnings prevent the expansion of new ideas and proper education. I completely agree with this, as students cannot learn with the censored lectures and speeches given on college campuses; students need to hear differing ideas and opinions to expand their knowledge and formulate their own opinions. “The Coddling of the American Mind” also explains how trigger warnings make the problems of over-censoring and hypersensitivity worse by spreading fear and fostering a thinking style that harbors anger and resentment.…

    • 953 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In March 2015 Sherman Alexie’s book found itself banned from a middle school curriculum in the city of Waterloo, Iowa because one parent made a complaint about profanity and sexual references in the book. The school said that since the complaint was not “formally” made, they did not have to follow their own policy and assemble a review committee for the matter. The teachers tried to fight against the ban, but the superintendent simply said, “It’s done” and the book was removed. It may seem that the people trying to censor these books are only trying to help, but censorship is a real and serious problem that needs to be fixed. One way that it can be fixed is support given…

    • 1694 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Infantilizing College College campuses across the U.S. have initiated change, and it’s not the tuition and costs of textbooks, it’s the elimination of anything considered controversial from classrooms and curriculum. A shift is being made to rid college campuses of offensive, racial, or sexist material and topics. In the September 2015 issue of The Atlantic, authors Greg Lukianoff and Jonathan Haidt poignantly title their article “The Coddling of the American Mind” and investigate why U.S. college students are demanding censorship in their studies and “trigger warnings” on the syllabus’ (Lukianoff and Haidt). A crusade is taking place across college campuses everywhere to rid subject matter and discussions of issues that may be regarded as…

    • 1094 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The First Amendment protects citizen’s rights to free speech. The First Amendment is “applied to the states through the Fourteenth Amendment, restricts governmental interference with citizens’ free expression rights” (McCarthy, Cambron-McCabe, & Eckes, 2014, p. 93). However, students’ right to free speech in the educational setting can be limited if “the expression is likely to disrupt the educational process or collide with the rights of others” (McCarthy et al., 2014, p. 98). The Supreme Court applies the First Amendment in many cases regarding free speech. Through these various cases, the Supreme Court has established four legal principles to guide student expression rights in public educational facilities (McCarthy et al., 2014, p. 95).…

    • 701 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Freedom of speech is a privilege all Americans share. A person can state whatever they please, so long as it doesn’t cause a clear and present danger, without government interference. The idea that someone can legally think, be, and say whatever they want is what lead millions of immigrants to form the U.S. back in 1776 and is the same reason people fight for their right to live here today. Thanks to information being so accessible in this digital age, individuals are told that they are allowed and to study and form an educated opinion. This comes with one catch.…

    • 975 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The topic of free speech on college campuses currently has been a huge hot button issue in the media, especially in the United States. The controversy this topic brings is deeply rooted in the history of not only higher education, but in the history of the development of this country. Often people are all for freedom of speech, until someone speaks out against them (as a person) or one of their core beliefs. In an effort to give full disclosure here, I believe that I should state that directly after I completed my undergraduate degree I did apply and got into Law School. While I decided not to attend Law School, I do believe that the courses I took on Pre-Law and Constitutional Law had a profound impact on my beliefs.…

    • 750 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays