Political Parties In The 1790s

Improved Essays
Partisan Politics occurs when one political party does not agree with another political party and is unwilling to compromise his political beliefs. The year 1790 was the birth year of partisan politics in the United States just as Washington’s presidency was coming to a close. The two factions emerging would be the Federalists in support of Alexander Hamilton and those opposing were the Democratic-Republicans that were led by Thomas Jefferson and James Madison. The Federalists believed in a strong central government that centered around the rich and elite, along with a need for economic growth. The Republicans believed that a strong central government would only oppress or restrict the rights of citizens. The republicans wanted to protect the rights of individual states, along with its citizens and believed that government should represent the majority such as farmers or the “working man,” therefore a strong central government would allow too much power to a single person.
The republicans had a very strict interpretation of the constitution; they read the constitution literally in order to keep the government honest. Evidence of this is shown in Jefferson’s opinion written in the “Debate on the First National Bank.” While the Federalists were for the National Bank and Alexander Hamilton argued the constitutionality of the bank upon the basis of the
…show more content…
The Republican Party adopted these views based on the evidence that presented itself in the way the federal government was operated. We saw this in the violations of the First and Tenth Amendments. Jefferson’s goal was to do the right thing for the individual states, along with its citizens and fought to do so as he witnessed the corruption that came along with a strong central

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Each party assumed that the victory of the oppose would lead to the demise of the nation. Federalists feared that Jefferson would undo their contributing accomplishments of the past twelve years (Digital History). In their eyes, a Republican president would bend the Constitution to his likings to his own party. A Republican’s…

    • 968 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The Republicans were in favor of greater government intervention in both economic and social issues. They were usually protectionists. In contrast, the Democrats had a strong base among Catholics, poorer farmers, and people who supported free trade as well as other free market policies. In addition, Democrats also favored small government and…

    • 114 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    How did the elections of 1796 and 1800 show the political divides between the Federalists and the Democratic Republicans? In 1792 John Adams became president and he was in the Federalist Party. The Federalists supported the proposed constitution. In 1800 Thomas Jefferson became president as a Democratic-Republican.…

    • 261 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Anti Federalsit Analysis

    • 300 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The federalist felt that a strong central government was vital for us. Federalsit also wanted to ratify the constitution as quick as possible. They said “In the republican government, the legislative authority necessarily predominates”, which means that the government has more power over the states government. The federalist…

    • 300 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The parties of the 1860 election consisted of the Democrat party and the Republican party. The issue of slavery was a driving force behind many aspects of the parties’ respective platforms. Each party also had ideas of their own on what the United States should progress towards next. The Democratic Party of 1860 platform addressed expansion into new frontiers, foreign threats, and the issue of slavery.…

    • 364 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although George Washington opposed political parties, political parties began to form in the 1790s during his administration due to the disputes between Thomas Jefferson and Alexander Hamilton. Alexander Hamilton felt that the Excise tax and the National Bank were good Economic plans to fix the nation's debt problem; however, Jefferson believed the National Bank to be unconstitutional under his ‘strict’ interpretation of the Constitution and the Excise tax to be despicable. Hamilton also supported the Sedition and Alien Acts which were intended to cripple the Democratic-Republicans. Jeffersonians felt these acts were a direct attack on the liberties given to the people in the First Amendment of the Constitution. Federalists also ruled in the…

    • 166 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In American history, few ideological disagreements have been as important as the divide between Alexander Hamilton 's Federalist Party and Thomas Jefferson 's Democrat-Republicans. Both parties were led by brilliant men whose political arguments would lay the foundation for debates on the nature of government in America that are ever present in our national discourse. Hamilton thought America should drive ahead into the future as an industrial and mercantile powerhouse, whereas Thomas Jefferson felt that America 's greatness lied in the "yeoman farmer" and the agrarian traditions he represented. Both sought the best path forward for the young American nation and both would have a chance to put their theories to the test in their capacities as ministers in the Washington Administration…

    • 1504 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When the Constitution was written in 1787 no one had expected the arisal of political parties. The first president of the United States, George Washington, even warned against “the danger of parties in the State” in his farewell address (Washington 1796). Yet, in what seemed like no time, two very different political parties had risen. The first of these parties to be created was the Federalist party which was lead by such men as Alexander Hamilton; The second party, which was created to oppose the Federalist party, was the Jeffersonian Democrat-Republican party. This party was headed mainly by Thomas Jefferson.…

    • 633 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Domestic controversies in the 19th century, forced Americans to align themselves with a political party, hindering national unity. George Washington reasoned that: “However [political parties] may now and then answer popular ends… unprincipled men will be enabled to subvert the power of the people and to usurp for themselves the reins of government.” Here, Washington foresees the political dissention that will ensue nearly a century later, and the men who will subsequently abuse their attained power. The Antebellum period encompasses the years between the War of 1812 and the Civil War. Slavery, immigration, and economics served as chief battleground issues for antebellum political parties.…

    • 457 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Thomas Jefferson believed in a strict interpretation of the U.S Constitution. On the other hand, his opponent Alexander Hamilton believed in the loose interception of the U.S Constitution. The republicans believed that the government should be decreased in person. Besides that, Jefferson tried to minimize the federal control by reducing its scope and reach. However, there were advantages and disadvantages to the Louisiana Purchase for President Jefferson.…

    • 765 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    With respect to the federal Constitution, the Jeffersonian Republicans are usually characterized as strict constructionists who were opposed to the broad constructionism of the Federalists. To what extent was this characterization of the two parties accurate during the presidencies of Jefferson and Madison? As war wages on in Europe, economic and political influence is spreading to America. As the President’s, Jefferson and Madison are challenged by upholding their country’s honor and putting their beliefs into action.…

    • 856 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Federalists abandoned their principles of democracy that were established within the Declaration of Independence. Jefferson, author of the Declaration of Independence, wrote “all men are created equal…” Jefferson opposed his words severely during his term. For instance, Jefferson “bought, bred, flogged and sold slaves while calling slavery “an abominable crime” and “unremitting despotism.” Jefferson contradicted himself by participating within the criminalistics activities and never freeing the slaves because he was too dependent on their forced harsh labor. (Shi, David E and Tindall, George B. America: A Narrative History.…

    • 908 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nash's Argument Analysis

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages

    come to the same conclusion that the founding fathers were commoners in almost cult-like Americanistic view, which echoes the mythic sense of the founding that Nash describes in his quote. It is historically proven to argue Nash’s point further that the framers were almost all very materially and societally elite, they knew that if they did not guard against rebellion, their country could be taken by the same violent mob that toppled the British elite. The elite framers needed a way to pay for the war for a country that did not exist yet. America was the first country to divide itself from its mother country that formed itself into an entirely new state.…

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In 1787, the Continental Congress was brought together in the Philadelphia Convention to revise the Articles of Confederation. The Constitution was written and since people had different views on how to interpret it, two political parties were eventually formed: The federalists and the Democratic-Republicans. The main reason for the rise of political parties during the 1790s was because each of the parties favored different political and economical reforms needed as a new, developing country. Alexander Hamilton led the Federalists and they favored a loose interpretation of the Constitution, while Thomas Jefferson and the Democratic-Republican Party favored strict interpretation. The Federalists wanted to create a national economy by creating…

    • 1488 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    AJ Siciliano, Federalists Vs. Anti-Federalists Essay Before the ratification of the constitution, two original political parties fell consistent during the 1700’s, Federalists and Antifederalists. In shorter terms, Federalists wanted a stronger central government to have overall power of the states, rather the Antifederalists wanted something similar to the Articles of Confederation, where the states as individuals, had more power than the central government. Both, although strongly contrasting, contained one main similarity, thirst for the creation of a new country, just with different ideas of how it should function.…

    • 1080 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays