come to the same conclusion that the founding fathers were commoners in almost cult-like Americanistic view, which echoes the mythic sense of the founding that Nash describes in his quote.
It is historically proven to argue Nash’s point further that the framers were almost all very materially and societally elite, they knew that if they did not guard against rebellion, their country could be taken by the same violent mob that toppled the British elite. The elite framers needed a way to pay for the war for a country that did not exist yet. America was the first country to divide itself from its mother country that formed itself into an entirely new state. With this we as country treaded new ground into many fabrications of many taxation laws …show more content…
They knew that the Constitution and the subsequent Bill of Rights, which would represent the placement of the underclass people in the political discussion, had to be made vague. One of the founding members of the Democratic-Republicans, James Madison, knew that his documents would be looked at for years to come and in his wording was very vague in his Virginia plan, its ultimate revision, and the 10 amendments to it. This vagueness brought about different ideological views of its place in the under classed lives. Madison and Jefferson for the limitation of the government for the under classed people to receive equally footing in the political republic which came to be known as the Democratic-Republicans. George Washington and James Monroe on the other hand, created the Federalist party, who believed in the heavily government orientated nation and the limitation of power toward the mob-like lower classes. The federalists were not a liked political party due to leave not wanting to leave aristocratic tendencies to return to a British type rule, so with their desolation America had fully attained its own political identity without any previous examples. The splintering of the Democratic-Republicans that followed to Federalists falling out of power would birth the beginnings of the political party system. This system had to eventually evolve from the Fathers’ aristocratic ideal of aristocracy into the more all-inclusive society we live in
It is historically proven to argue Nash’s point further that the framers were almost all very materially and societally elite, they knew that if they did not guard against rebellion, their country could be taken by the same violent mob that toppled the British elite. The elite framers needed a way to pay for the war for a country that did not exist yet. America was the first country to divide itself from its mother country that formed itself into an entirely new state. With this we as country treaded new ground into many fabrications of many taxation laws …show more content…
They knew that the Constitution and the subsequent Bill of Rights, which would represent the placement of the underclass people in the political discussion, had to be made vague. One of the founding members of the Democratic-Republicans, James Madison, knew that his documents would be looked at for years to come and in his wording was very vague in his Virginia plan, its ultimate revision, and the 10 amendments to it. This vagueness brought about different ideological views of its place in the under classed lives. Madison and Jefferson for the limitation of the government for the under classed people to receive equally footing in the political republic which came to be known as the Democratic-Republicans. George Washington and James Monroe on the other hand, created the Federalist party, who believed in the heavily government orientated nation and the limitation of power toward the mob-like lower classes. The federalists were not a liked political party due to leave not wanting to leave aristocratic tendencies to return to a British type rule, so with their desolation America had fully attained its own political identity without any previous examples. The splintering of the Democratic-Republicans that followed to Federalists falling out of power would birth the beginnings of the political party system. This system had to eventually evolve from the Fathers’ aristocratic ideal of aristocracy into the more all-inclusive society we live in