Plato's Argument On Death

Improved Essays
Death is feared by many, yet in other communities death is celebrated with festivities. It is important that we form our own understanding of death and how it affects us because without an answer to the question “what happens after we die,” we live in fear for our entire lives when we should be enjoying the time we have in this life. The only way we can hope to find a solution to the previously mentioned question is by questioning our existence through philosophy. By this method we may find peace in the answers we find and even if we do not, we deepen our understanding on topics such as death. However, Plato’s argument in the “Phaedo” that ‘one should not be afraid of death because the fear of death would be claiming to know something we do not really know’ is a weak argument. Plato’s argument hinges on his claim that the fear is motivated by a false knowledge of an unpleasant afterlife; however, most people’s fear is spurred by the antithesis …show more content…
He is saying that we know nothing about what comes after death, so we can not judge what we do not know. It is not ok for us to be afraid of death, because we are unaware of what it really is. However, not knowing anything about death, is what makes it ok to be afraid. We call this apprehension and it is typically a sign of intelligence rather than irrationality. People do not know what is to come in the afterlife, making it scary. Our understanding of death molds how we live our lives. If a person feels the cure to life is death then he may as well end his life, which is no way to live. On the other hand, if a person approaches death with a slight fear then he will work hard while he is on the earth and will cherish the moments that are guaranteed to him. What is important for society is that everyone is comfortable with how they view death -- whether it’s through fear or through

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    In the two texts that we read in class, Plato, Phaedo, and Lucretius, Nature of Things, both Socrates and Lucretius try to reassure us that we should not be afraid of death. In Plato, Phaedo, Phaedo is telling the story of Socrates’s final hours from being their first hand. In Lucretius, Nature of Things, Lucretius’s telling his view on religious issues and how he got to his view, poetic skills, and study on scientific phenomena. Both Socrates and Lucretius have different arguments on why we should not be afraid of death. Socrates and Lucretius would have their own responses to each other 's argument if they were to reply to each other.…

    • 1540 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Deathless Soul in Plato’s Phaedo In his dialogue, the Phaedo, Plato offers justification for the immortality of the soul. Plato does this through an argument many have referred to as the “final argument.” I will explicitly make sure that the arguments are clearly expressed and explained. First, I will discuss some of the key features of the previous three arguments in the Phaedo.…

    • 1081 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to Socrates, you should not be afraid of death because the afterlife…

    • 966 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As Plato says famously stated, “For the fear of death is indeed the pretense of wisdom, and not real wisdom, being a pretense of knowing the unknown; and no one knows whether death, which men in their fear apprehend to be the greatest evil, may not be the greatest good,” (Apology; 9). We should attempt to decrease society’s fear of death, and rather embrace it for those who already have. There are so many aspects of PAD that should be discussed, ranging from why people would want to use it as a way to end their suffering, what people would qualify for PAD, and why people would be a proponent of it and why they would argue against it. It is essential to consider normative ethics when considering a viewpoint on any topic that may be morally charged.…

    • 245 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the “Apology” Socrates is on trial for crimes he has not committed. Socrates ultimately does not fear death because of his innocence, he believes that death is not feared because it may be one of the greatest blessings of the soul. For a person such as Socrates that has lived virtuously there no reason for them to fear death. Socrates makes the argument that one should not fear death because only the gods know what is beyond death,because death could be a blessing. According to Socrates, “I had at the risk of death, like anyone else, remained at my post where those you had elected to command had ordered me, and then, when the god ordered me, as I thought and believed, to live the life as a philosopher, to examine myself and others,…

    • 934 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Eventually death will come to us all, but death itself is still unknown to every living person. No one has ever died and returned to give a clear account about what death is really like. It is said that it is man’s nature to fear what they do not understand and cannot control. We can never know precisely what death is unless we die, therefore we can never understand it while living. When looking at the sociological approach towards death we come across ‘death-denying’.…

    • 1022 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Survival of the self is a consistent question which has punctuated human thought throughout time. Whether embodied or disembodied, survival of the soul seems to be dependent on forces that humans do not have the technology to scientifically prove right now. The most plausible stance about life after death is no personal survival. To prove this, first, I will describe the arguments for personal survival, which I oppose, and then present an argument based on the unintelligibility of souls with Sosa’s “Spatial Awareness” debate. A criticism for this will be presented that uses a rebuttal against Sosa.…

    • 1527 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    There are many explanations within our grasp of why Socrates accepted his death in Plato’s The Last Days of Socrates. It often comes as a surprise to those reading the dialogue Crito, after gaining knowledge of the type of rebellious character that Plato portrays Socrates to be, that Socrates reveals his admiration and loyalty to the state and the laws which govern societies. This explanation plays a key role in his willingly accepting death which will feature greatly in my essay. I will also address other explanations such as his utilitarian approach to obeying laws, martyrdom and the immortality of the soul.…

    • 1431 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Socrates states in the Apology, “To fear death … is no other than to think oneself wise when one is not, to think one knows what one does not know” (29a). Fearing death is a form of ignorance. Socrates demonstrates he is not afraid of death because he does not have all the information to base his opinion of death. In addition, Socrates does not fear death because he is excited for the fact that he may continue his search for truth by examining the souls of the dead. Death may be a blessing in disguise or a curse.…

    • 909 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Similarly, some sections Socrates’s case on the fear of death dwell on personal opinions of the philosopher. Subsequently, for an argument to remain sound and valid, all the section of the idea should be based on facts and logic as opposed to the personal opinions that do not have a rational basis. Even so, the formal and quantitative way of measuring the fear of death, the grandest blessing as death, as well as the good or evil associated with death does not exist. In the same way, no parameter is available to ascertain the measurement to prove or disapprove faith from the perspective of embracing death while not fearing the unknown. As Socrates purports in his argument not to fear death, the way of thinking and his opinion would not aid in confronting his mortality.…

    • 1190 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In the Phaedo, Plato provides several arguments in an attempt to prove the immorality of the soul. In this essay, I will focus on his Final Argument, which describes the Forms as causes, subject to destruction or displacement when the particular undergoes some change. Next, I will show how Socrates applies these ideas to argue for the immortality of the soul. Finally, I will present a few reservations I have about the validity of this argument.…

    • 1675 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to his speech “ To fear death, gentlemen, is no other than think oneself wise when one is not, to think one knows what one does not know” (29a, p9). By this, he is implying that death is a mystery that is hard to understand, but is not to be feared. Socrates supports this idea by saying, “No one knows whether death is may not be the greatest of blessings for a man, yet man fear it as if they knew that it is the greatest of evils” (29a, p9). According to Socrates, people see mortality as something bad; even they have no knowledge about it. They claim so because they are scared of it.…

    • 1157 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Plato’s Phaedo presents the final conversation of Socrates preceding his execution by poison, discussing death, the afterlife, and the pursuit of philosophy. In this dialogue, Socrates explains what it means for one to die, and the strong association philosophy has with death, that is, philosophy as the preparation and even the living out of death. Socrates is prepared to die because of his practice of philosophy which causes him to suppress bodily desires, therefore, ready to leave his body behind for the afterlife. He does not have a fear of death, but looks forward to it, because of its effects on the soul. Despite accepting death and even looking forward for its occurrence, Socrates explains why it would not be fitting to commit suicide…

    • 1504 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    But based on what I believe today, I find that death secretly excites me. It is no longer some unknown void that keeps me awake at night, half curious and half afraid – but something to look forward to at the end of a life well-lived. This does not mean that I want to end my own life, because I feel very blessed to be alive with the opportunity to learn and to help others. It also doesn’t mean that I won’t grieve when others die, or that I won’t be afraid as a patient facing imminent death.…

    • 1005 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Plato had many ideas about human nature, but his stemmed from a route that many Philoshipers failed to examine. Plato believed that Human nature had much more to do with our souls then our bodies. Plato states that the principal task of the soul is to pursue knowledge this we can decipher from the Allegory of the cave. Although Plato believed that the soul has three parts the Logical part, the Spirited and the Appetitive. The Logical part of the soul is responsible for the search for knowledge and truth, while the spirited part Plato identified with anger and temper, lastly the appetitive part of the soul Is responsible for love, sex, hunger and thirst; Plato theorised that the appetitive is generally opposed to the logical side of the soul.…

    • 719 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays