He states that the universe exhibits very precise chemical, thermal and astronomical features, such that there is an unimaginably low possibility that the composition, which is the world, could be merely the result of chance; this directs Tennant to the belief that there must be a guiding hand behind the process. It is no coincidence that the earth and its formations are logically and scientifically perfect for the production, reproduction and development of human existence, but instead, the earth functions in the way God intended it to. There is of course a counter argument for this, otherwise known as the Anthropic Principle. Through this, Brandon Carter expresses the principle that we should not be surprised that the universe is as it is, because simply, if it were not, one would not be in existence to be surprised or furthermore, to question such motions. He goes on to say the universe had to evolve one way or another, and one may examine that although it was not entirely impossible for the universe to turn out in the way it did, it was exceedingly unlikely; however this doesn’t mean one could not turn around and claim that it happened through chance. Carter believed this to be entirely possible. The problem with the Anthropic argument is that it treats human existence of prime importance and thus, does not consider the other wonderful creations; one could also claim that had the world turned out entirely differently, we as humans may have not been a superiority within the minute realms of the physical
He states that the universe exhibits very precise chemical, thermal and astronomical features, such that there is an unimaginably low possibility that the composition, which is the world, could be merely the result of chance; this directs Tennant to the belief that there must be a guiding hand behind the process. It is no coincidence that the earth and its formations are logically and scientifically perfect for the production, reproduction and development of human existence, but instead, the earth functions in the way God intended it to. There is of course a counter argument for this, otherwise known as the Anthropic Principle. Through this, Brandon Carter expresses the principle that we should not be surprised that the universe is as it is, because simply, if it were not, one would not be in existence to be surprised or furthermore, to question such motions. He goes on to say the universe had to evolve one way or another, and one may examine that although it was not entirely impossible for the universe to turn out in the way it did, it was exceedingly unlikely; however this doesn’t mean one could not turn around and claim that it happened through chance. Carter believed this to be entirely possible. The problem with the Anthropic argument is that it treats human existence of prime importance and thus, does not consider the other wonderful creations; one could also claim that had the world turned out entirely differently, we as humans may have not been a superiority within the minute realms of the physical