Pros And Cons Of Classical Theism

Superior Essays
The current debate around the openness of God is one that needs to be addressed as it is a debate that questions the very nature of God. This essay endeavours to look at the two opposing views and outline the main issues that are being debated. I will then look at why the issues being discussed are important for how we approach theology and Christian living.
The two sides of the debate that we will be discussing are made up of those supporting ‘classical’ theism and those supporting ‘free will’ or ‘open’ theism. Classical theism, which has been the chief view held by Christians for many years, states that God is immutable, impassable, omnipotent, omnipresent, omniscient which includes knowing the future perfectly and all of the decisions that
…show more content…
One of the really big questions that open theists ask is ‘Does God actually know exactly what is going to happen in the future?’ The classical theist would say yes, he knows everything that is going to happen and all the decisions that will be made but an open theist would suggest that God is omniscient in that he knows everything that can be conceivably known and this does not include the future free actions of …show more content…
If God has no absolute foreknowledge of events then how can He give infallible prophecies? Open theism has addressed this by defining three different types of prophecy; Conditional prophecy, predictive prophecy and fulfilment prophecy. Conditional prophecy are those prophecies thats purpose is to bring God’s people back to Him. Predictive prophecies are those that are made knowing that the outcome of the prophecy is the most likely for example the hardening of Pharaohs heart and fulfilment prophecies are those that will come true because God has willed it to be fulfilled and He will make sure that it happens i.e. That Jesus would rise after three days occurred not because God foresaw that it would take three days but because the prophecy said three days He then made it happen on the third day. These defences along with the free will defence for evil seem to be too convenient and many of the solutions to problems that arise from open theism seem more to be ways of making light of heavy philosophical issues. It is in my opinion that these issues appear to be more convenient than

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Descartes Existence Of God

    • 1454 Words
    • 6 Pages

    John Cottingham, in his book Descartes, affirms that "The problem is given special piquancy by Descartes ' own statement (...) that 'the certainty and truth of all knowledge depends on my knowledge of the true God ' ". This suggests that the knowledge of God should be axiomatic - but it isn 't. Although all the knowledge depends on the knowledge of true God, Descartes ' does not have, at the starting point, any knowledge of God. He shouldn 't be able to give forth any certain and truthful judgment, yet he claims to do so. Apparently, Descartes employs 'clear and distinct ideas ' in demonstrating that God exists (when he perceives clearly and distinctly that 'existence ' is an essential attribute of God or when he puts forth the causal principle) and then justifies the truthfulness of the clear and distinct ideas by the existence of God.…

    • 1454 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Aquinas’s next arguments all go together; at least that is how I preserved it to be. Many question if we truly have free choice because our God is all-knowing and all-powerful. So, he would always know what we were going to do, where and when we were going to do it; therefore, we would not have free choice…

    • 1634 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    He says God is omnipotent not because He does everything there is to be done, but there is nothing he can’t do. God is omniscient not because he knows everything but because he can know everything. Miller gives us an example of how God’s knowledge works. He says to think of God’s knowledge like a big diagram of all the events that are going to happen throughout time. These diagrams should not be thought of as time lines but as diagrams with many branches.…

    • 1869 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    In disagreement, it is clear that Anselm is a new Christian because this is what modern Christian's struggle with or complain how they cannot see God so why do they need to seek someone they cannot see with their whole heart. The strength of his argument is Anselm has a point that everybody comes across at one end in their lives that one cannot see God and it is up to this person to put their faith in God. God does want his creation that is us to have a choice in his existence, and he wants us whom he has created to have faith in its presence. For example, in opinion, in Genesis, God knew ahead of time that Adam and Eve were going to eat of that tree that they were not supposed to eat. This reason was that God wants us to have a choice to believe in his existence and he wants us to choose not to sin.…

    • 1643 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Descartes believe that every effect must have a cause because “something can’t arise from nothing” (Descartes, 1641, p.12). This assumption means that something would have to have given Descartes the idea of God because it would not have been able to come from nothing or just appear in his…

    • 825 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The issue emerges when considering God 's omnibenevolence and the presence of insidiousness on the planet. In principle, since God is the maker of everything and is additionally all knowing and all effective, he needs to know the idea of insidiousness and let it emerge on the planet. Tailing, it is a disagreement to say that God is maximally great, since he would not let enduring and wrong doings on the planet. Under this meaning of God, underhandedness ought not exist. A counter to this announcement is God gave people the decision to act uninhibitedly.…

    • 1071 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Revelation 1: 1-20 Summary

    • 2116 Words
    • 9 Pages

    His glory is revealed and he is the king of kings who will rule on earth and in heaven. However, the main purpose of this book is to reveal the truth of what is coming soon. The word ‘soon’ can imply that things will come, whether it comes quickly or with delay. The bible has already predicted events that have happened, and the book of Revelation prepares us for what has not yet started. The troubles with prophecies is that they tend to speak as if the end is ready to happen, however, it does not reveal when.…

    • 2116 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The argument for God’s existence has remained a constant topic of conversation, and at the head of much controversy. An argument attempting to prove the existence of God can be found through the Cosmological Argument, known also by its informal name as the “first cause argument”. The argument raises the issue of a first cause and where all things in the universe originated. This issue serves importance by highlighting conflicts humanity faces when questioning the origin of all things, and whether or not it was caused directly by God. The argument also sheds light on the natural human tendency to require an explanation for virtually everything that exists.…

    • 1350 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Therefore, the possibly idea of finding a missing part of history is impossible. The reality of it all is that in every hostile situation a God will exist. God existence is valid because you cannot question the faith of his name. People will not believe in God existence because they cannot see or touch him. When you have faith you will believe without being able to touch or see it.…

    • 921 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    This is followed by the premise given at the beginning of the Third Meditation in which thoughts that Descartes can vividly see must be true. Descartes’ clear innate idea of a perfect being is true only if God exists and is not a deceiver. Altogether, Descartes believes that his innate ideas are true and the “Problem of the External World” can be solved through proving the existence of a perfect being using Connection Principle. However, the main objection with Descartes’ argument is how he is able to transition from representational reality to intrinsic reality. Descartes does not clearly define what the Connection Principle…

    • 1522 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays