Examples Of Alternate Possibility

Improved Essays
There are two standard requirements for free will: alternate possibilities and ultimate responsibility. Alternate possibilities mean that the metaphorical path before any agent must be one with forking paths. In terms of alternate possibilities, free will requires the ability to do otherwise. In other words, open futures are necessary for free will to exist. This leads to the second condition for free will: ultimate responsibility. The basis of ultimate responsibility is that in order for an agent to be responsible for an action, that agent must also be responsible for anything that is “a sufficient reason, cause, or motive for the actions occurring” (Kane 121). In order to state that free will exists, an agent must be the true origin of his actions …show more content…
Ultimate responsibility would entail that there must be at least some moments in an agent’s life in which an agent has a truly free choice- an alternate possibility. However, alternate possibilities alone are not sufficient to prove free will. Philosopher J. L. Austin provides several examples in which there is an alternate possibility but no free will. In one example involves a golfer who, due to a twitch, misses his putt (Kane 125). In this example, an alternate possibility clearly exists: the golfer could have not missed the putt; however he could not have freely chose either action. His twitch prevented the golfer from choosing to make the putt. Because of this, onlookers would claim that the golfer is not responsible for missing the putt even though he had the possibility to make it. This action does meet the alternate possibility requirement; however it does not meet the ultimate responsibility requirement. Although alternate possibilities are necessary for free will, they are not sufficient on their own. Agents need both alternate possibilities and ultimate responsibility to have free

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    If the causes of one to perform an action were simple, then one would deem his actions as necessary because they could instantly recall the cause that is forcing them to perform that action. Meaning if all causes were simple, then everyone would believe their action was forced, so no one would believe they are a free agent. Due to the complexity of the causes that lead one to behave a certain way. people tend to believe they are a free agents because they cannot recall the cause of their action. If you cannot recall the cause of an action, therefore you made the action of your own free will.…

    • 1285 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Cahn's Argument Analysis

    • 862 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The idea of moral responsibility is argued between determinists and libertarians, with the division being caused by the possibility of free will. Steven Cahn offers an explanation of the different views of free will with the three opinions being hard determinism, soft determinism, and libertarianism. In this writing, I am going to explain Cahn’s viewpoint, and his idea that freedom is not compatible with determinism. The setting for this argument begins with a criminal trial from the early twentieth century.…

    • 862 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Free will is the known as the capability to decide between different potential courses of action and is a highly questioned topic in the philosophical world. Free will, also closely accompanied to the views of moral responsibility, has some philosophers reason that only actions which are free willed are justified to accept the blame of the action while other philosophers oppose this view. Baron d’Holbach views free will under the idea of Determinism, which entails that only one sequence of actions is possible, which concludes that there is no such thing as free will or choice in the truly deterministic world. In contrast, Compatibilist theorists, like Stace, assert that free will exists and can be well-matched with Determinism.…

    • 1345 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Why Is Strawson Wrong

    • 1118 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In the beginning, he was not morally responsible for his actions because they were not actions that he wanted to take voluntarily, but actions controlled by his condition. On another case, if a child is born with a genetic condition of being violent, the child will have not have free will completely because the child will not think clearly because he will be overcome by his anger. But once he gets psychological help for his anger problem, then he will have control over his actions, have complete free will and can be held morally responsible for his actions. The exception to my argument is if the person’s change in CPM is non-intentional, then the person is not morally responsible for their actions because they had no choice and it was above their control. Take this scenario, where the mother is using drugs during her pregnancy and the baby is born with an addiction to the drug.…

    • 1118 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The question asks, if I do something that I don’t really want to do-such as attending the golden wedding anniversary celebration of Aunt Ethyl and Uncle Fred, or writing a required term paper on “The Accomplishments of Herbert Hoover”- can I still be acting freely? My opinion is yes, I would be acting with my own free will. Furthermore, I think that as long as we are mentally competent, then we always have a choice in what we do, no matter what the circumstance. For example, in my own experience I know that there must be a genetic trait or predisposition that caused me to develop a dependency on alcohol. However, I also realize that I always had free will when it came to picking up a drink.…

    • 146 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Let’s call this premise, Premise 4. It states “In order for an action of yours to be free, you must have the ability to act otherwise” (Kane 24) which leads us to the second conclusion of The Consequence Argument which says “If determinism is true, then no one could have acted otherwise, therefore free will is impossible” (Kane…

    • 1265 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Why Is Strawson Wrong

    • 1137 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Although we are not responsible for our existence, it lies independent to whether we are responsible of our actions. If we have free will, then we are morally responsible for our actions because we decided make those decisions that lead to those actions. In this case, what I mean by the term “free will” is the ability for the person to act and chose freely with no limitations giving the person a power of choice. Therefore, if we have the power to act and chose freely, then we have the same power to be responsible for our actions that were a result of the choices we made. My argument is as follows, if we are grown up, conscious, have no mental issues, and no genetic condition that intervenes with our choice or thinking process, then we have free will.…

    • 1137 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Humans decisions are in the hands of each own. Their opportunity to make use of each decision expresses our free will. In life, humans determine whether their freedom of making their decision is too extreme, and if they should make that decision or not. Sometimes that pushes us to our limit and forces us to do things we are not usually accustomed to doing. While we express the opportunity to showcase free will, there are limits that can stop the idea of it, for example laws.…

    • 768 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In my argument, I am going to support Strawson’s claims and argue against Libertarians that it is not possible to be truly morally responsible for one’s actions even with this idea of indeterminacy. Libertarians specifically believe that our free will allows us to have true moral responsibility. In order to fully understand Strawson’s views and the views of those that counter him, we must revisit what his basic argument is. As human beings, we make specific choices and carry out actions the way we do because of our character or personality or motivational structures (CPM).…

    • 1207 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    The debate of Free Will v Determinism is one that has gone on for centuries, and shall continue to go on for many to come. There are many who believe that their view is the end all, be all, correct view to hold. While not all of these thinkers are correct in their standings, Paul Holbach’s essay, “The Illusion of Free Will,” lays out a strong argument for universal determinism; man does not have any free will, and all of his actions are determined by the laws of nature. His argument is one that is accurate and strong, leaving little to criticize, despite what many believe to be proof that he is incorrect: the presence of choice and the absence of restraint. He takes these two beliefs and shows exactly why they do not denote free will, and all…

    • 2442 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As autonomous humans we generally think we are morally responsible for all the things we have done. That being said, it is only natural to believe that for a person who is morally responsible for what he/she has done than they could have done otherwise. Meaning they could have do the exact opposite of what they did. This alludes to the question that many philosophers have struggled with, this being, what does it mean when someone says that an individual who acted in a particular way “could have done otherwise?.” R. Chrisholm takes this concept as the fundamental question in our metaphysics of action and has formulated many explanations for the so called “free-will problem.”…

    • 929 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For the definition of free will to reign true, human beings must make actions at their own discretion even if it is the wrong choice, which I have previously mentioned is an arbitrary measure. Once humans are created to always choose the good thing, the element of freedom is…

    • 1132 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    This philosophical question is still not unsolved, but in this essay I will argue that a freedom of choice cannot be had by an agent in a deterministic world. Determinism thesis states that all events in the universe are determined by previous events. In determinism, every even is determined to happen by the laws of the the system.it is assumed that once the laws are set and the systems are decided, everyone following the event in the system is also decided. This assumption proves that humans are not free to chose how they act, but are determined by prior events over which they have no control over. The freedom that is precluded by determinism is the freedom to act without recourse to prior events, which means not having a choice determined and is able to act many different ways in any situation regardless of the cause.…

    • 1305 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Free Will Vs. Determinism

    • 2021 Words
    • 9 Pages

    I could not have acted on a desire to get on the Internet, even if I had had that desire. On the other hand, Scenario two, using ordinary English, is a case where I have acted on my free will…

    • 2021 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Since free will is nothing more than an idea of being able to control our on actions, assuming we will take ownership of moral responsibility. These actions could be determined by cause and effect. The problem associated with free will, is that it is subjected to many different concepts such as, sin, guilt , responsibility and judgements associated to making decisions for yourself. When a person feels guilty about a decision they made, subconsciously they know they have probably made the wrong decision. I believe natural intentions are proof that free will may have some truth to…

    • 1101 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays