Commentary On Opening Skinner's Box By Lauren Slater

Improved Essays
Opening Skinner’s Box

We all know that authority has a huge impact in our lives, but how far can authority push a person to do something they do not necessarily want to do. However they still obey authority’s rules because that’s how we have all been taught. As I was reading this novel I came to find out that most of authority figures can push a person so far that they would harm another human being. In the begging of Opening Skinner’s Box author Lauren Slater introduced a psychologist and scientist by the name of B.F Skinner. Skinner was named in Time magazine in 1971 the most influential living psychologist and in 1975 a survey identified him as the best known scientist in the United States. Skinner was known for establishing communities of
…show more content…
A man who was one out of the thirty-five percent who did not obey the authority and shock a man almost to death, Slater wanted to know why he stopped and did not obey the rules. Comments made by Joshua like “that experiment was causing me so much stress that I might have a heart attack and I also did not wasn’t to hurt the guy (p.51).” By making this comment Slater believes there is more to Joshua’s story and she wants to know the real reason he did not obey the experimenter. Was it because Joshua was more worried about his own health and not the man who he was hurting?
In conclusion, Skinner and Milgram are two scientist who have tested many theories and held many experiments to try and figure out the human s behaviors. But why try to control others and their behaviors and why make the comment of having the government absorb these actions. If Skinner and Milgram have opened those doors to understand how the human mind works u am curtain someone out there right now is trying to figure out how to get that other thirty-five percent of the people to obey the rules of the authority

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Stanely Milgram was a social phycologist who conducted an experiment in 1963 about nonviolent people being capable of hurting others due to obeying the authority under pressure despite their feeling of remorse. The way the experiment received progression was by having people play the role of a teacher and a learner. The teacher obeys the authority and the learner had to memorize a certain amount of words. If the learner failed to the duty, he would received a punishment of a dose of high voltage shock. Although the purpose of the experiment was to test how the learner was capable of learning, it to was to test the capability of the teacher to continue the experiment whether or not they felt guilt.…

    • 456 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In 1961 and 1962, psychologist Stanley Milgram conducted a series of experiments designed to test an ordinary citizen’s capacity to inflict physical harm on another human being. Based on the results, Milgram concluded the core of obedience occurs when a person perceives himself as the means for carrying out the wishes of another, and therefore no longer considers himself responsible for his actions. Were Milgram’s experiments ethical? Were his conclusions valid?…

    • 806 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Both writers have a different view over ethics as some might say Stanley Milgram believes that his experiment is fine and not inhumane; however he believes that he has conducted this experiment for science. Even though some test subjects such as “Gretchen Brandt, a Yale Medical Technician who works at Yale, asks throughout the experiment, ‘Shall I continue?’” (79 Milgram). Some might think that Stanley Milgram does not care about how the test subject feels until the end of the experiment. Which is true according to himself during the experiment if the test subject asks if he or she shall continue after the person getting shocked asks to stop, The experimenter says countless times “The experiment requires that you go on" (Milgram 79). Some might think that Stanley Milgram is an awful person for making these people go through such harsh choices on what is the right thing, Stanley Milgram states that “the subjects do not derive satisfaction from inflicting pain, but they often like the feeling they get from pleasing the experimenter" (86…

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In a few short years, the Nazis systematically killed 11 or more million people, essentially the entire population of Pennsylvania. The entire state of Pennsylvania, wiped off the face of the earth. It is incomprehensible that people can be driven to kill a whole race of humans, but that was what happened. The SS and Gestapo officers blindly followed everything the high-ranking officials told them to do, for they were lead to believe that it was good for Germany. Nearly a whole Continent obeyed by Hitler’s every word and, if he wanted the Jews to die, they would be killed.…

    • 1137 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When exploring the field of psychiatry, one may notice a lot of skepticism regarding the opinions psychiatrists offer. A lot of this uncertainty can be traced back to the early 70’s, when David Rosenhan, a psychologist, decided to test how well therapists could differentiate mentally stable people from those unstable (Slater 63). There are many questions that sprang up from Rosenhan’s experiment. Are psychiatrists’ opinions reliable? Do psychiatrists tend to diagnose patients with whatever condition is common in society at the time?…

    • 1124 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The controversy of Professor Stanley Milgram’s experiment stems from the questionable ethnics involved and the debatable reasoning behind the entire procedure which results in study after study of Milgram's work. The Milgram Experiment, a project performed by Milgram in 1963, was meant to show how obedient people are when put under extreme pressure. He compared his results to the Holocaust on the hunch that the commanding officers were so blinded by the situation that even the average Joe could have performed a similar task. Fellow psychologist Diana Baumrind shoots down Milgram’s proposals in her article "Review of Stanley Milgram’s Experiments on Obedience.…

    • 803 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Stanford Prison Experiment revolutionized how society views the relationship between prison guards and prisoners as well as how to conduct social experiments. The college students used by Philip Zimbardo adhered to their roles as the prison guards and gave a more authoritarian response to the students that played the role of the prisoners than Zimbardo hypothesized. These roles shaped the personalities of the prison guards as well as the prisoners. Social Structure and Personality studies the connections between society and the individual. Social Psychologists study this perspective through statuses, roles, and social networks (Rohall, Mikie, and Lucas 2014).…

    • 840 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Stanley Milgram conducted many experiments testing the social control, or the strategies that are meant to prevent deviant behavior (Schaefer). One experiment includes random people who were told to be performing a test on the effect of punishment on learning. A subject would receive the punishment of an electric shock while the other would administer the test and give the increasingly painful shock; however, the test was rigged to where the subject would always be administering the test and the “student” receiving the test would answer incorrect answers on purpose and act as if the electric shock got increasingly worse as it continued. In reality, the experiment observed the execution of orders from an authority figure no matter how immoral.…

    • 261 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Milgram’s experiment showed how an individual’s behavior can change because of authority. In the end, the participants did not stop, even though they felt concerned over the person being shocked, who they believed was in pain over the shocks they were giving him. Many of the participants agreed to do whatever the experimenter asked them to do without questioning the instructions. This is said could have been because of the fact that the experiment was conducted at Yale…

    • 1066 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Numerous amounts of social psychology experiments have been conducted throughout the years, several have been praised for their finding while others have been brutally criticized . In chapter three, “Obscura” from the book, Opening Skinner’s Box by Lauren Slater she lays out an overview of the American social psychologist, Stanley Milgram's experiments. Milgram’s controversial psychological experiments began the summer of 1961.The objective of the experiment was to focus on the obedience level humans have following authority’s commands, even if the requests conflicted with their own conscience. Milgram’s experiment took place in a laboratorial setting at Yale University, it included a total of three people, the ‘teacher’, ‘learner’ and…

    • 273 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I, B.F. Skinner, believe that the cause of abnormal behavior is not due to any psychoanalytical or biological cause, rather they are formed based on a person’s history of conditioning. Through my studies I have found that behaviors that bring about positive consequences have a greater likelihood of being repeated than behaviors that bring about negative consequences. This is known as operant conditioning, the shaping of behaviors by providing rewards to reinforce desired behaviors and providing punishment for undesired behaviors. This system of operant conditioning works on voluntary behaviors and there has been success when it’s been used for Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder (ADHD), Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (OCD), Disruptive…

    • 373 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Additionally, he dismisses Skinner’s claims that because of persuasion (soft control) and reinforcement (strong control) autonomy is not of human choice but rather an environmental control. Chomsky (1971) calls this assertion irrelevant and empty as he is unable to offer “a particle of evidence” (p. 9). Lastly, Chomsky addresses Skinner’s design of a culture that values cultural survival over freedom and dignity. As Chomsky (1971) describes it, Skinner envisions a world so controlled and reinforced that bad behavior rarely occurs. In Chomsky’s opinion, this belief is compatible with a rigid police state.…

    • 522 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In my opinion, B.F. Skinner was a highly influential theorist in modern psychology. His work was hugely beneficial and has also been studied for years. Skinner was highly educated and know to be pretty straightforward about things. His theories have managed to help us in many ways. He studied the behavior patterns of many different living organisms including birds.…

    • 1483 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Bf Skinner Biography

    • 390 Words
    • 2 Pages

    A Little More Information B.F Skinner -Skinner discovered and researched a relation between a person’s actions and consequences (B. F. Skinner Foundation). -Skinner earned his doctorate degree in psychology from Harvard University (B.F.). Alfred Bandura - Bandura earned a Ph.D. Psychology at the University of Iowa in 1952 (Albert). -His research includes social modeling of human learning and self-regulatory mechanisms that lead to the foundation for his renowned theory of human agency (Albert). Sigmund Freud -Freud lived from 1856-1939 and made many discoveries in physiology, psychology, and he was also a medical doctor (Thornton).…

    • 390 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Skinner’s theory bore the mark of true Behaviorism by rejecting anything to do with the effect of internal or biological processes with regard to human behavior. Thus, it is surprising that Geir Overskeid found so many similarities between Skinner and Freud, noting similar career paths, and parallels in positivist and feministic assumption, along with their emphasis that that human behavior was subject to forces beyond conscious control (Overskeid, 2007). It is also noted by Geir Overskeid that Skinner referenced Freud quite regularly in his writings, indicating an admiration for him, if nothing more. However, in various writings, it became apparent that Skinner was not oblivious of the possibility of cognitive control, such as Rogers supported.…

    • 754 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays