Milgram's Controversial Psychological Experiments

Improved Essays
Numerous amounts of social psychology experiments have been conducted throughout the years, several have been praised for their finding while others have been brutally criticized . In chapter three, “Obscura” from the book, Opening Skinner’s Box by Lauren Slater she lays out an overview of the American social psychologist, Stanley Milgram's experiments. Milgram’s controversial psychological experiments began the summer of 1961.The objective of the experiment was to focus on the obedience level humans have following authority’s commands, even if the requests conflicted with their own conscience. Milgram’s experiment took place in a laboratorial setting at Yale University, it included a total of three people, the ‘teacher’, ‘learner’ and

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Stanely Milgram was a social phycologist who conducted an experiment in 1963 about nonviolent people being capable of hurting others due to obeying the authority under pressure despite their feeling of remorse. The way the experiment received progression was by having people play the role of a teacher and a learner. The teacher obeys the authority and the learner had to memorize a certain amount of words. If the learner failed to the duty, he would received a punishment of a dose of high voltage shock. Although the purpose of the experiment was to test how the learner was capable of learning, it to was to test the capability of the teacher to continue the experiment whether or not they felt guilt.…

    • 456 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Milgram’s Obedience Study Milgram’s original motive for executing this ethics breaking experiment was to learn why the German people allowed the murder of millions of Jewish people during the Holocaust. Stanley Milgram wanted to learn as to how people can listen to authority and break their personal morals to follow someone that they believe to be control. During the Holocaust, Nazis led a massacre of millions of Jewish people without letting personal values, such as compassion, stop them from committing this crime. In a general perspective, Milgram wanted to understand the effect of authority and how far people would go to obey authority under extremely conflicting circumstances. If I were placed in this experiment under the teacher position,…

    • 333 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Milgram Obedience Experiment, a series of experiments originating from July 1961, serves as one of the most significant and influential experiments done in history due to its investigation of the conflict between obligation and obedience to authority and personal morality. The experiment was conducted by Stanley Milgram, an American social psychologist that primarily explored social behavior but is best known for the way he tackled the issue of the true power and influence of figures in authority after the Holocaust. Due to the shock of many at the discovery that human beings were capable of such horrible things during the Jewish genocide of World War II, the Milgram Experiment was conducted to identify exactly how the horrible acts of…

    • 1464 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Stanley Milgram, a Yale University psychologist, began an experiment in July 1961 that would drastically alter society’s perception of obedience. Milgram formulated a test to comprehend how far people would perform when coerced into obeying an authoritative figure. The experiment involved subjects being tricked into believing they were electrically shocking another individual; physical and emotional harm to the subjects was followed, resulting from the extreme tension they encountered. Ultimately, Milgram thought he found an underlying connection between his experiment and the Holocaust. The study manufactured mixed reactions from society.…

    • 821 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Stanley Milgram Outline

    • 3385 Words
    • 14 Pages

    1. Explain and discuss the background events and ideas which led to Milgram’s research. Stanley Milgram (1963) was a American social psychologist who carried out the destructive obedience experiment at Yale University in 1963. He was very interested in how far people would go in a situation where it meant hurting another person under an authority figures orders. If an authority figure affected obedience levels in everyday American men. This idea came about after Adolf Eichmann's trial in Jerusalem in 1961.…

    • 3385 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Milgram divulges the "dilemmas" of obedience to authority in his experiment by using; an experimenter - himself, a teacher - "normal" everyday people, and the learner - an actor unknown to the teacher. He then concisely describes two dissimilar sessions and presents his shocking results before concluding that people will view themselves as an…

    • 664 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “The Perils of Obedience” written by Stanley Milgram and “Review of Stanley Milgram’s Experiments on Obedience” written by Diana Baumrind are both intriguing articles about Stanley Milgram’s experiments on obedience. Diana Baumrind believes that Stanley Milgram failed at his experiences on obedience rather than succeeded. Stanley Milgram believed that he succeeded on his experiments if an authority figure tells the test subject to do something then the test subject will. “Stanley Milgram designed an experiment that forced participants either to violate their conscience by obeying the immoral demands of an authority figure or to refuse those demands” (Milgram 77). While both authors address experiments on obedience, Stanley Milgram approaches…

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In his article "The Perils of Obedience," Stanley Milgram describes what, in his opinion, was an ethical experiment performed at Yale University designed to test how ordinary people respond to authority figures' direct orders, even if the orders violate the test subjects' conscience. In order to prevent psychological damage, Milgram's test subjects were reconciled with their victims after the experiment was terminated; he also claims there was an attempt to reduce tensions that resulted from the experiment (Baumrind 92). Overall, Milgram's findings led him to believe that people struggle to resist orders from authority figures for fear of disappointing said figure, and that a person will assume responsibility for their actions so long as they…

    • 1100 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    His use of language gives a complete detail description demonstrating the procedures of each participant in the experiment of what is expected of them. Stanley Milgram portrays a research experiment by means of two individuals to test the boundaries of obedience which requires to be responsible for agony upon a person. In what way can an individual legitimize the brutality that was exposed in the research experiment merely because they were obeying commands made by authoritative figures? The experiment brings to light the lack of ownership of one 's actions an individual is willing to take when they feel they were simply following orders. Milgram makes a good point when he states that "the experimenter did not threaten the subjects with punishment – such as loss of income, community ostracism, or jail – for failure to obey" (p. 409-10).…

    • 1036 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Diana Baurind Experiment Analysis

    • 886 Words
    • 4 Pages
    • 4 Works Cited

    Because the experiment takes place in a laboratory, Baumrind argues that participants will not act how they might in the real world. She states that the laboratory is an unaccustomed setting for a typical being and may cause anxiety and passivity (225). Correspondingly, Saul Mcleod, a psychologist who summarizes and critiques Milgram’s experiment, states that the “important” location of the experiment, obedience levels increased (Simply Psychology). The point about setting is one in which Baumrind and Parker are able to reach a consensus.…

    • 886 Words
    • 4 Pages
    • 4 Works Cited
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Stanley Milgram, a Yale University psychologist, shares his results from an experiment he conducted in regards to obedience of authority in 1963 in, “The Perils of Obedience.” His experiment illustrated that when put under particular circumstances, ordinary citizens have the capability to perform terrible and unexpected actions (Milgram 85). Milgram rationalizes these proceedings through the conclusion that the average individual will decide to please the experimenter rather than resist his authority to protect the wellbeing of the learner (Milgram 86). Diana Baumrind, a psychologist who worked at the Institute of Human Development at the University of California, writes in response to Milgram’s experiment “Review of Stanley Milgram’s Experiments…

    • 1334 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Many people have the idea that during WW1 Nazis killed and tortured many Jews freely and even willingly. What Milgram is doing in his experiment is trying to figure out how easily people follow orders, orders that could harm and potentially kill someone. Milgram got participants through a newspaper article, and paying them $450 to complete the experiment (random sampling). The experiment was carried out in a lab at Yale, causing ecological validity to be good, as it 's a very trustworthy institution and subjects are more likely to abide when in a laboratory compared to a real world setting. He was using a deceiving method by tricking the “teacher” to believe that every time he flipped a set of 30 switches, which were ranged from Slight Shock…

    • 929 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Milgram’s social experiment was an experiment in which laypeople (all white and male) were asked to deliver shocks to actors at the instruction of a scientist. The actor would beg the participant to stop delivering shocks, but the scientist would continue to insist that they continue, relieving them of responsibility if the actor “died,” which it was heavily implied they would. The significant majority delivered what would have been a killing shock, to the surprise of many of the scientists working on it. It was found that a lot of humanity (or, at least, white males) had the capacity for murder if instructed to by the right people; there was a clear blind trust for authority figures. On July 17th, 2014, Eric Garner died from a cop’s…

    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The test proved that seemingly normal people are likely to follow orders given by a person of authority even to the extent of killing another because obedience to authority is ingrained in us all from the way we are brought up. This experiment forced participant to either violate their conscience by obeying immoral demands or not. Milgram’s experiment recruited forty males to take part in the study of “learning” with a total of six hundred thirty-six participants in eighteen separate tests. The participants actually believed they were shocking a real person unaware that the learner was actually acting like being shocked.…

    • 1478 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Psychology of Evil What does it mean to be evil? chances are when everyone is growing up ask at one point, what makes someone turn from good into evil? In the lecture we went over one layout of Milgram’s obedience study we went over during a lecture also could help explain what we now think evil is. In This study Milgram tested the obedience of people to see how far they would go on inflicting pain on someone else because someone of authority told them too, which made people wonder if obedience inferred evil.…

    • 1110 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays