The article “Obama’s ‘Where’s Waldo?’ Presidency”, by Ruth Marcus, features Marcus’s opinion of President Obama, which is generally negative. The article opens by discussing how “Barack Obama can be a strangely passive president.” (Marcus, paragraph 1) Examples of the president’s passiveness include him being “unwilling, reluctant or late to weigh in on the issue of the moment. “ (Marcus, paragraph 1) Marcus then recalls a few matters of Obama’s presidency, stating how she believes he dealt with the issues. Marcus’s opinions are found with ease, including the article’s ending sentence “No matter how hard you look, sometimes he’s impossible to find.” (Marcus, paragraph 12)
Marcus expresses her opinion through a formal tone, using isolated examples throughout the article to help persuade the reader. However, the article is lacking in ethos, which makes it less reliable. At one point in the article, Marcus says, “If the president is being simultaneously accused of overreaching ambition and gutless fight-ducking, maybe he’s doing something right.” (Marcus, paragraph 5) This is where the reader can see that she favors some of Obama’s viewpoints. One literary device Marcus strongly uses in this article is pathos. An example of pathos in the article is where she states, “He is, too often, more reactive than inspirational, …show more content…
Marcus does an excellent job covering up the shortage of facts by using persuasive words and phrases. She accomplishes one of the main goals of a writer in this article, by persuading the reader to agree with her opinion through the use of emotional values. Marcus conveys decent points but fails to provide factual evidence, ultimately making the argument fragile. In the article “Obama’s ‘Where’s Waldo?’ Presidency”, Ruth Marcus undeniably showcases her analytical potential, but overall falls short of presenting a formal
Marcus expresses her opinion through a formal tone, using isolated examples throughout the article to help persuade the reader. However, the article is lacking in ethos, which makes it less reliable. At one point in the article, Marcus says, “If the president is being simultaneously accused of overreaching ambition and gutless fight-ducking, maybe he’s doing something right.” (Marcus, paragraph 5) This is where the reader can see that she favors some of Obama’s viewpoints. One literary device Marcus strongly uses in this article is pathos. An example of pathos in the article is where she states, “He is, too often, more reactive than inspirational, …show more content…
Marcus does an excellent job covering up the shortage of facts by using persuasive words and phrases. She accomplishes one of the main goals of a writer in this article, by persuading the reader to agree with her opinion through the use of emotional values. Marcus conveys decent points but fails to provide factual evidence, ultimately making the argument fragile. In the article “Obama’s ‘Where’s Waldo?’ Presidency”, Ruth Marcus undeniably showcases her analytical potential, but overall falls short of presenting a formal