I evaluated the number of backflips per minute since feeding as well as the number of backflips in comparison to the number of people present by the tank. For hypothesis one, people affecting backflips, it was thought that the presence of people would increase backflip activity (Figure 1). However, this was not supported. The pattern is shown that regardless of training, otters do not increase activity for a crowd. Biologically, this means that the average number of backflips does not depend on the number of people present. The second hypothesis was that time since feeding would decrease backflip activity (Figure 2). This also was not supported. Biologically, this means that the average number of backflips is not dependent on the time since feedings. However, there was a low sample size, 2 otters, and one of the otters was asleep the majority of the time, so results had to be averaged. The averaging resulted in less noise, but with more samples it could have produced stronger data
I evaluated the number of backflips per minute since feeding as well as the number of backflips in comparison to the number of people present by the tank. For hypothesis one, people affecting backflips, it was thought that the presence of people would increase backflip activity (Figure 1). However, this was not supported. The pattern is shown that regardless of training, otters do not increase activity for a crowd. Biologically, this means that the average number of backflips does not depend on the number of people present. The second hypothesis was that time since feeding would decrease backflip activity (Figure 2). This also was not supported. Biologically, this means that the average number of backflips is not dependent on the time since feedings. However, there was a low sample size, 2 otters, and one of the otters was asleep the majority of the time, so results had to be averaged. The averaging resulted in less noise, but with more samples it could have produced stronger data