Niccolo Machiavelli's The Prince

Superior Essays
Niccolo Machiavelli wrote in chapter 15 of his famous work, The Prince that “it is necessary for a ruler, if he wants to hold on to power, to learn how not to be good, and to know when it is and when it is not necessary to use this knowledge” (Machiavelli, The Prince, 48). Throughout The Prince, Machiavelli emphasizes the importance of being crafty and the necessity of being violent. He makes it clear that in order to be a successful ruler, one does not always have to be good; moreover, one should not be good all the time. A ruler can only succeed, Machiavelli notes, when he masters the art of administering cruelty when the circumstances deem necessary. The late nineteenth century and early twentieth century political scientist Max Weber, however, …show more content…
The best way a ruler can do to prevent hatred from growing among the populace, which Machiavelli believes should be the ruler’s greatest fear, is to restore peace as soon as possible after the acquisition. Machiavelli is convinced that cruelty is necessary to keep an army united and that “a ruler ought not to mind the disgrace of being called cruel, if he keeps his subjects peaceful and law-abiding,” therefore Machiavelli is encouraging the ruler to do whatever it takes, no matter how cruel it may seem, to establish peace (Machiavelli, The Prince, 51-52). Machiavelli later uses Agathocles to support his point. He commended Agathocles for working hard to gain power and to hold on to that hard-fought power by “bold and risky tactics” (Machiavelli, The Prince, 28). At this point, however, Machiavelli draws a distinction between power and glory. He recognizes that some of Agathocles’ behaviors, such as massacring one’s citizens and betraying one’s friend did not bring him glory, but nonetheless, Machiavelli continues to praise his use of power and his accomplishments (Machiavelli, The Prince, …show more content…
He states that “people are by nature inconstant”, and therefore, the support and allegiance they promised the ruler will change when their personal interests are at stake (Machiavelli, The Prince, 20). As a result, Machiavelli urges the ruler to employ violence against the people in order to achieve what he wants. Machiavelli boldly claims that it is “safer to be feared than loved” because men are wicked, selfish, and cannot be trusted (Machiavelli, The Prince, 51). It is more suitable that the people should fear the ruler and instead of love him because “men are less nervous of offending someone who makes himself lovable, than someone who makes himself frightening,” and that since fear of punishment has the power to keep the citizens’ behaviors in check, the ruler has a greater chance of achieving what he wants if he makes himself fearful (Machiavelli, The Prince, 53). Since not all people that the ruler encounters are virtuous and ethical, it is to the ruler’s advantage to be cruel in order to pursue his interests (Machiavelli, The Prince,

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Machiavelli is not taking any sides. He just trying to bring the elites and the people together because both relies on each other. In political power, the people have the power to choose their leader while the leader benefits from the people. The ruler can use the people for an army. In which, the ruler can use in his personal gains and needs.…

    • 1888 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He raises the question of whether it is better for a leader to be loved or feared by the public. He answers with the statement, “The reply is, that one ought to be both feared and loved, but as it is difficult for the two to go together, it is much safer to be feared than loved, if one of the two has to be wanting” (69). Machiavelli backs up this statement by saying that a leader who is feared can make decisions and execute orders much more effectively. He thinks a prince should be trusting to a certain degree, but should always be prepared for disaster, saying, “And the prince who has relied solely on their words, without making other preparations, is ruined…” (69). Machiavelli’s thought initially seems negative, as he lacks faith in the public to remain loyal to their prince.…

    • 741 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Watching his home of Italy falling into disarray under weak and divided government, Machiavelli criticized Christian ideals of princes by claiming that “one who abandons what is done for what ought to be done” is welcoming destruction. Examples of his rejection of Christian values in favor of necessary political policies are his instruction that it is “safer to be feared than loved,” and his advice that a leader (in his case a prince) skilled in deceit will “always find those who allow themselves to be deceived.” His…

    • 633 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To defend his opinion, the author explained that as a result of the wicked nature of men, the prince will be guarded from their corruption. Machiavelli considers men as “ungrateful, fickle, liars and deceivers, fearful of danger and greedy for gain.” Furthermore, the following quotes “While you serve their welfare, they are all yours,...” and “But when the danger is close at hand, they turn against you.” support his statement towards the qualities of men. Humans are corrupted beings, therefore causing them to be fearful will suppress their power.…

    • 871 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Niccolò Machiavelli and Alvar Núñez Cabeza de Vaca went through different experiences that led them to have their own perspectives in human nature and create their ideals for good governance. The simple fact that Cabeza de Vaca was unfortunate enough to have a hard time throughout the expedition made him more open minded about human nature, while Machiavelli had a set idea of what human nature was and how it ties to good governance. Machiavelli's view on human nature is the same as what is a good governance a good leader and a good human being is someone who knows how to be respected and feared without being hated and how that leads to have the people the Prince governs happy and on his side. Cabeza de Vaca has a more down to earth view on human nature but that differs…

    • 2016 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In The Prince, Cicero argues that it is best for a prince to be both loved and fear. However, this balance is very hard to maintain, therefore Cicero argues it is better for a prince to be feared than loved. Cicero explains that subjects are more likely to respect a leader if they fear him. He uses the examples of Hannibal and Scipio to display this. Hannibal was very cruel but very skilled, this resulted in his terrified soldiers respecting him.…

    • 643 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although, society would say to “walk away,” not every problem you meet in life are you capable of simply walking away. Machiavelli emphasizes the fact that any one individual cannot always be righteous, such that, certain situations requires you to be a little bit more evil. Instead of Machiavelli stating what everybody would like to live, he tells us the truth in…

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When is the rule by cruelty necessary, according to Machiavelli? According to Machiavelli, he claims that the prince needs to rule by cruelty, especially in terms of crime and justice. If the prince is generous at all times, including the period of disorder, people will lose trust. With courage and cruelty, the prince should abandon his personal qualities, rule by cruelty, and eliminate all possible crimes and misdeeds for the safety of the country.…

    • 944 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Machiavelli’s Prince is a more morally ambiguous ruler; though he does not look down upon the just, and in fact praises and strives towards it whenever possible, the Prince does not fear committing harsh deeds and ordering unjust acts if he determines that doing so will further the interests and prosperity of his state and his people. He is trained primarily in the art of war, and places the…

    • 1713 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Niccolò Machiavelli spent a large majority of his aristocratic platform defaming the many intrinsic characteristics of human emotion and experience. He consciously ignored the essential acts of care and compassion while promoting a message of fear and hate. His teachings offered detailed instructions on the succession and maintenance of a fear-abiding society encapsulated by submission. His philosophy stated that the best interest of the general public was to irrefutably follow the rule of law. To Machiavelli, a human life could be explained as an expendable resource, awaiting its designated task to serve the ruling class.…

    • 904 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Machiavelli’s Prince seeks to recruit and educate a ruler in the art of ruling. His ideal rulers are founders, men who created a fatherland and were not afraid to sacrifice lives and their self-interests for the common good. Machiavelli stresses that a ruler needs to appear virtuous while using vices when necessary to achieve positive results. Machiavelli teaches the ruler to divide his self. “It is essential, therefore, for a Prince […] to have learned how to be other than good, and to use or not use his goodness as necessity requires” (Machiavelli, 40).…

    • 1300 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Machiavelli theory argues that a ruler must do whatever it takes to gain and hold political power, but in the eyes of his subjects have the appearance of being morally…

    • 880 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Ledeen wrote, “All manner of nastiness may be required to keep us under control (p.90).” Machiavelli says that a leader may have to “enter into evil” in order to balance the threat of human nature (p.93). It is comments like this that make Machiavelli both feared and admired, the very thing Machiavelli suggests a prince should strive for…

    • 2341 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One example of this is the way that Machiavelli believes power should be taken, by violent actions such as murder. “For it must be noted, that men must either be caressed or annihilated; they will revenge themselves for small injuries, but cannot do so for great ones; the injury therefore that we do to a man must be such that we need not fear his vengeance” (Machiavelli, 11). In today’s society, ‘Machiavellian’ techniques can be seen as ‘harsh’ and ‘cruel’. In addition, Machiavelli’s teachings mostly deal with monarchies and the problems that they face. “I will not here speak of republics, having already treated of them fully in another place.…

    • 1084 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In many political philosopher’s eyes, there is a special relationship between the ideas of moral goodness and legitimate authority. Some of these political philosophers believed that the use of political power was only morally correct if it was exercised under a ruler who had virtuous morals. These rulers who had virtuous morals were then told that in order to be successful, they needed to make decisions in accordance with the standards of ethical goodness. This moralistic view of authority is what Machiavelli criticizes in his work “The Prince.” In Machiavelli’s book, “The Prince,” the readers are introduced to political values that do not necessarily give full recognition to morality or religion.…

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays