Machiavelli The Prince Rhetorical Analysis Essay

Improved Essays
Written in the excerpt from The Morals of the Prince, Niccolo Machiavelli, being a political philosopher of the Renaissance, analyzes the ideal qualities and the real qualities of princes. According to his excerpt, paragraph seven lies under the subtitle “On Cruelty and Clemency: Whether It Is Better To Be Loved or Feared”. Base on the subtitle, it can be inferred that the following sections will discuss whether a prince should be loved or feared by his people. In paragraph seven of the excerpt, the author states the following: “to be feared is much safer than to be loved.” As stated in the quote, Machiavelli believes that a prince should rule his people with fear because love has harmful consequences. His statements regarding love, fear and …show more content…
To defend his opinion, the author explained that as a result of the wicked nature of men, the prince will be guarded from their corruption. Machiavelli considers men as “ungrateful, fickle, liars and deceivers, fearful of danger and greedy for gain.” Furthermore, the following quotes “While you serve their welfare, they are all yours,...” and “But when the danger is close at hand, they turn against you.” support his statement towards the qualities of men. Humans are corrupted beings, therefore causing them to be fearful will suppress their power. In addition, the author notes that during time of danger, people will not be concerned with “greatness and nobility” and will proceed to kill the prince, regardless of his words of love. Their motivation comes from their vile and selfish thoughts to accomplish what will benefit them. Consequently, this is the result of any prince who is loved because: “love is a link obligation which men, because they are rotten, will break any time they think doing so serves their advantage; but fear involves dread of punishment, from which they can never …show more content…
North Korea’s dictatorship is considered to be cruel and fearful; as a result its citizens are extremely loyal. In order to terrorize its citizens, North Korea contains several camps or prisons. Those who disobey the rules are sent to these camps for punishment, often offenders’ families are also taken along with them. Inside these camps, prisoners are vulnerable to inhumane acts, including forced labor, tortures and executions. North Korea also imposes heavy censorship and surveillance on its people. Citizens must follow numerous strict laws and remain isolated from the work; unlike their leaders who has access to the Internet. As a result, citizens must obey to their leader in order to be safe and remain alive. Despite of the country’s cruelty, numerous North Koreans still admire, respect and even worship Kim Jong-un. However, whether or not some North Koreans truly honor their leader still remains as a

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In one section of the article, Vincent Barnett discusses some of the alternative ways that Machiavelli’s The Prince can be interpreted. One interpretation was that Machiavelli possibly intended for his writing to be satirical, because certain facts, such as how Machiavelli had a family, refute his statement from the pamphlet that he believes all humans are evil. Also, it is possible that Machiavelli didn’t actually agree with the ideas in his writing, but he only wrote those things to gain favor from the leaders of his time. These are just possibilities, but knowing about Machiavelli’s life and his situation are important in order to understand his motives for writing The Prince. Just like Machiavelli, present-day leaders and authors make…

    • 186 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Niccolò Machiavelli and Alvar Núñez Cabeza de Vaca went through different experiences that led them to have their own perspectives in human nature and create their ideals for good governance. The simple fact that Cabeza de Vaca was unfortunate enough to have a hard time throughout the expedition made him more open minded about human nature, while Machiavelli had a set idea of what human nature was and how it ties to good governance. Machiavelli's view on human nature is the same as what is a good governance a good leader and a good human being is someone who knows how to be respected and feared without being hated and how that leads to have the people the Prince governs happy and on his side. Cabeza de Vaca has a more down to earth view on human nature but that differs…

    • 2016 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Machiavelli and Hobbes both address the impact the human emotion of fear has on the political realm. In The Prince, Machiavelli explains how fear is a tool meant to be manipulated by the prince as a means to keep the people in line with the law and loyal. Not enough fear instilled in the public may lead them to disloyalty and then the dethroning of the prince; on the other hand, too much fear perpetuates hatred among the people and leads once again to the prince’s removal. Unlike seeing human fear as a tool, Hobbes in the Leviathan describes it more as a natural emotion of human which pushes the creations of covenants—social agreements or contracts among the people and the sovereign. In the state of nature, the natural condition of men without…

    • 1099 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Machiavelli argued that the ruler or the politicians could achieve national goals with various ways, which include both angle and evil deed. “ Therefore, a prince must not worry about the infamy of being considered cruel when it is a matter of keeping his subjects united and loyal” ,“A prince, and especially a new prince, cannot observe all those things for which men are considered good, because in order to maintain the state he must often act against his faith, against charity, against humanity, and against religion”Form these two sentence, we can clearly understand that the public virtue of Machiavelli can be realized by the evil deed. The division of two kinds of virtue doesn’t mean that Machiavelli deny the importance of private virtue. In his opinion, private virtue should play an important role within a range, like transforming man ' s ideology and cultivate good personality.…

    • 1199 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If the prince ignores the crime and disorderly in the country, it will continuously become more dangerous over time and people will not choose to live in their own country. The prince needs courage and cruelty, even if it will be against his will, to protect his country, which is one of the ultimate goals that must be achieved as the Prince. Machiavelli asks, is it better to be loved than feared, or vice versa? What's his answer and why?…

    • 944 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Plato’s Republic and Machiavelli’s The Prince depict their views of both the duties and the ideal personas that rulers should strive towards. Socrates, in Republic, strives to discover truth in the creation of a hypothetical “perfect city,” in which all citizens are just and fair to each other. His Philosopher King was designed to rule this ideal city, and as such this is a perfect and ideal figure. Having been educated only in the just for his whole life, this Philosopher King is always virtuous, and relies purely on this virtue to be a good ruler for his people.…

    • 1713 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When we hear the word “Machiavellian”, we often connect that term to an immoral cynical disregard for the purpose of personal gain, but we should not assume that Niccolò Machiavelli had that intention of creating this idea. In the Republic of Florence of 1513, Machiavelli published “The Prince”, laying down the first foundation for modern political philosophy, and addressing the concerns of how people can achieve and maintain civil society. With the right virtue, physical arms, people, and opportunity, people can compel themselves to bring about principality. To bring about change in the name of the people, using just violence mindlessly will not work, nor will truth or message alone will work.…

    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To answer the question that was addressed who should fear that, it is clear that by these quotes that the prince is the one that needs to be feared and his subjects are the ones who should be in fear. An important factor that needs to be noted is that he believed in a negative anthropology and people are basically no good and he believes that fear should be used to keep the subjects in check. This also being his way to justify that being feared is more effective than being loved. Thomas Hobbs in the Leviathan had a similar take on the way fear is being…

    • 1077 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Machiavelli dives into politics with a very aggressive and pure mindset suggesting kings and princes to only worry about the end result without caring for the means of achieving it. Informing the readers that they should do anything it takes to get into and stay in power, the ends justify the means ideal. Machiavelli states that “Every one sees what you appear to be, few really know what you are, and those few dare not oppose themselves to the opinion of the many, who have the majesty of the state to defend them; and in the actions of all men, and especially of princes, which it is not prudent to challenge, one judges by the result.” essentially saying even if the means are unjust the people only see and judge you by the results. However, the “few” mentioned by him will eventually lead to a breach in society.…

    • 1637 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    What Is Machiavellianism

    • 1775 Words
    • 8 Pages

    A quote from one of Machiavelli’s works The Prince reiterates a common theme “...love is preserved by the link of obligation which, owing to the baseness of men, is broken at every…

    • 1775 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Niccolò Machiavelli spent a large majority of his aristocratic platform defaming the many intrinsic characteristics of human emotion and experience. He consciously ignored the essential acts of care and compassion while promoting a message of fear and hate. His teachings offered detailed instructions on the succession and maintenance of a fear-abiding society encapsulated by submission. His philosophy stated that the best interest of the general public was to irrefutably follow the rule of law. To Machiavelli, a human life could be explained as an expendable resource, awaiting its designated task to serve the ruling class.…

    • 904 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “The lion cannot protect himself from traps, and the fox cannot defend himself from wolves. One must therefore be a fox to recognize traps, and a lion to frighten wolves.” Machiavelli uses this analogy as an attempt to teach the masses how to embrace their human significance. Machiavelli wrote The Prince at a time where there was political unrest and confusion in Italy, which is why it can be interpreted in many different ways, such as a political satire or epilogue of his political views; however, while the content may be confusing the true meaning of The Prince is to be understood as a satire. Machiavelli is continuously sarcastic through out the course of the novel about the government standings and the changing world.…

    • 1412 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Machiavelli's The Prince

    • 400 Words
    • 2 Pages

    While being feared might seem unnecessary to some, Machiavelli goes on to note that being loved is a much more dangerous way of life because, love, is held by men who are “wicked”. Without the instilment of fear, the loyalty that comes from love would be “broken at every opportunity” for mans own advantage (Prince, ch.17). Furthermore, because Machiavelli was banished, it is suggested that he was indeed feared and not only because of…

    • 400 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The analysis of Machiavelli as an amoralist – someone who disregards common views of what is right and wrong, unconcerned with morality as a whole (as compared to being immoral, and going against them) – is complicated. A traditional view of morality advocates for not doing wrong or harm to others, for altruism, and kindness. Nowhere in his philosophical work The Prince, first published in 1532, does Machiavelli show any regard for this kind of morality. The Prince is a guidebook for the maintenance of power by a prince (the name he gives to any sovereign); Machiavelli’s sole concern is how to stay in power and best exert it to prolong your rule and prosperity. However, this argument can only be made with a traditional, standard view of morality…

    • 977 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Machiavelli argues that too much compassion brings along dire consequences, as too much mercy allow disorders to take place, thus justifying acts of cruelty, on occasion, in order to prevent such outcomes from happening. Therefore, acts of cruelty may also be used to protect the people. This leads to Machiavelli’s answer to his famous question, arguing that while one hopes to be both feared and loved, it is nearly impossible to carry out such high standards. Being feared is more preferable, as those living under the ruler’s feared reputation are protected from acts of evil. In addition, Machiavelli argues that men are “ungrateful, fickle, pretenders and dissemblers, evaders of danger, eager for gain”, which should dissuade princes from too much compassions, as they will be taken advantage of from the…

    • 806 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays