New York Penal Law: Case Study

Improved Essays
QUESTIONS PRESENTED

1. Under New York Penal Law, false statements or failure to disclose material facts may result in denial of an application to the bar. William Gould admits to withholding information on his application for admission to the New York State Bar, and has no intention of remedying these omissions. Given that Mr. Gould has left important information from his bar application, is he likely to be admitted to practice law in the state of New York?

2. Mr. Gould has divulged information to us that he did not include in his application to the New York State Bar. Mr. Gould further claims that he has no intention of telling the truth regarding these matters during his upcoming hearing before the Character and Fitness Committee. In light
…show more content…
Gould was held in the bookstore after trying to shoplift a book. Letter from William Gould to Bernard Murphy, Esq., Murphy, Daugherty, and Smith, LLP. (September 1, 2016) (on file with Murphy, Daugherty, and Smith, LLP.). The police were called, but before they made an arrest the store owner decided to let Mr. Gould off with only a warning. Id. Mr. Gould did not disclose this information on his bar application, nor is required to do so. The bar application asks specifically for arrests, convictions, and citations, but makes no mention of detentions. N.Y. Bar Application, F (2010). In this particular instance, Mr. Gould was detained but not actually arrested or convicted of any crime. Similar to the issue surrounding Ms. Fisher’s drug dealing allegations, Mr. Gould should not be held accountable for failing to disclose this information on his application. He should, however, be prepared to answer questions about this detainment truthfully in the event that the Committee asks if there is any relevant information he would like to disclose that was not included anywhere in the bar …show more content…
Gould’s initial letter seeking legal advice and representation is protected by the aforementioned attorney-client privilege. Here, because Mr. Gould has not waived his right to the privilege, the information revealed in his initial correspondence with this firm cannot be used against him, including the information that he plans to lie to the Committee about. N.Y. C.P.L.R.(a)(1) (McKinney 2016). The best that this firm could do would be to suggest that Mr. Gould amend his application to the bar and be truthful at his Committee hearing, both of which we cannot compel him to actually do. Expanding on this premise, this firm can choose not to represent Mr. Gould on the grounds that it believes his actions to be criminal or fraudulent. N.Y. Jud. Law (1.16)(c)(2) (McKinney 2016). The fact that the firm has knowledge of Mr. Gould’s intentions to suppress evidence that he has a legal obligation to reveal or produce to the Appellate Division on his bar application is the foundation on which representation should be refused. N.Y. Jud. Law (3.4)(a)(1) (McKinney

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Actus Rea

    • 1024 Words
    • 5 Pages

    No facts in this case show Ryan had any involvement in this case. The state cannot charge Zynal and Ryan because the state can’t prove Actus rea and Mens rea. State v Jason and Arooj Issue: Can the state char Jason and Arooj with burglary? Rule: Actus Rea: An act that is voluntary or there is an…

    • 1024 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    EDAD 524: Legal Case Study

    • 1355 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The university breached the contract because there was no language that would have made Robert know he was in danger of being dismissed from the program. Robert claims he was denied procedural and substantive due process in the decision made by the university. In addressing procedural due process there are two questions that must be answered before moving forward; did the law or policy interfere with a protected interest? And what is the process…

    • 1355 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Parol Evidence Rule

    • 1413 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Wiencek further argues that the trial court erred by considering “parol evidence to vary the effective date of the [B108 agreement] and to controvert the integration clause.” CHH, for its part, avers that the admission of parol evidence was proper because it was offered to determine whether the contract was effective. We hold that the circuit court did not violate the parole evidence rule because extrinsic evidence was not offered to add or modify any terms to the B108 agreement. Generally, parol or extrinsic evidence is inadmissible to vary the terms of an integrated contract. Foreman v. Melrod, 257 Md. 435, 441 (1970) (“‘All prior and contemporaneous negotiations are merged in the written instrument, which is treated as the exclusive…

    • 1413 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Alternatively, Caldwell contends that review of this sufficiency claim is proper because Caldwell’s trial counsel was ineffective for failing to challenge the sufficiency of the evidence before the trial court. We hold that this issue is not preserved and we decline to consider whether there was sufficient evidence to convict Caldwell of conspiracy to burglarize the Alkaline Water Company. The scope of appellate review is articulated in Md. Rule 8-131(a) and provides that “[o]rdinarily, the appellate court will not decide any other issue unless it plainly appears by the record to have been raised in or decided by the trial court . .…

    • 1873 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Which is why Ocwen never gave us a straight answer as to who holds this responsibility or who holds our note. FCRA Our claim arising under the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA), 15 U.S.C. § 1681s was not added to the amended complaint because as Pro Se litigants, we learn as we go. We learned of the violations after we amended our complaint. Our ignorance should not give Ocwen 's illegal business practices a pass.…

    • 1647 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Rule 10b-5 bars any person from making a misstatement or omission of material fact in relation to the purchase or sale of any security. The wrongful act was in association with the national securities exchange, which is one of the requirements of Rule 10b-5. A purchaser of a security is able to sue an auditor who has misstated or omitted a material fact without requiring privity. The defendant must have acted with scienter, intent to deceive, which isn’t the case in this situation therefore I wouldn’t be found liable under Rule 10b-5. (Mallor, 2010, p. 1202) IV.…

    • 1799 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He states that the executive is separated from the judiciary. Thus the judiciary cannot tell or order the executive to perform a particular function, which in this case was granting executive clemency to the survivors, as stated by Chief Justice Truepenny. He goes on to say that he, as a private citizen, wants Pi to be pardoned altogether. But as a Judge he cannot tell the executive what to do and the Chief Executive has to reach a decision on his own. He chides Truepenny for requesting clemency when it is not his job to do so.…

    • 1485 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    employment history too. Hence the first negative effect of DACA policy on illegal immigrants’ life is that this policy doesn’t give any assurance whether the information provided at the time of application would not be used to deport them if they failed to fulfill DACA policy requirements. The problem arises as Chishti and Hipsman point out in their article “Key Factors, Unresolved Issues in the New Deferred Action Program for Immigrant Youth will Determine its Success”, trust will be eroded if the applicant or applicant’s family member do no not meet the requirements placed in deportation. This will prevent many eligible applicants from applying to DACA policy in fear of putting their family in danger. On the other hand, hiring illegal immigrant is an illegal act.…

    • 1905 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Christina Gutierrez the lawyer for Adnan failed to present all the facts that would give benefit to her client. Using Asia’s testimony of her memory of that very day could've changed the outcome of Adnan’s life “ I trust the court system to do their due diligence. Because I was never questioned. I was never informed of anything pertaining to the case. I don't know why he was convicted” (McClain, ep.…

    • 1036 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Which is known as “Hot Pursuit”. However, this is not the case when searching the cell phone because the Det. Did not have any evidence of their handgun or any reason to suspect something in her photos and therefore Det. Colabello should not have accessed Ms. Alomar’s photos. In the precedent case R. v. Macooh, the trial judge clearly states “the officer 's entry into the dwelling house in “hot pursuit” of a person suspected of a breach of summary legislation contained in a provincial enactment, as opposed to an indictable offence, was unlawful, and that the arrest of the person within the premises was therefore also unlawful.” From this statement, one can conclude that just like in the Alomar and Bell case, there was not enough legal evidence to legally obtain…

    • 1144 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays