Howard D. Brunson Case Summary

Superior Essays
Stevan Jakovljevic
Professor Avdeev
Law 2010-05
Fall 2016
Case Brief
Term Researched: Duty of Care
Case Name: Howard D. Brunson (Plaintiff-Respondent) v. Affinity Federal Credit Union
Legal Citation: 954 A.2d 550 (N.J. Super. App. Div. 2008)
Date Decided: May 05, 2009
Legal History: Howard D. Brunson the plaintiff filed a four count complaint in the Supreme Court of New Jersey against Affinity Federal Credit Union and Wilcox for being liable to him for malicious prosecution (Count 1); That Wilcox was liable to plaintiff to negligence (Count 2): That Affinity was liable to plaintiff in hiring of Wilcox (Count 3); and that the person who actually committed the crime was liable to the plaintiff in negligence. (Count 4). Affinity and Wilcox moved for entry of summary judgement in their favor and wanted the case dismissed because they plaintiff had failed to appear for a deposition or a response to a notice which was in lieu of subpoena. Even though the plaintiff objected the trial court granted both motions. The plaintiff appealed to the Supreme Court of New Jersey and the appellate Division reversed and remanded.
Facts: Howard D. Brunson was accused and sued for
…show more content…
He is suing the bank and the investigator because he was wrongly accused of opening these accounts but the investigator just jumped to conclusions and it affected Brunson’s life which now the court has to decide whether the bank owes responsibility to Brunson. For the court to use Duty of Care they needed to look at other similar cares and see if the bank should have prevented these fraud accounts from being opened up. Now the next issue is that Brunson is suing the bank for malicious prosecution and the court needs to decide whether Wilcox and the bank had conducted a thorough investigation before accusing Brunson. The Identification the imposter was using had so many errors on it and Wilcox should have seen the

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Connick v. Thompson: 563 U.S. _____, 131 S.Ct. 1350, 179 L.Ed.2d 417 (2011) – One of the issues raised in this case was the violation of Brady v. Maryland where the prosecutor withheld exculpatory evidence (law.cornell.edu. n.d.). Therefore, Thompson brought a suit pursuant 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging that the district attorney’s office was liable for failing to properly training its employees on the requirements of Brady.…

    • 1010 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Rationale: 1. Under Tort law, Tony and Doug lied to Robert, their behavior was a fraud and violated the fiduciary duty of care, what they said didn’t in good faith and was harmful to the company. 2, Tony and Doug violated section 10(b) and rule 10b-5 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 by making untrue statement of a material fact willfully. a. Fact: Laura was fired by Doug after the meeting.…

    • 866 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Donn Milton Case Summary

    • 371 Words
    • 2 Pages

    IITRI removed the case to federal court and successfully moved to dismiss Legal issue and Question: Donn Milton's wrongful discharge action against his former employer, IIT Research Institute (IITRI), raises two legal issues: the choice of law to govern Milton's claim and the viability of his claim under that law. Legal Answer and who wins: The court held judgment of District Courts dismissing Donn Milton's wrongful discharge action against his former employer. Reasoning: Maryland law recognizes a small loop whole the general rule of at-will employment. As per the law the exception for the common rule of at-will employment is applied in the case: (1) "where an employee has been fired for refusing to violate the law or the legal rights of a third party," and (2) "where [an] employee has been terminated for exercising a specific legal right or duty," Because Milton does not fit in either category, his suit for wrongful discharge was properly dismissed.…

    • 371 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Assignment sub-heading: TITLE AND CITATION: Gardner v. Broderick, 88 S. Ct. 1913 (1968) TYPE OF ACTION: Robert Gardner filed suit against the State of New York, seeking reinstatement as a New York City patrol officer and demanded back pay. He refused to waive his privilege against self-incrimination. FACTS OF THE CASE: In August 1965, Robert Gardner appeared before a grand jury which was investigating alleged bribery activity involving, police corruption in connection with illegal gambling operations. Gardner was advised that the Grand Jury elected to examine him concerning the performance of his required duties. Robert was asked to sign a waiver of immunity and his privilege against self- incrimination was also explained.…

    • 291 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Abel Fields Free Speech

    • 570 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Like in previous cases like the N.Y. Times Publishing vs. Sullivan when the N.Y. Times posted an ad claiming that Montgomery police force had done some misdeeds towards the community, but these accusations were made off of unconfirmed facts. The commissioner of the police force, Commissioner Sullivan sued the newspaper company but the court ruled that the press could not be convicted unless there’s proof of bad intentions. Another example is the Texas vs. Johnson case the defendant Gregory Johnson was convicted for disrespecting the American flag by burning it, during the time there are laws in Texas that make this behavior a crime. Johnson pleaded towards the conviction; he felt the law was unconstitutional and said that the government cannot restrict the freedom to speak or express ourselves, although…

    • 570 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When Thomas was asked if he believed that he was a victim of sabotage and that Hill had falsified the allegations of sexual harassment he said, “some interest groups came up with this story, and this story was developed specifically to destroy me” (Smolowe). Hill’s accusations were seen as a “flight of fantasy” by many like Orrin Hatch which then labeled her as “delusional and a candidate for medical attention” (Smolowe). However, Hill just wanted justice for what she went through and never wanted for her accusations to be leaked to the public, as the one that was sexually assaulted it must be hard to deal with the press after all that…

    • 1101 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The charges are what the government issues to begin the criminal process Martha Stewart and Peter Bacanov are faced with several charges in the original indictment. The charges include that of Conspiracy. This charge is filed by the government against both Martha Stewart and Bacanovic. The government alleges that both Stewart and Bacanovic willfully and knowingly worked together to make false statements in the stock-trading scandal. Stewart lied when she told the Securities and Exchange Commission, the FBI and federal prosecutors she had prearranged with Bacanovic to sell ImClone when it fell well below $60 per share.…

    • 1956 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Finally, there was an anonymous phone call made in 1997 from a person who warned of the illegal practices BFA was engaging in. The only that Arthur Andersen did that might be construed as reacting appropriately was the writing of an internal memo that alluded to the phone call. But the suit alleges that the matter ended there. 5. For Arthur Andersen to regularly give a company like BFA copies of its audited financials, which are then distributed to investors, is a dubious practice.…

    • 660 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Yuliano threatened CDI with a lawsuit for fraud and age discrimination. Both parties reached a settlement where Yuliano would wave all claims against CDI for a financial settlement. In response to the complaint CDI seeks the dismissal for Yuliano’s qui tam claim alleging fraud on the grounds that he is barred…

    • 1999 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The next step was writing an affidavit to present to a Superior Court judge to receive a search warrant. Then the evidence found was used to charge Leon and Del Castillo. They were indicted for federal drug offenses, and they filed motions to suppress the evidence seized pursuant to the warrant. The District Court allowed these motions and concluded that the search warrant was not valid due to the lack of probable cause for the warrant. They however recognized that Officer Rombach had acted in good faith, the court then rejected the Government's suggestion that the Fourth Amendment exclusionary rule should not apply where evidence is seized in reasonable, good faith reliance on a search warrant.…

    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays