Warfare In The Twenty-First Century

Improved Essays
“What strategic theory or theorist do you believe best explains the nature and character of warfare in the Twenty-First Century?”
War involves the destruction of physical and material strength of the parties involved. Destruction of life, institution, law, morality, culture, property, etc. This exhibits the nature of war and hence inherently in human history there has been wars, there has been fighting, and there has been killing. It is happening today and possibly will continue in the future, because nations need to be secure from threatening by other nations and/or fight for the protection of their interest. War has been used as an instrument by human beings to protect their interests. It will continue, as the human interests are insatiable as we are seeing today. With no doubt war will hard to detached from the society because it abruptly arise on one corner of today’s world and severely devastating the nations. We cannot stop war by denouncing it as destructive or by negotiating it, because no nation can negotiate on matter considerers it affect national interest. Therefore, if we want to prevent war, leaders should know what is war and inquiry what causes it, why and how war conducted in order to bring solution for nation by eliminating it cause. Moreover, we obviously need theories and principles of war to enhance our judgment of the essence of war and evaluate their current application. Through comprehensive assessment of different theories, we reflect on great intellectuals and fundamental definition of war, on history of great wars, and find how theories work.
…show more content…
Nevertheless, as Clausewitz argued, theories of war is just a guidance to our judgment so it is uniformly work today or in the future. Theories are not manual for action in war, but a means to study war and a frame of reference in our decision making process. (Ch 2, p

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Americans have been fascinated with the concept of war for centuries. War has evolved from a last resort into an opportunity for America to prove its superiority against other countries, and to instill fear within the nation. In short, war is a grandiose weapon. In the novel, The New American Militarism: How Americans Are Seduced by War, Andrew J. Bacevich discusses the relationship that has existed and continues to exist between America and war. Although Bacevich is able to pinpoint a plethora of explanations as to how militarism has evolved into what it is now, he does not present a clear thesis.…

    • 1051 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The National Military Strategy emphasizes the recognition of human, cultural, and political continuities of armed conflict xxxx. This strategy calls for forces possessing cross-cultural capabilities that permit them to operate effectively among populations. Inherent in this vision is a mastery of language, cultural awareness, and an in-depth knowledge of peoples, political systems, religion, demographics, infrastructure, and a host of other factors that can vary significantly by country and region (xxxStrategic Studies Institute). The US can increase stability in Europe by employing a strategy that prioritizes state-building projects in former Soviet Union territory. As Russia continues to regain the prominence it once enjoyed, and the…

    • 1453 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Sun Tzu Art Of War

    • 699 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Sun Tzu’s theories in the “Art of War” demonstrate an erroneous belief in the separation of political and military strategy. This is evident in the execution of the king’s concubines and Sun Tzu’s five circumstances that can predict victory. General Robert Lee and Confederate President Jefferson Davis’ inability to commit to a course of action in the South, proved insurmountable. Germany’s Military Leadership in World War One clearly should have advised against military action and sought a diplomatic solution. Both cases are excellent examples where a disconnection between political and military strategies prove to be perilous.…

    • 699 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Attributing ‘new wars’ to be determined by asymmetry as the most important feature provides suitable parameters of war which constitutes a ‘new war’ as the environment of war shifts as Clausewitz identifies but also the actors. As concluded, the lines of war are becoming much more blurred than in previous centuries due to close alliances between mercenaries and bandits. In addition, Münkler recognizes that similarities can be drawn from wars of the fourteenth and fifteenth centuries. He has brought together key elements from the wider literature of Political Violence and Terror referencing key theorists and attributing varied theories to Asymmetry with a wide range of aspects: technology, economics, motivations and ideology. Asymmetry provides an umbrella theme of ‘new war’.…

    • 1535 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ever since the evolution of mankind, the art of warfare has witnessed numerous changes. From early hand to hand fight, the art of warfare transitioned to become the battle of wits, nerves, technology and tactics. Wars were fought with the swords and spears till the invention of guns in 14th century. From the first use of guns in a battle till the Napoleonic era, warfare relied on manpower and line-and-column tactics to achieve firepower concentration. Focus of warfare shifted from manpower to firepower, between American civil war and WW-I, with the invention of machine guns and efficient rifles.…

    • 2222 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Lasting Influence of Carl von Clausewitz’s On War The French Revolution and the Napoleonic Wars changed the political landscape of Europe. Universal conscription allowed for the massive growth of armies, and it became imperative for nations to study military planning and strategy in order to consider the political and logistical aspects of war in a more effective manner. As a result a veritable renaissance of military writings and philosophies began to populate intellectual circles including the works of Carl von Clausewitz’s On War and his contemporary Baron Antoine-Henri Jomini. Clausewitz’s On War aims to define war “grammatically”, that is to say, stripping the subject down to the core elements that drive the phenomenon of warfare.…

    • 813 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A Review of Fearon’s “Rationalist Explanations for War” War and peace have played the central role in the field of international relations. In the paper “Rationalist Explanations for War”, Fearon provides three coherent rationalist explanations for the central puzzle about war, namely, why war occurs and recurs albeit war is inefficient ex post. Fearon first refutes five rationalist arguments that accepted as tenable in previous literature. These arguments are: 1) anarchy; 2) expected benefits greater than expected costs; 3) rational preventive war; 4) rational miscalculation due to lack of information; and 5) rational miscalculation or disagreement about relative power. Fearon criticizes that the first three arguments simply do not address…

    • 529 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Furthermore, the anticipated advantages must exceed the anticipated expenses and wastage in a long-term manner with an exclusive focus to establish the human rights. The hypothesis additionally contends that every one of the criteria should be available before a war can be regarded justifiable and henceforth embraced. The hypothesis of justifiable or reasonable war, without a doubt, contends that wars might be fought when there is no other choice for an entity to protect its sovereignty, freedom, the rights of citizens, and the safety of the nation as a means of extreme necessity. It suggests that the wars should be fought when the circumstances created by an external authority undermine the most crucial interests of a nation and do not at all encourage the contrasting options to utilize power. For example, WWII compelled a number of nations to go to war in order to maintain their freedom and preserve the basic rights of the…

    • 602 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Future armed conflict will be complex, in part, because threats, enemies, and adversaries are becoming increasingly capable and elusive. State and nonstate actors employ traditional, unconventional, and hybrid strategies that threaten U.S. security and vital interests. The complexity of future armed conflict is due to increasing momentum of human interaction, threats emanating from dense and weakly governed urban areas, the availability of lethal weapon systems, and the proliferation of CBRNE threats. Enemies and adversaries will challenge U.S. competitive advantages in the land, air, maritime, space, and cyberspace domains. What all Army operations will have in common is a need for innovative and adaptive leaders that thrive in conditions…

    • 253 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    It was known that the character of war has changed whilst the nature of war has not. Why is it so? To understand further lets us first define what is the character of war and the nature of war. The character of war describes the changing way that war as a phenomenon manifests in the real world. War’s conduct is undoubtedly influenced by technology, law, ethics and military organization, and other factors that change across time and place.…

    • 1457 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Arguments Against Just War

    • 1327 Words
    • 6 Pages

    War and conflict have been a part of the human experience for most of recorded history, and many scholars use the concept of just war to analyse wars in their own time and in the past, and to consider how to create long lasting peace. Just war theory forms the basis of much of international law today, and still can be used to analyse modern day conflict, such as the Russian Federation’s annexation of Crimea in 2014. Just war theory in its most coherent form was first discussed by Saint Thomas Aquinas in the 14th Century, and has gone on to be analysed and debated by many scholars since. A more contemporary analyst of just war theory, Michael Walzer, wrote “War is always judged twice, first with reference to the reasons states have for fighting,…

    • 1327 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In “Rationalist Explanations for War,” James Fearon argues that due to war’s costly nature and states’ risk-averse, or at least risk-neutral, tendencies, there should always exist some possible prewar agreement between two disputing states that both parties would prefer to achieve over committing to war. While seeking to reveal his main claim that war is caused by information problems, commitment problems, and issue indivisibilities, Fearon critiques five traditional Neorealist explanations of war: anarchy, positive expected utility, preventive war, lack of information, and miscalculation of relative power. Although Fearon’s critique of the majority of these theories are earnest and do expose multiple logical shortcomings, his rapid dismissal…

    • 1115 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Realism And The Cold War

    • 1470 Words
    • 6 Pages

    (Waltz 2000), there is no way to guarantee lasting peace so states must be sure to protect themselves even if that will result in war. Hence, the need to protect the states sovereignty does inevitably result in war; war is a tool to ensure power and security and as such will always…

    • 1470 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although he is accurate in saying so, since it is still possible for states to go to war with one another, I believe that society’s idea of war has been reshaped because of nuclear weapons and influences by non-state actors. I think that the question is not whether war is obsolete, but rather what does war mean in contemporary society? It clearly is not the “social practice that was once considered normal” (Mandelbaum 35) due to the irrationality of using nuclear weapons against one another. Also, terrorists and other non-state actors are increasingly reshaping what we believe conflicts on the global scale are illustrated as. It is quite possible that in a few decades, war will centrally be defined as these “unconventional conflicts,” hence initiating the discussion on what war means for the world; and what it will mean in the…

    • 734 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Why Is War Bad

    • 1074 Words
    • 5 Pages

    There is no doubt that war is bad. but they are part of our reality. They exist because humans have not been able, after thousands of years of supposed civilization, to agree on basic issues of coexistence. It is the greatest catastrophe that can occur to humans. It brings death and destruction, the slaughter without mercy and carnage, disease and hunger, poverty and ruin in its wake.…

    • 1074 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays