Induction In David Hume's Argument

Great Essays
One very impressive attack on Hume’s argument, trying to solve it with its definition, is as follows. The first premise of the argument is challenged, which is “if we want induction to be rationally justified, induction must be reliable.” Since the definition of deduction is based on the validity of an argument, which is assumed to be reliable, why couldn’t reliability be a part of the definition of induction? Induction is defined to be reliable in this attack. However, reliability cannot be a part of the definition because it is a way to evaluate those methods, such as deduction and induction. The criteria for the evaluation is a totally different idea than the method itself. An analogy useful to understand this is that the recipe for a course …show more content…
If induction cannot take reliability as a definition because a method cannot be defined as reliable by definition, deduction must not be seen as reliable by definition as well, because deduction should also be treated as a methodology and same as induction. What is the difference between deduction and induction that makes deduction automatically true and we need to prove the reliability of induction to use it? Ideally, we also need to prove the legitimacy of the deduction before using it as a reliable way. We normally don’t do that. Someone may say that deduction is true by logic. Then the same question comes again. How do we know that the logic is reliable except for we intuitively think it is? This may seem to be question begging, but that is how things naturally go if you doubt the legitimacy of the basic methodology we use. You start to doubt everything. In this way, if the reliability of deduction is in doubt, there is no way that we can use the deduction to prove the unreliability of induction. Then the foundation of the problem of induction is broken, because the problem of induction is an argument made in the form of deduction. The existence of the problem of induction needs the method of deduction to be

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Hume is a philosopher who is skeptical of miracles in any form. The first argument behind Hume’s skepticism is surrounded by the idea of a priori. A priori is having knowledge or a belief based on one’s thought alone, independent from experience. This is simply believing what you have heard from a separate source, or one’s own hypothesis, without proof.…

    • 1950 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    James and Pascal’s defences of faith in some of their most famous arguments, specifically Pascal’s, devalue faith by making faith selfish, providing an obvious out to faith, and making the decision of faith into a gamble, oddly, his devaluation of faith does not hurt his argument, it makes it easier to convince the skeptics. To prove that Pascal’s argument devalues faith and to understand why it doesn’t negatively affect his argument, it’s necessary to understand the whole argument. His argument can be split into quite a few premises. He starts with the possibility of God, which is the main idea of his argument. Basically, it’s possible that God does exists, and it’s also possible that God does not exist, something nearly everyone agrees on.…

    • 1025 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    David Hume's Argument

    • 245 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Hume begins his argument by asserting that animals, just like humans, learn from experience and come to infer causal connections between events. Hume describes this principle by saying: “[animals] become acquainted with the more obvious properties of eternal objects, and gradually, from their birth, treasure up a knowledge of the nature of fire, water, earth, stones, heights, depths, &c. and of the effect, which result from their operation” (Hume, 70). In order to illustrate his point, Hume cites several examples: horses learn what heights they can safely leap, and dogs learn to fear the sight of a whip (Hume, 70). Furthermore, Hume claims that non-human animals certainly do not learn to make these inferences by means of reason or argument.…

    • 245 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Saint Thomas Aquinas was a philosopher in the 13th century credited with his philosophical works: Summa Theologiae and Summa Contra Gentiles. These were used as a basis of Christian theology for early theologians. In these works, Aquinas spells out what is known as “The Five Ways.” This is a series of five arguments that Aquinas believed to prove the existence of God using the facts one can observe in the world. Two of the arguments used are the argument from motion and the argument from design.…

    • 967 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Paley’s argument for the Existence of God Paley’s argument is termed the design argument which is solely based on an analogy of a watch. This is that the universe as a whole is complex and there must be an intelligent designer responsible for designing the universe. Just like the watch, the parts come together to fulfill a purpose, and if we have never seen a watch before the complexity or the way the watch was designed would make us conclude that it was made by an intelligent designer. This analogy is used to compare the universe to the watch. In addition, he mentions that “it is not necessary that a machine be perfect in order to show with what design it was made” (Paley, 2) some errors in the production of the watch does not conclude that…

    • 948 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Philosophy has been plagued with the subject of religion since the dawn of time. Each philosopher having their own opinions, many attempts have been made to prove and disprove their opinion and the opinions of others. The existence of God, a single, supreme being who created the heavens and the earth, is a controversial topic, but even among those who believe in the existence of God, finding a way to explain such existence has been nigh impossible. An 18th century philosopher, David Hume attempted to establish his opinion on the existence of God by critiquing the widely accepted ideals set forth by Descartes.…

    • 1206 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When it comes to the position of the existence of God, several arguments are debated. The cosmological argument, according to the text, holds the position that the universe exists and that something outside of the universe is required to explain its existence; that something being God (Pojman, 57). William Paley presented an inductive, teleological argument in which he believes that we complex beings didn’t occur naturally, thus, the universe must have an intelligent designer (class notes). An opposing position, argued by Hume (Cleanthes), presented several arguments to discredit Paley’s position on the existence of God. Though both men held unique points of views from their arguments, I believe that Hume did a better job at discrediting Paley’s teleological argument and showing exactly where it failed.…

    • 511 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    While closely analyzing this subject, he comes to the realization that it is faulty. Hume’s argument is strong because of the premises he creates to from his conclusion. The principle of induction being faulty is the case due to, attempting to prove its existence invalidates itself, inferences…

    • 1178 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Sometimes called the Teleological Argument (‘telos’ in Greek means ‘purpose’), the Design Argument is one of the oldest, most prevalent and most popular out of all the arguments for the existence of God that have been created throughout the years. Ever since it was first recorded in Greek philosophy by Xenophon in 390 BCE, various forms of the argument have been put forth by many different respected philosophers of their respective times from Thomas Aquinas in the Middle Ages to Richard Swinburne in the modern day. Comparatively, however, many notable philosophers have also put forth criticisms such as David Hume and Richard Dawkins. In this essay, I will be examining the different forms of the argument and discussing the criticisms against…

    • 2079 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    William Paley’s design argument starts with the assumption that if something is designed, there must be a designer. Paley says that the universe didn’t have to be like this, and that how everything works together for a purpose indicates design, so therefore, there has to be a designer, that is God. However, the philosopher David Hume states in his work „Critique of the Design Argument“ some objections that he has against Paley’s Argument. For one, Hume criticizes that the watch analogy is weak, because the universe has no similarities to a watch and you can’t compare a man-made object to a whole universe.…

    • 430 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In the book, Hume states that if a man had different shades of blue set in front of his eyes with one shade missing, it would be capable for the person to conceive the last shade of blue without ever experiencing it. Hume displaces this rebuttal because he believes it is insignificant and the only one that can argue against his claim. What comes to mind for me in for a counterargument to this claim is the thought of an inner voice and the thought of the self which I believe is innate in everyone. When I speaking of an inner voice I’m not just talking about anyone but for someone who is deaf. When someone is deaf they have no impression to recall from for an inner voice.…

    • 1100 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Reasoning for Reason Rene Descartes and David Hume are both philosophers and their various works have had an impact in the world of philosophy. In this paper, I will argue that Hume’s position on reason is better than Descartes’ because it makes more sense logically whereas Descartes’ position is based on something that cannot be scientifically proven. In Descartes’ opinion, everything you believe should be based on a solid, rational foundation. He explains that he, “had to raze everything to the ground and begin again from the original foundations” (AT 7:17) to fulfill his belief.…

    • 1119 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    By making observations it will lead you to a conclusion most of the time. Inductive reasoning also has its weaknesses. One of them are the fact that it is very limited. You might think with the observations you did your conclusions must be certain but by simply making further observations you can now prove those old conclusions wrong. That is also why there is aways changes in many scientific conclusions, other people just observe further and prove old conclusions are wrong.…

    • 1195 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Deductive logic attempts to create valid reasoning that will make it “impossible for the inferences based upon these reasons to be false” (Popkin and Stroll, 239).This means that if reasons are given and if these reasons are valid and are deemed to be true then the inferences made are conclusive. To better understand this, one may further dissect the two forms of an argument. Deductive reasoning is one of the most basic forms of valid reasoning. A deductive syllogism typically begins with a general statement that is the hypothesis. This hypothesis is used to examine the possibilities to reach a specific, logical conclusion.…

    • 1512 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Conclusion: Therefore, tomorrow morning the sun will rise. The conclusion drawn in this problem is reached through an inductive inference that the future will resemble the past. Hume argues that we cannot know that the future will resemble the past. Consequently, we cannot use inductive logic to reach…

    • 820 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays