Rational Reasoning And Deductive Logic

Better Essays
Rational Thinking According to Popkin and Stroll, logic can be defined as the most fundamental branch of philosophy that “deals with the nature of thinking itself” (237). However, the depth of understanding logic is so much more than ethical speculations and metaphysics. Whether or not something is deemed logical, depends on how consistent and coherent any particular piece of that reasoning is, as logic attempts to distinguish good reasoning from bad reasoning. This then can determine whether an argument is valid or invalid, and furthermore allows one to establish conclusive inferences about an argument. By understanding the structure of the relationships between concepts and ideas and by utilizing empirical evidence from experiences to ensure …show more content…
Deductive logic attempts to create valid reasoning that will make it “impossible for the inferences based upon these reasons to be false” (Popkin and Stroll, 239).This means that if reasons are given and if these reasons are valid and are deemed to be true then the inferences made are conclusive. To better understand this, one may further dissect the two forms of an argument. Deductive reasoning is one of the most basic forms of valid reasoning. A deductive syllogism typically begins with a general statement that is the hypothesis. This hypothesis is used to examine the possibilities to reach a specific, logical conclusion. In contrast, inductive reasoning makes broad generalizations from specific observations. From many observations, a pattern is discerned, a generalization is made, and an explanation or theory is inferred. It is often a prediction from the past about the future. From many observations, a person is able to interpret facts to support his or her theories. If a person uses experience or reason, they can justify their beliefs to get to …show more content…
To further dissect the syllogism we must note that each argument has a subject, in this case “Robee” is the subject. The syllogistic argument also has a predicate term and a copula. Logic deals only with declarative sentences that are used for the purpose of making assertions. To declare that all dogs have four legs and that since Robee is a dog, it is only valid to assume that Robee has four legs as well, just like all other dogs. The major and minor premise must coincide to yield a conclusion; this one of the rules that should always be applied when observing a syllogistic argument. One must use good reasoning when creating a logical statement. To look at the big picture, since logic deals with correct reasoning and since correctness of reasoning is closely related with truth and falsity, then when one reasons correctly, “if the premises of his/her argument are true, then it will be impossible for the conclusion to be false” (Popkin and Stroll, 243) because the statement is valid. Validity is the structure of an argument. Once the validity of an argument is established, one can acquire justified true belief. A belief is when a person thinks something to be the case, when their either may or may not be empirical evidence to prove it with certainty. Once that truth is established, then one has reason to believe in the validity of

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    In this paper I intend to support the claim that reason is the best guide in determining right from wrong. I intend to demonstrate that reason is important as it helps us defend our beliefs and judgements of right from wrong. Having reasons guide us will help answer our moral questions about right and wrong. With logical reasoning, we are able to use our hard thinking to lead us to making our choice of right from wrong. As individuals we make judgements about different action if whether they’re right or wrong.…

    • 774 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Logic And Reasoning Essay

    • 912 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Acquiring knowledge, in a way is acquiring reasoning to support or establish a claim. Knowledge is acquired by nonsensory experience and sensory experience. But there are two types of logic which have been subdivided into two categories deductive logic and inductive logic. Inductive logic places a high regard towards the soundness of an argument while deductive reasoning is not as blatant and requires more critical thinking. Deductive reasoning proclaims that if reasons given are accurate, then it is infeasible for the claim to be false.…

    • 912 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    For the argument (∑, A) every premise in ∑ is true, and A is true. 3. Logical validity versus inductive validity Inductive valid argument is an argument based on the thought that the founding premises provide reasons to support the apparent truth of the conclusion. In such arguments, the intention of the premises is to be strong such that if the premises are true then there is unlikelihood of the conclusion being false. Logical validity on the other hand can be defined as the property possessed by an argument if it meets the following condition: if the premises are true, then the conclusions should as well be true.…

    • 1882 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Truths that are attained by reason are to be broken down into elements which intuition can grasp, which, through a purely deductive process, will result in clear truths about reality. This is why he argued that a being who can think and rationalise for themselves must…

    • 1549 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The quest for truth is both attractive and daunting. Logic provides us with a framework and systematic method of identifying arguments and following through to truth or falsehood. Through logical reasoning, we can identify what we might objectively agree upon, and what is subject to our interpretation. The effectiveness of our truth-seeking lies in our understanding of certainty, probability, truth that is demonstrable and non-demonstrable, and differentiation between our emotional and logical responses to persuasion. One of the largest obstacles to truth-seeking is the fallacy of all-out relativism, and the qualification of our emotional responses as reasonable.…

    • 1542 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Exercise 1. A deductive argument may be (a) Valid and sound 2. A valid, deductive argument may have (a) true premises and a true conclusion (b) False Premises and a True Conclusion 3. An inductive argument logically guarantees the truth of its conclusion (b) False 4. In deductive reasoning is when you provide premises that are presume to be true to get a guarantee truth of the conclusion in order to be valid.…

    • 1871 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    This prioritizes the essential characteristics offered in the definition. The presupposition is that the definition of must be true for it to be good. It follows that the property of a belief and/or the justification of it cannot make it true. Properties are determinants of the truth value. We therefore require an intrinsic connection to truth.…

    • 1068 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The standard analysis of knowledge is the Tripartite Theory (or, JTB, for short). This theory defines knowledge as ‘justified true belief’: S knows that P if and only if (i) P is true, (ii) S believes that P, and (iii) S is justified in believing that P. Each of these three conditions (truth, belief, and justification) is necessary for knowledge, and altogether they are jointly sufficient for having knowledge. As a counter to JTB, Edmund Gettier posed a serious challenge when he introduced the Gettier problem. The Gettier problems are cases of situations in which a person has a justified true belief that fails to be knowledge. Lets look at one case.…

    • 924 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Truth Is Good Analysis

    • 1528 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Significant truth is truth that we actively want to pursue, after accounting for our preferences (Lynch 52). This narrows down the number of truths down to ones that you feel that should be pursued. Lynch also says that significant truth also depends on the good of believing the truth…

    • 1528 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    They will state reasons, which tell us about the importance of the claim and the argument, and they will provide counterexamples, which are used to disprove a point using evidence. And through that they will use justification, which is use of good reason and why you should believe it. Taking all of this into account when looking at the argument as a whole, how can you tell if the argument is valid? It is valid if and only if it is impossible for the premises to be true and the conclusion to be false. Now, what…

    • 754 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays

Related Topics