Ontological Argument In Proving The Existence Of God

Improved Essays
How successful is the Ontological Argument in Proving the Existence of God? For centuries, the existence of God has been questioned and argued by many different philosophers. One of the “big three” arguments is the Ontological Argument, an argument that could be said to be valid, as it has a good structure, but the soundness is questionable. The argument was founded by St Anselm (1033-1109) on the basis of two things: firstly, that God is “that than which nothing greater can be conceived” , which means that God is the most superior being that can possibly be imagined; he is omnipotent (all-powerful), omniscient (all-seeing), benevolent (all-loving), omnipresent (present everywhere) and eternal (always existing). Secondly, that existence is a perfection; existence is superior to non-existence. Once these two premises are accepted, the only logical conclusion can be that God exists, as God is the most superior being in every way. To believe that God could just be a being that exists only in our minds would be a misunderstanding of the definition of God. This is not an argument that has persuaded many of the …show more content…
The structure of a deductive argument is a set of general premises that lead to a specific conclusion. Deductive arguments are a priori, meaning that it occurs before the need for any experience; it is the understanding of the definition of the word “God” that creates the Ontological Argument. Deductive arguments are said to be stronger than inductive arguments, which are based on experience, making them a posteriori. Inductive arguments are made up from a set of specific premises that lead to a general conclusion, whereas deductive arguments are based on facts that have been proved. Inductive arguments, being based on experience, are stronger the more they are

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In this paper I will explain and evaluate two popular arguments regarding the existence of God, A Scientific Argument for the Existence of God by Robin Collins and The Inductive Argument from Evil Against the Existence of God by William Rowe; then I will discuss how the conclusions are not compatible with one another due to the conflicting structure of the conclusions as well as how one cannot accept both conclusions without compromising one of the arguments. First I will explain the basis of Collins’ argument, which is one of the most frequently used arguments in favor of theism. In A Scientific Argument for the Existence of God, Collins centers around the observation of how finely tuned the physical constants of the universe are to the ability for any form of life to exist, if any of them were to change even the smallest bit then no life would possibly be able to develop not to…

    • 1636 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To another individual, God may exist simply because of the evidence around them. I think the existence…

    • 1204 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In order for a God to be supremely perfect, he must have be divine in power, omnipotent, and possess all attributes in absolute perfection. The critical part of this argument is that God has perfection in all things, included in these perfections is existence. For if God were to lack existence, he would be lacking in some aspect, and not possess true perfection, for it is greater to exist than to not exist. Therefore, in order for God to be perfect, and to be all powerful, existence is a necessary part of him.…

    • 1274 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Anselm is best known for the arguments he provided in regards to the existence of God. He especially contributed to what today is known as the “ontological argument”, or an argument about the state of existing or being. Anselm provides many reasonable arguments for the existence of God, and had an avid ability to explain reason behind it. Through Cur Deus Homo, he tries to rationalize God’s method for saving the world through Christ’s death as satisfaction, Anselm has been able to offer a significant view and meaning that many Christians today follow by providing a definition for the significance of Jesus’ death on the cross.…

    • 711 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Deductive reasoning is based on specific evidence in order to prove that an individual is guilty of an offence. Inductive reasoning, also called inductive logic, is reasoning that goes beyond what we actually know in order to make a conclusion. Deductive reasoning is done with actual evidence while inductive reasoning is based on a proposition. The textbook give a great example of inductive reasoning, “All of john Wayne Gacy’s victims found to date were male-so Gacy did not kill females”. It uses information that has been obtained in order to further solve the problem.…

    • 144 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Ontological Argument and Pascal’s Wager The “Ontological Argument” was created by Saint Anselm; this argument is in support of God’s existence. His argument is one based on observation and reason not on empirical evidence and is spit in to three parts. The parts include why god exists, why god cannot be thought to not exist, and lastly why atheists are able to think that God does not exist. In the first section he begins with a definition of God that he believes everyone would be accepting of and that cannot be disputed.…

    • 1583 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    His argument states that God is the most perfect thing possible. After defining god as the greatest conceivable thing he asks “what is greater god as an idea or god as an existing thing?” if it is agreed that existing is always better than not existing god as an existing being is greater than god as an idea, therefore god must exist as if god is just an idea then he is not the most perfect conceivable thing. God must exist by…

    • 784 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1. Deductive reasoning is that process of reasoning in which one moves from the general premise to the specific one. The truth of the conclusion depends on the truth of the premises. Inductive reasoning instead is the process of reasoning that begins with the specific then moves to the general. Abductive reasoning is an explanation of some experienced or observation of events but you cannot explain the event or do not have knowledge.…

    • 823 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Both the cosmological and theological arguments are based on inductive reasoning which main purpose is to build evidence to persuade us to believe, but still lacks proof. Therefore this makes them a posteriori meaning the truth is going to be accepted after looking at the evidence for example other galaxies have life the only way this is proven to be true is after having the evidence. On the other hand the ontological argument is taken from deductive reasoning which tends to accept that if the premises are true therefore they have to be accepted as true. This makes the argument a priory meaning it can be true without actually having valid proof for example If Paul is a bachelor then he is unmarried.…

    • 731 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Anselm’s Ontological Argument Anselm creates the Ontological argument with one primary goal. He claims to succeed in developing an argument of the existence of God without the requirement of actual proof. Anselm 's reasoning and argument only gives a mere opinion on the topic of the existence of God. He formulates a two part hypothesis consisting of: God exists and God has always existed. Anselm’s Ontological argument expresses accusations that are simply in his favor or his outlook on God.…

    • 836 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the piece of Ontological Argument, St. Anselm argues that being able to exist in both reality and in understanding is the best to humans. He specifically focuses on the topic of an omnient God. He does use a reducto in his argument, so part of the premises contradict, but this contradiction strengthens the proof for the conclusion. I agree with his point of view. St. Anselm refers back to the difference between conceiving in concept vs in realty, all though out his writing.…

    • 778 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Deductive Argument

    • 143 Words
    • 1 Pages

    A deductive argument would be when the premise is true and you have facts to support the premise so ,the conclusion has to be true too. If I were to say that all medications have side effects and that Losartan is a medication; therefore, Losartan has side effects. An inductive argument would be when the premise is true but there are no facts to support it so, the conclusion may be true or false. Beth eats fish and Beth is a woman;therefore,all women eat fish. I actually watch television commercials sometimes in order to figure out the reasoning or logic,if there is any, behind the commercial.…

    • 143 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    An example of deductive logic is all whales are mammals, Johnny is a whale, and therefore Johnny is a mammal. An example of inductive logic is, mostly all freshmans have a job, and Sarah is a freshman, so Sarah has a job. If you look at both examples you can infer that the deductive argument leaves no room for error because it shows a sense of certainty. On the other hand, if you look at the inductive argument you can notice that the word most was used and makes the argument likely, but not certain. Now, you can visualize that deductive arguments are necessary and inductive logic is probable.…

    • 755 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Reading Assignment One Inductive and deductive reasoning are two different processes that are used in order to solve problems. Both inductive and deductive reasoning have different methods of getting to a conclusion however when solving a problem often both processes are incorporated. Two different reading from Christopher Alexander and Ian L Mcharg help show the differences between Inductive and deductive reasoning. Question one…

    • 1426 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Deductive logic attempts to create valid reasoning that will make it “impossible for the inferences based upon these reasons to be false” (Popkin and Stroll, 239).This means that if reasons are given and if these reasons are valid and are deemed to be true then the inferences made are conclusive. To better understand this, one may further dissect the two forms of an argument. Deductive reasoning is one of the most basic forms of valid reasoning. A deductive syllogism typically begins with a general statement that is the hypothesis. This hypothesis is used to examine the possibilities to reach a specific, logical conclusion.…

    • 1512 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays