More So Than Deontology, Consequentialism Appeals And Modern Intuitions About Morality

1027 Words Sep 26th, 2016 5 Pages
This writing piece will define and discuss the statement, “More so than deontology, consequentialism appeals to modern intuitions about morality.” I shall explain why I believe this statement is not true basing my argument in two main postulates.
To properly explain the meaning of this statement, there are four main concepts we need to clearly understand, namely, deontology, consequentialism, modern institutions, and morality. Deontology is defined by Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy as the moral theory that establishes what we should do and evaluate our choices whether they are allowed, required or forbidden (2007). In other words, it bases morality on the adherence to the rules. On the other hand, according to the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy consequentialism establishes that the moral rightness of an action depends only on the nature of its consequences (2003). Social institutions such as religion, family, and politics are established to set behavioral norms and served as a system that supports society structure. Finally, morality refers to the guidelines of conduct that are established by a society or a group.
Now that I have defined those terms, I can explain the meaning of the statement which is that consequentialism utilizes social institutions to define morality to a greater degree than deontology. In other words, the morality of consequentialism relies more on social institution than the morality of deontology. I strongly disagree with this statement…

Related Documents