Immanuel Kant's Categorical Analysis

Great Essays
For some time, ethics have always been a concern in the world. The notions of right and wrong, good and evil, have always been contemplated; with every person individually devising their own unique idea of what they believe is moral. Morality in the world generally gravitates towards virtue, while hatred and evil are looked down upon. However, there are those that believe that goodness is not simply acts of kindness, nor is it innately there in humans to begin with. Eighteenth century German philosopher Immanuel Kant solidified his thoughts on morality, and created a step-by-step, systematic plan for the human being to follow in order to achieve goodness. Kant’s theory has had its impact in the world of philosophy and his
categorical
…show more content…
There is the belief of separate and differing consciences and notions of morality, but then there is the belief of one unified ideal moral reality, where simple, consistent maxims become an omnipresent, all-including law. Immanuel Kant, with the use of his categorical imperative, eliminated any confusions or contradicting maxims and created the outline and expectations of humans to form The Kingdom of Ends. What is right to one must be right to and followed by all
Chan 6 for it to hold any validity, free of exceptions. In his three-part imperative, Kant laid out his systematic, intricately designed steps on how to exist as a moral being. By conceding and assimilating into their lives this imperative: abiding by a maxim and treating it as universal law, never acting in self-interest and treating oneself or others as mere tools for meeting some ends, and harmonizing one’s maxim with moral reality, fulfilling all three of a human’s requirements, one can attain that goodness. By comprehending and accepting this systematic process, meshing it into one’s life, a purpose is

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Maimonides’ theologically-inspired interpretation of rule-utilitarianism draws in foundation from a precept he devotes much ink to settling the merits of:…

    • 782 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    We have two ways in which we judge morality. One is according to our own standards and we use these standards to judge other cultures and the other one is by judging…

    • 1497 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    as a capacity to recognize right and wrong refers to a person’s general awareness of that some things are right and some things are wrong. The capacity is the basic orientation of humans towards good. Conscience as a moral reasoning is seeking moral wisdom (the truth) from sources outside of your own through learning about moral issues, values, to act according to your conscience and reason correctly in moral situations. Conscience as a judgement means evaluating all factors and making a commitment to follow through with it. In this sense the decision is based on personal perception and values of the individual. The conscience that involves being true to yourself. The “secret core and sanctuary” where we are alone with God.” as said by the Vatican Council.…

    • 866 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Immanuel Kant On Duty

    • 1621 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Philosophy is a discipline that studies how one ought to live, as well as study reality, nature, existence, etc. However, there are a number of philosophers who propose differing sets of morals and have different ideas of living life to its fullest (Singer v. Mill). Kant proposes that moral actions are defined by the motivation of an action, and later on explains that moral actions are duties through reason, rather than inclination. This essay will explain the validity of Kant’s argument by first explaining Kant’s view on duty, then analyse his view of duty as an object of good will, which pertains to motivations without the slightest selfishness, then argue for moral duties motivated by duty instead of inclination based on reason.…

    • 1621 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are many different views of morality. There is the moral objectivism view, which states that there are general moral principles that apply to everyone. Then there is the moral absolutism view which is basically the same thing as moral objectivism but in…

    • 743 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One such example of this is the concept of being human, in particular the moral…

    • 675 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This means, that if we presuppose a certain level of agreement on some universally desirable traits- such as empathy and fairness- we can begin to construct a working definition of “Moral Enhancement”.…

    • 589 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Secondly, be able to then decide a path to take based upon ethics. This is to rid ourselves of the self-serving bias and instead let ourselves be seen by others as objective as well as by ourselves. This can be evident in the code of conduct and ethics from our employers by comparing out ethics to those of our employers. Thirdly they must want to make a decision that is in fact ethical. The six categories of rationalization which we would like to ignore because they distract from our decision making are denial of responsibility, injury, victim, social weighting, appeal to higher loyalties, and metaphor of the ledger; by appealing to these categories of rationalization we can lose focus of our end goal. Lastly they must be able to have both the courage and the motivation to act based on the information they’ve accumulated. Moral action itself is composed of ownership, efficiency, and…

    • 1037 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    strong sense of responsibility. People are convinced of a moral ideal, moral principles and norms…

    • 483 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    By redefining their morals, they can rationalize any situation. For example, one person can think lying is wrong but another person can think its right. They could rationalize their action by thinking lying helped them obtain an opportunity so it was alright to tell a lie. In our culture today, people believe others can have different opinions and views on ethical matters. This is okay to an extent because God made us all unique in our thinking. However, this thinking hits its limit when it is used to rationalize a wrongdoing. An err in the worldview is the inability to apply this thinking to concrete terms. One cannot say they are a cat because they believe they are a cat. But of course, they believe truth is relative and not absolute.…

    • 431 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Thomas Aquinas Immorality

    • 223 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Thomas Aquinas’s “Treatise of Law” describes the ways in which humans structure their societies, specifically in terms of law. According to his conclusions, there are four classifications of law that humans obey in a top-down system; the eternal law, divine law, natural law, and human law. Humans act in accordance with eternal law, or God’s everlasting plan for the world’s inhabitants, via natural law. Since all laws are derived from God, Aquinas claims that every law is directed towards a “commonly good” society, or society driven to achieve overall happiness. Therefore, man’s response to laws, even if they are individually immoral, serve as these contributions towards common good.…

    • 223 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    James Q Wilson once said, “Man’s moral sense is not a strong beacon light…it is, rather, a small candle flame…flickering and sputtering in the strong winds of power and passion, greed and ideology” (Amstutz 9). Morality refers to a person’s values and beliefs about what is right and wrong, just and unjust, and fair and unfair. However, the concept of morality is more nuanced that its definition, given the multiple factors that inform a person’s moral compass—such as, their religion—and the many influences that cause a person’s moral candle flame to flicker and eventually die out, like power, greed, and ideology.…

    • 756 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    addition you must act as if the maxims will become universal law through your will. The next…

    • 944 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    134); this stems from the constant pursuit of a morally valuable and just life, basing decisions on this ideal can rule out the best possible outcome for others.…

    • 1477 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In order to understand the reality or the fiction of objective morality it is crucial to first understand the meaning of objective morality. Like with many philosophical terms; by no means is there a definitive meaning of objective morality. Objective morality could be considered as an ideal of a system of ethics, with set moral judgements, is factually correct rather than just correct because of subjective opinion. The claim of being “objective” usually correlates to what a person believes to be subjectively true. The consensus on objective morality is that most believe in the idea of every person being born with an innate sense of objective morality and it is eternally grounded with good and bad. This innate sense is rooted within us by an alleged source known as God and is then developed via experiences, societies, and support systems. The concept of objective morality can be dated back to earlier philosophical literature such as Plato’s republic but also arises in various modern topics such as murder, religion, and science.…

    • 1123 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays