Moral Ethics: Kantian Deontology Theory And Kant

Better Essays
INTRODUCTION
The ethical decision is challenging and probably blurry for decision-makers. Mostly, it creates a dilemma where fierce antagonism arises from listening to the voice of conscience and the voices of other opinions surrounding. Profoundly, the winner is determined by how willing the person to pursue the goodness and choose freely to pay attention to the inner voice or mute it. Moral philosophers are contributing in providing an instrument to enable us to heed to the verdict of conscience, by which will be the compass through the decision stages. Kant analogizes the role of the moral philosopher to reveal the ambiguous perception of what it is moral to be clearer and shimmers dazzlingly.
This paper will tackle the Kantian Deontology
…show more content…
The voice of conscience acts as a moral sensor, which is triggered whenever we face an ethical behaviour and fires the alarm once the morality is breached. Utterly, It is up to our will whether to listen irresistibly to the voice that Kant calls it “moral predisposition” or mute it consequently leading to immoral behaviour. The previous argument explains the moral law imposed by Kant. Furthermore, he emphasised that people are rational beings act according to their …show more content…
The first formulation tackles the universalizability; Kant sees morality as the objective law of motives and reasons. Accordingly, persons are rational beings that acting based on morals. Thus, a person must assimilate his subjective will compared to the objective law of motives and reasons. The locus of control of the manager necessitates protecting the interests of his team and the company by monitoring and enforcing the ethical behaviour and decide the disciplinary action in case of immoral conduct. The immoral resignation had exposed the team unity to a risk and breached the implicit social contract between the individual and the team. Besides, violating the notice period condition in the employment contract. Likewise,

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    This is why Kant thinks you cannot measure the morality of an action by its outcome. He believed that the good intentions we have to execute an action is what really matters. In his theory he stated that we should treat…

    • 3463 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Ethical ideologies are inherent and play a vital role in our decision to make moral decisions and whether or not those decisions are right or wrong. Two major philosophers that proposed two theories of ethics that gave an understand of what is right or wrong are Kant and Nagel. Kant theorized that the rightness or wrongness of actions doesn’t depend on our consequences but on whether we fulfill our duty. Nagel proposed the idea of Moral Luck and said that Moral Luck occurs when we judge an agent or assign moral blame or praise for an action or it’s consequences even if it is clear that an agent had no control in the situation. Through the theory of Moral Luck there are four types of non-moral luck that play a factor in the morality of an action…

    • 1147 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    We may reason why exactly or the many different scenarios where an action or duty may appear moral at first glance, what W.D. Ross may call “prima facie duties”, but not necessarily after careful consideration. Nevertheless, according to Hume it is that emotional feeling that makes us determine what is right or wrong, morally. Finally, being skeptic there is no surprise David Hume, makes the claim there is no such thing as absolute morality, but all morality judgments are subjective. Immanuel Kant’s view on morality is centered primarily around his notion of duty.…

    • 1013 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Therefore I think that people are divided on what is right and wrong. The criticism of Kant is fair, because Kant does not give us a full explanation or a decent argument about moral duty, therefore Schiller is ‘mocking’ Kant. Schiller wrote his critique to show that Kant was not explaining how moral duty worked. He also started to criticise Kant, but Kant wanted to say that we had an inclination towards having the right to moral duty. Furthermore Kant’s criticism goes on to allow us to have a deeper idea of the right to moral duty.…

    • 2052 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Kantian ethics, the moral philosophy established by Immanual Kant in his work Fundamental Principles of the Metaphysics of Morals, is centered around the idea of the “categorical imperative”, the principle that certain actions are strictly prohibited, despite the potential for the prohibited action to bring about more good than the alternative. Kant believed that since humans have the ability to reason, they must use their rationale to determine what these unwavering truths, or moral duties, are. For Kant, if humans act in accordance with these moral duties, and not out of preference, instinct or desire, they are in turn acting with moral worth. This ethical outline can be applied to the case of Ben and Tyler, two buddies whose friendship is…

    • 905 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Kantian ethics, on the other hand, would approach the action in question from a contrasting viewpoint. Because Kant’s deontological theory claims that rightness of our actions are dependent upon whether or not the actions in play fulfill our moral duties, it's crucial to note that Kant believed moral duties derived from two formulations of the categorical imperative. In Case 1, the principles that govern the foundation of Kantian ethics would emphasize that it would be morally correct to give your loved one the letter. Kantian ethics differ from Utilitarianism in that it excludes the notion of taking outcomes into consideration. In such a case, its ideology would not…

    • 970 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Kant pronounced the need of the set of tenets of behavior and regulations which would give us the chance to settle on the right decision. This capacity to choose which looks like freedom from the first site swings to be a liability on the shoulder of the humankind as opportunity means obligation. Kant states that better or more terrible, activities can be performed to accomplish the more terrible or better result and this places us in the position of good situation where picking worse, one can hurt others and the other way around. Also, the activities we perform after these reflections and contemplations are resisted as moral activities by Kant. Moral activities for him are the activities, where reasons stay sooner than takes after and…

    • 1016 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Indeed, both ideologies differ in who is part of the moral community and how they gain the moral status. First of all, Kant’s view establishes that in order to someone forms part of a moral community have to be autonomous and rational. Kant’s theory excludes infants, animals, sever mentally ill and mentally retarded. In the other hand, utilitarians use as a guideline the slogan of Jeremy Bentham. They think that if a being is capable to suffer, they gain the entry to the moral community.…

    • 880 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Kant bases his theory on the claim that morality has support from the intentions of one’s action (104), while de Waal’s claim says emotions are the actual foundation of morality. To be more clear, de Waal wants to say that emotion effect our convictions and convictions, according to de Waal, are essential to anything morality (18). While Kant clearly emphasizes his stance on morality when he says, “A good will is not good because of what it effects or accomplishes,” (104). In other words,…

    • 1038 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    According to Immanuel Kant, conscientious people strive to preserve their moral integrity. This goal requires their external behavior match with their consciences internal dictates what they perceive to be morally right and feel driven to do. In the morally diverse world, conscientious persons may come into conflict with each other and with society’s moral values. Conflicts of conscience are a standard feature of the moral life except for the amoral sociopath. Resolving these conflicts is a big challenge even for the extreme relativists.…

    • 880 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays