Moral Change: The Changing Attitudes Of Animals

Improved Essays
George, while you make good points about a moral change occurring and playing a large part in the changing attitudes of animals; I believe this change is far more anthropocentric rather than based on morals. One of the main arguments from the reading was, (as you quoted), "those who began by torturing cats and dogs would end by murdering their fellows". To me that seems to be incredibly anthropocentric, as there is actually no mention, or concern, for the wellbeing of animals, instead it is focused on how this would effect humans. It all seems to be about stopping humans from hurting or killing other humans. This is especially shown as it was deemed wrong to harm animals that have human qualities, because it would be one stop short from harming other humans. …show more content…
All these points are based solely on human concerns and not out of morals. Going on from this, this anthropocentric rather than moral viewpoint is still very much so persistent in today's society: for example vegetarians still choosing to eat fish, as they are not shown to be similar to ourselves, and therefore it is not considered wrong to eat them as it will not inspire violence amongst humans. Although, in today's society, morals do play the largest part in the protection of animals, it still gets its bases from the early modern periods anthropocentric

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Although humans have evolved to the point where we can devote some attention to honoring the animals that help us build our society, we should not degenerate our society to account for their feelings. One such story of degeneration is of Kevin Martin, a man whose research of AIDS medication was halted by the Swiss Health Department on account of an ethic review that had already been approved by other organizations.(Yong 39) Another example are animals farmed for meat consumption. Although ultimately, they are born just to die, they aren't killed for the sake of killing; They are killed to aid human society. As callous as it sounds, animals having more rights would work to stagnate human progress due to extra regulations both legally and…

    • 770 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Regarding Bob Stevens’ response to Rifkin’s editorial “A Change of Heart About Animals”, I would like to point out that Stevens’ arguments are quite weak. Most noticeable is Stevens’ overt use of hyperbole, by which he attempts to poke holes in Rifkin’s writing. While Rifkin simply mentions the practice of providing pigs with toys to keep them happy, Steven’s makes the unnecessary claim that providing pigs with toys shows that they matter more than children, and that this will ultimately lead to children having no toys. Not only is this a fallacy (a slippery slope fallacy to be exact), but this is obviously not true. With all of today’s manufacturers and caring parents, it’s highly unlikely that this sort of thing would happen.…

    • 184 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In response to “A Change of Heart about Animals” Rifkin states that animals are more like us than we imagined. He also says that “researchers are finding is that many of our fellow creatures are more like us than we had ever imagined.” I honestly disagree with him because I believe that animals should have rights yes, but I disagree with on the fact that wild animals shouldn’t have rights. Now, house pets such as dogs should have rights in the house, obviously, but they shouldn’t have the exact same rights as us humans. Now, I know most of us in this class treat our pets like humans, but does that really mean they should get the exact same rights as us?…

    • 148 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the article, “A change of Hearts about Animals,” by Jeremy Rifkin, he argues that the new findings by scientists show that animals are more similar to humans than we thought. In these findings we see that animals have emotion like they feel pain, get stressed, get happy and feel love like humans do. To support his claim he explains that there are studies that suggest that animals can acquire language skills, use tools, show self-awareness and pass on knowledge to the next generation. Through stating that animals are more like humans he wants humans to treat animals better.…

    • 370 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In the article written by Jeremy Rifkin titled “A Change of Heart about Animals,” Rifkin argues that researchers have found that animals are similar to humans, which changes our perspectives of them. He elaborates how the research funded by fast food franchises reveal that pigs require mental and physical stimuli to function and how that caused European countries to change the way they treat pigs. The author extends on the similar emotional and cognitive abilities of animals and humans by demonstrating studies on the conceptual abilities of New Caledonian crows and the language abilities of Koko the gorilla. Rifkin continues to describe how animals have self-awareness and understand when they die, as evidenced by observations of orangutans…

    • 119 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    They Hang Horses

    • 284 Words
    • 2 Pages

    What I found to be particularly interesting in the chapter They Hang Horses, Don’t They? was that animals were persecuted in a court of law. That animals were given the same sentences for committing murder as human beings, which was death if they were found to be guilty. In addition, animals received some of the same rights as their human counterparts as they were provided with defense attorneys during their trial. One of the arguments that lawyers presented in court was Genesis 9:7 a verse from the Bible that stated, “Now be fruitful and multiply, and repopulate the earth”.…

    • 284 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Frey cites animals as having lesser value because of their lack of agency, however, the mere fact that animals cannot be moral agents does not exclude them from being moral patients. Humans need to exercise their agency, be morally responsible and give animals consideration because of their status as moral patients and their ability to suffer.3 This…

    • 1239 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Animal Testing Bible

    • 356 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Bible gives many accounts of God telling people how they are to act. God says that people are to be kind and soft natured and loving. The reality is, animal testing foes directly against the claims in the Bible. When the earth was created, God put Adam in the garden and told him to be in charge of everything, this included the animals (Genesis 2:15, English Standard Version). God did not place man in charge of creation to destroy it, He put man in charge to care for it and help it prosper.…

    • 356 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On the other hand, humans must have the capacity for rational autonomy to make moral decisions so they are a part of the moral community (Warriner, 10). For example, humans are rational agents so they have “the ability to deliberate and make autonomous choices” (Warriner, 10). Therefore, morality applies to everyone who is rational and can make autonomous choices, which excludes animals because they lack the rational capacity to make autonomous…

    • 1476 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Contrast Between Animality and Humanity in The Island of Doctor Moreau and Life of Pi One of the major cultural anxieties that prevails in society is the relationship between humans and animals and the distinction between humanity and animality. Humans are often depicted as being a higher form of animal, most commonly induced by religious practices. However, upon isolation or fear of death, the human thought process tends to revert to what is associated to animal-like behaviour. Humans tend to separate themselves from animal life forms as animals are seen as vicious, brutish and capable of committing acts that humans refrain from. Because of this cultural anxiety, much of literature embodies the ideology of animality and humanity and the…

    • 1597 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    To begin with, it won’t be that wrong to say that the idea of “ethics” or “morality” is the only thing that differentiate us (human) animals. Inasmuch as it is important to have a sound ethical system for the existence of a balanced and harmonised society, it is also no less important to acknowledge the fact that we cannot attain objective ethical values without a well defined reference point. Presuming the fallenness of creation, the ability of reason or human cognitive faculty to make ethical choices is severely marred. Therefore, reason cannot be the point of reference if we are to achieve lasting ethical values that would guide us in making sound ethical judgments. It has to come from somewhere (or someone) else that transcends reason and…

    • 1350 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    In Frans de Waal’s Ted Talk, “Moral Behavior in Animals” the speaker discusses the concept of morality that is prevalent in animals and how the morality has been tested and identified. First Waal introduces human morality by using an example of a painting by artist, Hieronymus Bosch, titled, “The Garden of Earthly Delights” which conveys an image of humanity prior to its potential downfall. From this painting, Waal contemplates if morality would exist in humans if they had not been interested in knowledge. Waal shares that as he aged he became intrigued by chimpanzees, which led him to write a book discussing the correlation between the animal kingdom and humanity in terms of competition and aggression.…

    • 1690 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Restraining the rabbits and putting products into their eyes, then leaving it in their eyes for a while until washing it out and checking for ill effects, and this one of the most common methods for testing the cosmetics. We could never dream of using humans in these manners, but we do not tend to think twice when doing something to the non-human animals. The word ‘speciesism’ is used by the Australian philosopher, Peter Singer, to describe we we prefer to our own species over some other species, in the lack of morally relevant differences.…

    • 95 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    They start by bringing up religion and Christians traditional view on the treatment of animals by saying, “Christians believe that man alone is made in God’s image and that animals do not have souls. Thus, by the natural order of things, we can treat animals in any way we like.” They explain how although many people may see this as wrong or argue being against this statement when brought to them, a lot of what we humans do is guided by this principle. This is a good argument to bring on after stating such a strong belief for animal treatment because it shows how some people may fight for animal rights on a certain issue but don’t question any type of animal cruelty in their day to day lives. The authors explain how justification for these actions is easy but finding reasoning against them all may be an…

    • 1020 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Morals In Animal Farm

    • 1439 Words
    • 6 Pages

    "Four legs good, two legs bad" The conflict between four legs good and two legs bad is certainly present in Animal Farm, a novel written by George Orwell a British political novelist born in 1903 who lived in India during the time it was colonized by the British. The novel was first published on August 17 1945 and is an allegory for the Russian Revolution in 1917 and, then on into the Stalin era of Soviet Union. Orwell described Animal Farm as a satirical tale against Stalin. Animal Farm begins with traditional farm animals living on Manor Farm, and are owned by Mr. Jones who does an atrocious job in taking care of his animals. The farm animals rebel and overthrow Mr. Jones and run the farms themselves with one important qualification which…

    • 1439 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays