Monsanto Killing Us Cartoon Analysis

Superior Essays
Cj Gonzalez
Ms. Sharief
English 4
17 May 2015 Killing Us

The image displayed above illustrates a giant hand with the name Monsanto on it strangling a woman who is portrayed as Mother Nature. Monsanto is a company that produces genetically modified foods. What the artist is trying to tell the viewers is that Monsanto is killing the planet with all of its biochemical research and experiments. The element used in this cartoon is hyperbole because it is an exaggeration as to what the fist doing to Mother Nature. Symbolism is also used in this cartoon analysis, the big fist representing Monsanto and the woman representing Mother Nature. If more people saw this, and analyzed it, their minds would open up to what is really happening around them.
…show more content…
In other words, GMOs means that there will be fewer weed flowers; hence, less nectar to attract pollinators leading to no pollination. In addition, lack of other crops means that the toxins that will be released in the plant routes will have fewer bacteria. Soil bacteria form a critical part in the health of soil and crops. The toxins left by the GMO will affect the growth of the plants will affect the biodiversity and the ecosystem. Mono cropping means that the nutrients will not be returned into the soil (Freedman 20). The soil will be dry and devoid of nutrients that are essential in the growing process of crops. Moreover, GMO will create a cycle of dependence to fertilizers, herbicides, and …show more content…
Arguably, corporate control of food consumption, genetic engineering, and overreliance to herbicides and pesticides does not solve the food problem. Therefore, it is critical that farming should be based on ecological farming (Freedman 29). Studies have shown that ecological farming enhances food production as it fosters healthy farming practices. They enable human beings to adapt and mitigate the changes in the climate. Moreover, they are economical as they increase crop yields and production costs, as they are efficient owing to their naturalness. The approach uses the locally available pest control and fertilizers; hence, reducing the cost of production, as well as, increasing yields (Grignon 1a). However, the concerns on the environment and human safety should be researched to ensure that these crops are not harmful.
Proponents of GMO argue that they are effective in pest control as it targets the insects that destroy the crops. However, this destroys other beneficial bacteria and insects such as bees and butterflies. Their argument is that there is no need for the extensive spraying to the entire crops as one needs to target specific insects (Ruse 40). The truth is that ecological farming is critical as it enables the farmers to cope up with climate change, empowering farmers from relying on corporate control, and are

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    Genetically Modified plants and crops help crops to have more resistances to combat the natural disease and less to depend on the pesticides.Then, GM food can combat the human disease. Next, GM food can help crops grow faster. Moreover, GM food can reduce the weather constraints of planting plants and crops.Finally, GM food can become tastier and inspire people to eat the non-popular healthy…

    • 1174 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    GMO Persuasive Essay

    • 647 Words
    • 3 Pages

    However, there has not been enough conclusive evidence to conclude that GMOs are bad for humans. Banning GMOs would not solve a problem like this anyways, as nearly everyone takes in GM soybean products. It could even be argued that GM crops are safer than regular crops if they are designed to be resistant to pests. These plants would not need heavy duty chemicals to protect them, and there would be less damage to the environment around them. Pesticides in runoff can kill organisms that it was not intended for, but with pest resistance built in, pesticides are not needed.…

    • 647 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    GM Crops Pros And Cons

    • 1644 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Here, farmers and biologists who argue in favor of GM crops cite increased yields and a reduced agricultural footprint on the environment as the main reasons to adopt the technology. They reason that the benefits to farm income and the environment directly outweigh any potential negative impacts, and thus are worth the investment. Resting on this belief, U.S. farmers have planted significant amounts of GM corn, soybean, and cotton (Fernandez Cornejo)9. The results on productivity have been promising. For example, planting Bt corn, rather than conventional corn, has increased yields from 12.5 to 26 bushels per acre8.…

    • 1644 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    By using eco energy , the environment will not be harm since eco energy is an alternative way to replace natural resources that humans’ daily life are using. B. Organic food are used and consumed by human as a replacement to the natural food. 1. Organic food are produced by organic farming rather than the traditional farming method which will harm the environment. 2.…

    • 740 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As these biotech companies became more and more powerful, they just ignored the negative effects that they brought to other farming methods. For instance, there had a huge argument between the GMO and the organic farming:” pollen and seeds from GE crops can drift across fields to nearby organic plants. Contamination can cost organic growers some overseas markets; for example, have rejected organic products when tests showed they carried even trace amounts of GE materials” (Layton). The growing GE crops led to the economic loss of the organic growers, which directly affected the development of organic farming and agro economy. Obviously, it is not easy for the GMO industry to peacefully get along with organic farming.…

    • 1677 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    It is impossible to reduce amount of agriculture because they support United states food production and it is impossible to eliminated. However, environmental agency and organizations have to protect nature by restrict agriculture. Government relies on voluntary approaches, such as education and financial assistance to encourage farmers to protect water quality. Hence, authors final question is to how much government control of agriculture water pollution because it is difficult, but it can prevent agriculture…

    • 1357 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For example, soil, water, air and climate change, and ecological services are all benefits that factory farmers will never have ("Organic Agriculture"). Soil improves the formation and structure of the land and creates a more stable system. Therefore, nutrient and energy cycling is increased and the soil for nutrients and water are enhanced. Pollution of chemically enhanced fertilizers and pesticides in water is a major problem in the industrial farming system. The use of these products are prohibited in organic farming.…

    • 818 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If pesticide application decreased and or stopped altogether, and produce was organic, minus the GMO aspect, produce would be deemed one hundred percent safe to eat. People who spray the fields with pesticides are in hazards suits, yet the consumers eat the collected harvest with traces of pesticides still on their food. If the harvest is healthier, humans will have a healthier diet, creating a better standard of living. Lastly, the ability to insert genes into plants that “allow prosperity during extreme cold and excessive heat can assist in crop yield during environmental shifts” (Bentham Science Publishers 1). Currently, America is experiencing a shift in their weather patterns, causing farmer’s crops to fluctuate greatly.…

    • 1244 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Conventional farming destroys the topsoil, and infects the water around the area because of the chemicals in the pesticides they use (Organic). Organic farming does not pollute the waterways, because they do not use any pesticidal chemicals (Dauncey). Pesticides end up killing organisms along with their intended target. Many living things in, and around, pesticide ridden areas end up getting poisoned and dying. One major example…

    • 1042 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    The advantages are, BT cotton increases the amount of cotton being produced, because bollworms no longer effect it. The crystalline toxic that BT cotton produces is effective Bollworms are sensitive to it; this helps the BT cotton protect itself from the bollworms. The advantages of BT cotton can also be categorised into many categories, namely: economics, social and environment. For the economic category, due to the existence of BT cotton, it reduced or even eliminated the need for farmers to develop the land and use pesticides, because BT cotton fights the effects of the bollworm without using any pesticides. Reducing the need for farmers to develop the land is also a social category because now farmers can spend their time doing something else.…

    • 1898 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays