Rhetorical Analysis Of Why Does Monsanto Sue Farmers Who Save Seeds?

Improved Essays
Register to read the introduction… Where do these fruits and vegetables come from? Most people would answer “They are grown on a farm of course!” Which indeed is true, but thinking beyond that, most produce starts off as just a tiny seedling. So going back to the question… fruits and veggies come from seeds which are produced and distributed by agribusiness corporations like Monsanto. In their article ‘Why Does Monsanto Sue Farmers Who Save Seeds?’ Monsanto; one of the first agribusiness corporations, defends the company’s reputation and effectively justifies why and how they go about handling patent infringement. Originally posted on Monsanto’s website, the article informs readers of the great lengths that the company goes through to do research and development of their seeds, why their product is patented and also why it’s so important for Monsanto to pursue consumers who do not follow the provisions outlined in a signed agreement. Monsanto appeals to their target audience by using specific rhetorical techniques including ethos and logos to convince …show more content…
The company uses logos by giving a numerical value on how many lawsuits have been filed against seed infringement violators. In the article Monsanto states that various cases are settled before moving onto a trial, however when forced they have only filed 144 lawsuits since 1997 which averages about 11 per year in the past 13 years. This shows the reader that although Monsanto will go the extent of filing lawsuits against farmers who break the contract, the consumers are given the opportunity to handle the violations “in house” per say before having to deal with legal consequences. Monsanto is trying to convince readers of the importance of patenting seeds and abiding by these laws. With these statistics the company supports their claim with logical information and facts.
‘Why Does Monsanto Sue Farmers Who Save Seeds?’ gave the reader’s facts, background information for the company and showed why Monsanto can be trusted regarding their laws and regulations. Readers would likely agree that abiding by seed infringement laws is just as significant as following other rules after reading this article. By using rhetorical techniques Monsanto gave a compelling argument in favor of their patent laws and why they pursue the wrongdoing of those

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Summary of Monsanto’s Harvest of fear by Barlett and Steele The summer day in 2002 at the town square of Eagleville, Missouri, a tiny farm community 100 miles north of Kansas City. Gary Rinehart was behind the counter of the Square Deal, his "old-time country store," as he states. When a stranger walked in and issued his threat. As Rinehart would recall, the man began to verbally attack him, saying he had proof that Rinehart had planted Monsanto's genetically modified (G.M.) soybeans in violation of the company's patent.…

    • 311 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Monsanto’s Harvest of fear” Analysis Monopolizing on a certain product is a business practice that has been used for decades. While this practice is extremely beneficial to those who succeed in doing it, it is simultaneously harmful to every other business owner, usually smaller franchises, in the same line of work. While the one large business continues to profit, the smaller business owners usually go out of business or, if they’re lucky, loses an extremely large percentage of their sales. This is what Donald L. Barlett and James B. Steele try to illustrate through their usage of both pathos and logos in “Monsanto’s Harvest of fear”, in which they attempt to get the readers to view big businesses as agricultural bullies.…

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In the article “Monsanto’s Harvest of Fear”, by Donald Barlett and James Steele; there are claims made that state that Monsanto is the ruler of all of the United States food production. Monsanto produces genetically enhanced seeds that resist many weed killers such as their own product, Roundup. By doing this Monsanto has put a patent on these seeds, this means that farmers have to buy Monsanto’s product. But, when farmers buy the seeds they have to sign a contract agreeing to not reuse them, so that they are required to buy more. Monsanto is so strict on this policy that they have hired Gestapo like subjects called “seed police” to go check farmer’s fields.…

    • 290 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Monsanto Swot Analysis

    • 65 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Our society is facing some big challenges, like combating climate change, utilizing water and other resources more efficiently, and making a more balanced meal accessible for everyone. No one organization or company can do it alone, and Monsanto is certainly not an expert in all areas, so we partner with others like scholars and researchers at major universities to tackle some of these big…

    • 65 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Such activity was unanimously found by the United States Supreme Court to constitute patent infringement in Bowman v. Monsanto Co. (2013) . The case began in 2007, when Monsanto sued Indiana farmer Vernon Hugh Bowman who in 1999 bought seed for his second planting from a grain elevator – the same elevator that he and others sold their transgenic crops . The elevator sold the soybeans as commodities, not as seeds for planting . Bowman tested the new seeds, and found that as he had expected, some were resistant to glyphosate. He intentionally replanted his harvest of Genetically Modified seeds in subsequent years, supplementing them with more soybeans he bought at the elevator .…

    • 1478 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Monsanto, a multinational agrochemical corporation, has claimed that Glaser Farms has infringed on their seed patent. Glaser Farms asserts that their farm was contaminated by a nearby Monsanto subsidiary through cross-pollination and Mr. Glaser, the owner of the farm, has spoken with the media several times about this incident. He has claimed that Monsanto’s allegations are false and that they would never want to do business with an unethical corporation such as Monsanto. Our company would rather wait until a court verdict is given before drawing any conclusions about the…

    • 762 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Holocaust Vs Monsanto

    • 1721 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Genetically Modified Holocaust Everyone in the world needs three basic requirements to live-- air, water, and food. Out of the three needs in life, one if more appreciated and outshines the rest.. Food. Food has tv shows and its own network, not to mention there are tons of social media accounts focused entirely on food. Food connects countries and continents, and leave options to explore different cultures through food.…

    • 1721 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Monsanto's Seed Police

    • 355 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Question five asks what I think of Monsanto’s “seed police” and if the seeds should be protected. The question goes on to ask if the seeds should be affordable to even the poorest farmers. I will answer these questions from three different perspectives. The three perspectives are as a business professional, as a stakeholder, and as a member of the community at large. As a business professional, I think companies have a general right to their intellectual property.…

    • 355 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Over the years Monsanto has gain control of the food business industry by manipulating farmers. Monsanto sells Roundup Ready seeds and farmers can actually purchase these seeds but to do so farmers must sign a contact with Mosanto stating that farmers cannot save seeds to produce after each year for re-planting, or sell the seeds to other farmers. If farmers do not follow the rules of the contract then they will have a breach of contact and Monsanto will file a lawsuit againt any farmer that violates the contract and they will take anything away from the farmer such as its property. Every farmer does not buy genetically modified seeds from Monsanto but there are many cases where the G.M. seeds do land in another farmer's property because of…

    • 202 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The more than 45 lawsuits consolidated as part of multidistrict litigation in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California come as the state won its own suit against Monsanto to list glyphosate as a human carcinogen and force it to place a warning label on the product. The unsealed court documents caught the attention of European Parliament. Its environmental and agriculture committees organized a public hearing Oct. 11 titled, “The Monsanto papers and glyphosate.” Monsanto refused to attend the hearing after…

    • 392 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Rhetorical Analysis of GMO Articles In the report by the National Academy of Sciences (NAS), “Genetically Engineered Crops: Report and Prospects,” Gould et al. provide logical appeals such as: scientific research, statistics, and other facts supporting the use of GMOs. In the article, Gould et al. disprove many common GMO misconceptions.…

    • 1549 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    If an official for the government that had previously worked for Monsanto might just give them that right. Examples of government officials giving them the advantage would be, they would know how many more opportunities they would be able to gain.…

    • 123 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Fast Food Analysis

    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Monsanto has a group of people to investigate and prosecute farmers if farmers save some seeds. I think this company and the U.S. government have centralized power to against farmers who really produce…

    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Seeds Of Death Analysis

    • 1632 Words
    • 7 Pages

    1. The title of the film is Seeds of Death and it was released in 2012. The documentary’s purpose is to educate the public on what truly is in the food they eat. Furthermore, it attempts to show the impacts of this and call for a change. The film expounds on the evils of genetically modified organisms or GMO’s.…

    • 1632 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    As Monsanto is a multinational company whose products are consumed by the food industry, it should strictly emphasize on its moral obligations concerning the society where their products are being sold. Such moral obligation includes providing best quality of seeds to the consumers and betterment of farmer’s life. For this purpose, Monsanto ensures high yielding properties of their seeds and it would prevent against insects eating their precious crops. This would ease the farmers in keeping their crops safe and reduce their hassle to sprinkle pesticides for crop safety. On the contrary these genetically modified seeds reported in causing health related issues on consuming the food grown from them.…

    • 1014 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays