Missouri Compromise In The 1800s

Improved Essays
The Missouri Compromise The 1800s were a dark time in our nation where disagreements over political power, and the conflict between free and slaves states occurred. There were several disputes and battles over land and the morality of slavery. Although a dark time in the United States, this was also a push for a better future. New ideas and policies circulated around this time period in an effort to seek compromise between the states and eventually end slavery. This appeared to be a great idea to certain citizens of the North but the South disagreed, and was not going to go down without a fight. The nation at that time was disordered. The disagreements lead up to several settlements such as the Missouri Compromise, but this temporary solution …show more content…
These disagreements over power and the balance of free and slave states would lead to the formation of the Missouri Compromise. The compromise was formed in 1820, as an act to resolve the conflict that was going on in the country. At this time, James Monroe was president and noticed he needed to find way to settle the disagreements between the North and the South. Monroe had a mutual view on slavery he was neither for nor against it. In the end, he viewed slavery as an issue but he believed that the states had the right to make their own governmental decisions. Instead of intervening with the states he allowed the congress to make decisions about slavery in the new territories of the United States ("Missouri …show more content…
The Compromise was passed and endorsed on March 6, 1820 by President James Monroe ("Page 1 of James Madison to James Monroe, February 23, 1820."). The Missouri Compromise was thought to be a solution that would reduce tension between the states over the issue of land and slavery. When Missouri requested statehood they wanted to become a slave state. This request for slavery caused a debate among the congressmen of the North and the South. In all, the request was granted on the condition that slavery would be prohibited on the agreed Missouri dividing line. Before the official settlement there were many disputes between congressmen. The northerners and southerners were not closely involved in the issue of Missouri’s pro-slavery statehood until it’s controversy grew and started affecting the citizens of those

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Missouri Compromise Dbq

    • 177 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Prior to the time of the Missouri compromise, there were an equal number of slave states to free states thus there was an equal balance of power in congress. Once Missouri had applied for admission into the union there was instant disapproval from the northern territories for they had thought that the south already had a substantial amount of power. The Missouri compromise was a way to balance congress of free and slave states. The compromise itself was passed in 1820 giving Missouri the title of a slave state and Maine the title of a free state. Therefore it settled a rising dispute between the slave and free territories.…

    • 177 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Slavery was an issue in slave states from South and Free states North in 1800s. South states were the agricultural area so they needed slaves and support it, but not the North state. Several disputes exists, Congress performed compromises to settle these disputes. But these compromises could not hold for longer. (1820 - 1861: HOLDING THE UNION TOGETHER)…

    • 212 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Many political issues had detrimental effects that caused the Civil War. One of those issues being the Missouri Compromise, which took place in 1820. The reasoning behind the Missouri compromise was due to the South feeling that since the North had gained Maine, as a free state, that the political power would be much stronger than it would be in the South. Therefore, Missouri was to become a slave state, which then also created the cutoff line for free and slave states. The Missouri compromise was not a problem that was solved quickly, the entire process took about two years to solve.…

    • 186 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Missouri Compromise divided the nation into two separate parts, free or slave states. Popular sovereignty allowed the states to choose whether or not they would be free. As read in the text, “What then we do insist on, is, not to extend slavery, but that we shall not be prohibited from immigrating with our property, into the Territories of the United States” (Document 8). The South wanted to bring slavery with them and believed they had the right to do so. Although, in the North it was decided that slavery would be abolished and they would all be free states.…

    • 577 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Missouri was well known for its slavery in the 1800s. If the Missouri Compromise didn’t happen, it was of changed the United States today greatly. The Missouri Compromise accomplished making Missouri a slave state and changing Maine into a free state because it wanted to be separated from Massachusetts. There were 22 states at the time equally divided into 11 slave states and 11 free slave states. There was chaos when the Missouri compromise was made, so they made Maine a free of slave state to even out the states.…

    • 205 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    the Union from the Northwest Territory. Missouri, which was obtained through the Louisiana Purchase, requested for admission as a slave state only contributed to the fears that slavery was expanding northward. Representative of New York, James Tallmadge, Jr., proposed two amendments to the Missouri statehood bill in 1819. First, it proposed the prohibition of any further slaves into Missouri. Secondly, he proposed the gradual emancipation for slaves currently there.…

    • 155 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Luckily, the Civil War was delayed due to various settlements between political parties regarding slavery- such as the Missouri Compromise, Compromise of 1850, and the Kansas-Nebraska Act. The Missouri Compromise of 1820 was proposed by Representative Henry Clay from Kentucky. Clay came up with this after Missouri demanded to become a state, which would have upset the existing balance among free and slave states. The compromise resulted in Missouri admitted as a slave state and Maine carved out of Massachusetts as a free state.…

    • 508 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    One major controversy of the 1850s was the Kansas-Nebraska Act which was around 1854, A man by the name of Stephan Douglas made a proposal that Kansas and Nebraska be divided into two sections while the Missouri compromise be repealed, settlers had to decipher on whether or not to they wanted slavery in their territories which was popular sovereignty. In relation to the expansion of slavery, this contributed to the divide of America on the how the Union looked at slavery and the Confederacy. Many states had their own stances on slavery as they were either pro-slavery or anti-slavery. Kansas with slavery would violate the Missouri compromise, which for the most part kept the Union intact over the last few decades. As a result of this Kansas-Nebraska…

    • 207 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Civil War Dbq

    • 1115 Words
    • 5 Pages

    It received backlash from both the south and the north, “The Missouri Compromise…

    • 1115 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Senator Stephen Douglas of Illinois was the man who decided to put this act into effect. At the time, the Missouri Compromise was in effect that stated that no slave territories be added into the Union above the 36o30’ line, which Kansas and Nebraska both were above, but anything below that line may be added in as a slave stateZ. Senator Stephen Douglas, a Democrat, stated in the act that the people of the territory were allowed to vote on the subject of slavery in their territory. Douglas, who was a pro slavery senator as most Democrats were, was all in favor of this act that completely disregards the terms and conditions of the Missouri Compromise. On the other hand, many of the Northern abolitionists at the time disagreed completely with the idea because of the fact it would allow slavery into territories it should not. This is a strong instance in which the country was divided into north and south based on the argument of slavery in new territories.…

    • 1871 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Missouri Compromise of 1820 brought Missouri into America as a slave state and Maine as a free state. Everything above the Louisiana Purchase Boundary line, with the exception of Missouri, banned slavery. This action resulted in maintaining an equal representation for both the North and the South in the Senate. Following this, the Compromise of 1850 allowed California to be admitted as a free state, however popular sovereignty would be used in the land of the Mexican Cession. This caused controversy within the states.…

    • 1394 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Sectionalism Dbq

    • 1181 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Early in the eighteen hundreds, the Missouri Compromise was written to declare which states were to be known as slave states and free states. A line was drawn across the United States at latitude 36°30′ stating that each state to the north of the line and east of the Mississippi River is a free state and each state south of the line and east of the…

    • 1181 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Missouri compromise was passed in 1820, which regulated slavery in the western states that were gained through the Louisiana purchase. This compromise contributed to the division between the north and south regarding the issue of slavery. Slavery was not allowed in anywhere north of the 36:30 parallel, but the state of Missouri allowed slavery. Fortunately, the compromise made many Americans happy and without the compromise the inevitable civil war would have occurred sooner. But unfortunately, the happiness of the country was ruined when the Missouri compromise got repealed.…

    • 1102 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In 1820, Congress passed the Missouri Compromise. This compromise agreed to admit Missouri as a slave state and then admit Maine as a free state to keep the balance of free and slave states in the country. It also created the 36’ 30° line. The 36’ 30° line was an imaginary line on the southern border of Missouri above which it was agreed new states could not hold slaves. Many in the south saw this as an act in support of the abolition of slavery, which helped to increase tensions between the north and south over the issue of slavery (Missouri n.d.).…

    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The people of the United States believed it was their god given right to expand from the Atlantic Ocean, east to the Pacific Ocean, North to Canadian border, and South to Mexico. This idea of Manifest Destiny fueled the expansion into the West. Big indicators of Manifest Destiny were the use of the Oregon Trail, and the Mexican – American War. Despite Manifest Destiny bringing about an increase in sectionalism and conflict, it also allowed for the expansion of territory and fueled movement into the west. With people moving west into the newly claimed territory, there was controversy whether the territories would become free or slave states.…

    • 788 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays