The Kansas-Nebraska Controversy

Decent Essays
One major controversy of the 1850s was the Kansas-Nebraska Act which was around 1854, A man by the name of Stephan Douglas made a proposal that Kansas and Nebraska be divided into two sections while the Missouri compromise be repealed, settlers had to decipher on whether or not to they wanted slavery in their territories which was popular sovereignty. In relation to the expansion of slavery, this contributed to the divide of America on the how the Union looked at slavery and the Confederacy. Many states had their own stances on slavery as they were either pro-slavery or anti-slavery. Kansas with slavery would violate the Missouri compromise, which for the most part kept the Union intact over the last few decades. As a result of this Kansas-Nebraska

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    However, popular sovereignty became extremely controversial in 1854 when Kansas and Nebraska, two extremely profitable states in the cotton industry, adopted the policy. The widespread approval of popular sovereignty also resulted in a dramatic rise in the acceptability of the northern abolitionist movement. Despite the temporary reprieve provided by the compromises, the tremendous economic opportunities of western expansion…

    • 1210 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In an era where slavery was viewed as a profitable and reputable source of wealth, income, power, and an economic driving force, divisions amongst opinions added fuel to the flame for an unavoidable conflict to ignite. The Missouri Compromise came about for views, even within a time with which like-mindedness was prized and raised to the highest of glories on a pedestal, vastly varied on the issue of slavery and its seemingly rather loosely tied boundaries. With two opposing sides, the North for the removal of slavery and the South in favor of its continued existence -- territorial issues were heavy on the mind. Though often revered as being a more verbal form of compromise that laid out specific boundaries within the states, or two states…

    • 474 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Territorial Issues and Compromises On April 12, 1861 the legendary American Civil War broke out. This was a war that would decide the fate of the United States of America. A major problem within the government back then was deciding on whether or not the government had power to outlaw slavery in unmarked U.S. territories. As more territory was acquired, the greater the tension grew between the free and slave states.…

    • 508 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The major impact of the Kansas-Nebraska Act was that it brought the US closer to a civil war and ended the Missouri compromise. The effect of the Missouri Compromise was to keep the political balance between both slave states and free states by putting them into the union in pairs. It also brought the U.S. closer because it brought the question of slavery back up in states and areas where the issue and place of slavery had already been decided before. Kansas and Nebraska were supposed to be territories that are free from slavery. Meaning that slavery was not allowed in these places.…

    • 179 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The Kansas-Nebraska Act

    • 126 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Two years later, in 1854, President Franklin Pierce signed the Kansas-Nebraska Act into law. The Kansas-Nebraska Act mandated popular sovereignty, which allowed settlers of a territory to decide whether slavery would be allowed within a new state’s borders. This bill overturned the Missouri Compromise’s use of latitude as the boundary between slave and free territory. Conflicts arose which led to a period of violence, known as Bleeding Kansas. One event after another occurred, such as the Dred Scott Decision and John Brown taking armory at Harpers Ferry.…

    • 126 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Slavery was a very big topic of debate in the United States during the 1800s. What typically happened was, the northern population was anti-slavery, and the southern population was pro-slavery. With the expansion of the United States' borders, came the expansion of slavery. Many groups of people were widely opposed to this expansion of slavery, and in events like the Kansas-Nebraska Act, and the Mexican-American War, many arguments arose regarding the moral and political effect of this expansion.…

    • 445 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For example, Illinois Senator Stephen Douglas attempted to pass both the Kansas-Nebraska Act, as well as the Compromise of 1850. He sought to repeal the ban of slavery north of the 36 degree 30” line previously established in the Missouri Compromise and to admit California as a slave state. In so doing, he sparked political controversy creating a divide between between anti-slavery (typically Northern) and pro-slavery (typically southern) politicians. These pro-slavery laws ignited widespread anger throughout the North, creating fissures within political parties which would eventually lead to divisions within them. Additionally, the numerous Acts passed in an effort to appease each side of the slavery controversy, also undermined the Country’s overall domestic tranquility.…

    • 1279 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Civil War Dbq

    • 645 Words
    • 3 Pages

    However, in 1854 the Kansas-Nebraska Act was signed, Stephen Douglas offered popular sovereignty, making people decide whether to have their territory slave free or not. This act terminated the Missouri Compromise. In addition, to this in…

    • 645 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Senator Stephen Douglas of Illinois was the man who decided to put this act into effect. At the time, the Missouri Compromise was in effect that stated that no slave territories be added into the Union above the 36o30’ line, which Kansas and Nebraska both were above, but anything below that line may be added in as a slave stateZ. Senator Stephen Douglas, a Democrat, stated in the act that the people of the territory were allowed to vote on the subject of slavery in their territory. Douglas, who was a pro slavery senator as most Democrats were, was all in favor of this act that completely disregards the terms and conditions of the Missouri Compromise. On the other hand, many of the Northern abolitionists at the time disagreed completely with the idea because of the fact it would allow slavery into territories it should not. This is a strong instance in which the country was divided into north and south based on the argument of slavery in new territories.…

    • 1871 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Civil War Dbq

    • 813 Words
    • 4 Pages

    For the majority of American History leading up to the Civil War, civilians had been divided over the issue of slavery and politics. The nation had a long history of compromise that seemed necessary to keep the nation unified. Most of these compromises avoided the issue of slavery, as politicians and “great compromisers” like Henry Clay aimed to prevent the inevitable split between the North and South. There was a turning point, however, in the North and South, when compromise was no longer an option. Although the election of Abraham Lincoln in 1860 was the immediate and final trigger for southern secession, other attributes including the Kansas-Nebraska Act, Bleeding Kansas, and the Dred Scott decision of 1857 drove the South further towards…

    • 813 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Kansas-Nebraska Act has been called the most significant law ever enacted by the Congress of the United States. It was called the most significant law ever enacted because it allowed people in the territories of Kansas and Nebraska to decide for themselves whether or not to allow slavery within their borders. The law had three major features, which were a larger territory of Nebraska was dissected into two smaller territories, Kanas and Nebraska, the dissolution of the Missouri compromise, and the new territories would determine its slavery status based on popular sovereignty. When the new law went into effect pro-slavery and anti-slavery settlers rushed to Kansas, each side hoping to determine the results of the first election. Instead…

    • 1083 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Compromise Of 1850 Essay

    • 1860 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Two years later, the Kansas-Nebraska Act was passed by President Fillmore. This act was much more isolating, splitting the Democratic Party according to sectional interests and increasing the Republican Party. Other than that, it was basically the same as the Compromise of 1850. The struggle between the North and South fighting over Kansas led to people soon flooding into Kansas to fight about slavery, which leads to the “Crime against Kansas”, also known as one of the most famous political historical events. (Senator Charles Sumner talks smack about Preston Brooks relative, and Brooks beats him with a…

    • 1860 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Sectionalism In 1820-1850

    • 833 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In the years between 1820 and 1850, the controversy of sectionalism and slavery was very much alive. The South wanted to use slaves as a way to keep their fragile economy stable, but the moral contradictions of owning other people was too much for many in the North. And with the growing popularity of expanding the country westward, a new issue was created regarding how new territories would decide their slavery status. Westward expansion impacted the development of sectionalism from 1820-1850 in the United States politically due to Manifest Destiny, a harmful ideology that drove white Americans into the West in the first place, the Missouri Compromise, an amendment prohibiting the use slaves above the Louisiana Territory line, and the Wilmot Proviso, which further tried to prohibit slavery in the territories acquired from Mexico.…

    • 833 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Not long afterwards, the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854 took place. This repealed the Missouri Compromise. Kansas and Nebraska were both to vote using popular sovereignty to decide on slavery. Both pro-slavery settlers and anti-slavery settlers rushed to the area to gain the upper hand of the states, resulting in absolute chaos. As a result states’ rights and Manifest Destiny played a role in the cause of the Civil War.…

    • 1394 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Passed by Congress in may of 1854, the Kansas Nebraska Act may be the most significant of the Pre-Civil War compromises. It admitted the Kansas and Nebraska as states, but rather than decide whether the territories would become slave or non-slave states based on their location in relation to the 36’ 30° line, they were allowed to choose for themselves. Kansas and Nebraska were not the only ones allowed to decide though, each territory was allowed to choose for itself if it would be a slave or non-slave state. This allowing of territories to choose slave or non-slave is called popular sovereignty. In popular sovereignty the people of the territory vote to decide if they will become a slave state or a non-slave state.…

    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays