Mississippi Black Code Research Paper

Improved Essays
The Enslavement of a Free People
The Mississippi Black Code was a response to Reconstruction by white Southern Democrats, which aimed to return African Americans to a slave-like state, in order to restore a sense of masculinity and power to white landowners who had lost status and capital. The code symbolized and legalized the racist ideas that drove Southerners to exclude African Americans from politics and society.
The Mississippi Black Code argues that African Americans, despite the Thirteenth Amendment, weren’t equals of white men. This code, written by rich white Democrats, created a separate set of laws for African Americans which attempted to “[revive] slavery in disguise” without directly violating the Thirteenth Amendment, through
…show more content…
While some may claim that it was a defense of states’ rights, it was a hypocritical defense of states’ rights to crush a group’s individual rights, some of which, like the Second Amendment, had existed long before the Civil War. The code relied on deceptive language to disguise this violation of rights. Apprenticeship, for instance, painted white persons as saviors, helping needy African American children, while in reality it reasserted white supremacy. The code, because it was written by white Democrats with political power, fails to account for the opinions of African Americans, and of the Southern whites who supported emancipation. It ignores the struggles of African Americans to overcome socio-political hurdles by obtaining an education in schools and colleges run by African Americans, by establishing communities and community leaders in churches, and even by aligning with Populists and other Democrats to influence politics, even if these parties didn’t always align with black interests. In order to have better represented the historical period, the code would have benefitted from allowing African Americans to have political power and hence influence this code, which may at first seem antithetical to the code’s purpose, but black leaders like Booker T. Washington advocated for a separation of the races, and accepted literacy tests and other voting requirements. Including these black voices would add validity to the code, because it would divert the racism behind it, while creating the same exclusionary and discriminatory policies.
In conclusion, the Mississippi Black Code, even though some of its ideas aligned with black leaders like Washington, was racist in its segregation, and violently denied African Americans civil rights to regain a sense of superiority. It was a desperate attempt to stay in an antebellum past, and a rejection of the Second

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    He constantly challenged the legality of the laws and wanted blacks to work together to fight the laws. His weakness was his approach to improve African American life failed in the Plessy v. Ferguson case because Plessy challenged that he was 7/8 white and the state still ruled that he was African American. The state argued that his features were distinct too express that he was African American. Washington’s argument is more directed towards the attitude of resulting back to slavery with…

    • 1026 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The period of reincorporating Southern states into the Union is known as Reconstruction, as it followed the defeat of Confederate soldiers in the Civil War. Officially it began in 1863 and lasted until 1877. The main aim was to reunite a nation with divided convictions and improve the position of African Americans, post abolition of slavery, economically and socially. It can be argued that Reconstruction failed as the legislation passed was ambiguous and was manipulated to continue disenfranchising African Americans and was hypocritical of its aims. Such as the Black Codes, that promoted legal, political, economic and social unequal treatment of African Americans.…

    • 1333 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Some felt strongly against these laws and spoke out against what they saw. Charles W. Chesnutt was a black man who could have easily passed as white. His essay entitled, “What is a White Man” criticized these discriminatory attitudes and ideals that supported them. He condemned the views of southern writers who tried to euphemize saying the white race must continue to “exercise exclusive control and direction of the government” and that blacks should have no voice in directing the government. Chesnutt highlights different state laws that constitute what it means to be black, and which privileges black people are restricted from.…

    • 1954 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    This pushed forward the abolition of slavery and new regulations. Among those were the conservative “Sumner’s bill” that allowed for a new department to establish regulations for the freedman, promising protection, land, wages, and judiciary justice. This bill was ultimately defeated but a “Bureau of Refugees, Freedmen, and Abandoned Lands” was created (DuBois, 10). This demonstrates the government’s want to be involved in African American lives and ruling over them. Though they may appear to be for good suit, their main enactment did not help the African American community and further benefited the white tyranny.…

    • 1351 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This is extremely powerful towards the social position of blacks at the time. They were not considered people, so for the President of to let a black into the White House this shows that slavery is morally and ethically wrong, it also shows that a change will come because someone is now looking out for the black population. Lincoln’s ambition for the black population was colonization. He was going to give them the state of New Hampshire. Giving them New Hampshire would have been ideal because that way they could start their own society without color prejudice.…

    • 1209 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Reconstruction Equality

    • 1179 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Southern whites’ goal was to ensure the blacks did not achieve equality. Legislation can change laws but it cannot change feelings. Reconstruction was an attempt at a social revolution that failed. Former slaves’ major goal was to achieve equality with whites. Southern whites goal was to ensure the blacks did not achieve equality.…

    • 1179 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    West focuses on the reasons for creating governmental programs through the eyes of the black community while Steele’s chooses to explain the reasons of creating these programs through the white liberal perspective. Steel’s ideological theories as to why these entitlement programs were initially created, only includes the presence of white guilt, failing to include the elevation rooting from the Civil Rights movements and the Black power ideology. Although they have separate approaches, they both come to a meeting point within their theories on affirmative action. Both philosophers attain the idea that affirmative action is simply a program which takes away from black success corrupting their psychological mindset, and hindering the black community from reaching their full potential by them heavily depending on…

    • 738 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The racist government officials who still had state power over the southern states after the Civil War, did not want to allow blacks to live normal lives as whites did, and did so by enforcing these laws. The Northern states, however, went as far as to ban Jim Crow laws in states such as Indiana, Illinois, Ohio, and Pennsylvania. Blacks were freed from slavery, given citizenship, and the right to vote. Something was missing, however. They were given these legal rights that allowed them to be free, yet the whites always seemed to have the better privileges.…

    • 1350 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This was because it did not accomplish the goals of Reconstruction because one of the two main goals of Reconstruction was to gain civil rights for freed slaves. Consequently, this proves Reconstruction to be unsuccessful because of attempts at taking away the rights of African Americans, which undermined this larger goal. Through state governments, laws were made which took away the rights that they were trying to be gained by African Americans such as voting, having the ability to choose who they work for, and not being enslaved. The purpose of southern state governments taking away those rights from African Americans was to recreate slavery and recreate a system of white hierarchy which technically had been outlawed. This was all as a result of the state governments having too much power because despite the accomplishments of the 13th, 14th, and 15th amendments, the state governments found ways to take away these rights that were granted in the amendments.…

    • 895 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Slavery Vs Slavery

    • 1543 Words
    • 7 Pages

    However, after the Emancipation of blacks, the white people felt the need to prove supremacy over the other race. During the Reconstruction period of the Civil War, “black hopes and white fears collided.” (p23) Since blacks were looked at as property, before and during the Civil War, depending on who your master was you may have been protected from some dangers if you stated in line. After Emancipation, they were no longer property, so some of that protection they African Americans would have were gone and they were on their own. The overpowered feelings of whites towards African Americans came out and resulted in the lynching, torture, and unjust treatment. Lynching African American especially in the South, increased…

    • 1543 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays