Mill's Utilitarianism

Improved Essays
Mill’s utilitarianism theory is based on the consequences of actions. The principle of that theory is that an end most be happiness. To achieve that end, in Mill’s view, right actions must be done constructing the best possible outcome; or in other words, right actions lead to incite the greatest happiness. But, what is happiness? Mill’s defines happiness as pleasure and the absence of pain. Vice versa, unhappiness is pain or unpleased; this reverse of happiness is acquired by doing wrong actions.
Furthermore, Mill’s argues that pleasure has quality and quantity; depending on people’s goals and ends the two variables can differ. Meaning, some pleasures are better than others. For example, an action can have good consequences nonetheless still

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    In John Stuart Mill’s influential book “Utilitarianism”, Mill introduces the belief that moral action is based upon the concept of utility, or how he explains it, the greatest happiness principle. It is this greatest happiness principle that defines Utilitarianism as the notion that the best moral actions are those that promote the most amount of human happiness. Actions that would be regarded as the least favorable are those that promote the opposite, unhappiness. The concept of Utilitarianism and that of Consequentialism are similar as both judge the moral value of an action dependent on its consequences, however each claim leads to different conclusions.…

    • 1497 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Mill’s theory not only examines ones individual happiness but also forces one to examine the “association between his own happiness and the good of the whole” (Mills, 17). For example, a bystander by a train discovers that the train track has broken and if the train shall continue it will kill the 200 people aboard the train if it maintains motion and consequently crashes. The bystander has a choice to either let the train continue and kill the 200 passengers, or he can choose to throw the man next to him, a complete stranger, on to the tracks and that person, but him alone, will die instead and the train will not crash. Ethical Hedonism is additionally a vital concept to Mill’s theory of morality. Ethical Hedonism describes happiness, as the greatest happiness of the greatest number is the measure of right and wrong.…

    • 2232 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    This proposes that the only one’s who can determine the significance of a certain pleasure must be one who has experienced both the high and low pleasures of life. The issue with this is that Mill seems to believe that those who prefer the more physical, lower quality pleasures…

    • 1510 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Introduction: John Stuart Mill, although accepts the Radicals legacy in the utilitarian domain, he adds to and supplements their points of views, especially in the areas of human motivation and the true nature of happiness. When we read through Mill’s approach on happiness, we see how a lot of Radicals’ assumptions are modified, this can be seen in the second chapter of his essay: Utilitarianism. The Proportionality Doctrine is one of the most prominent concepts that emerge from his writing which suggests that actions are “right” when doing them leads to the highest amount of happiness as a lack of pain, and the reverse of this constitutes a “wrong” action. Here, happiness means pleasure which comes with the absence of pain, and unhappiness…

    • 1387 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Happiness is desired by many as an end result, but Mill does not explain it with a clear and cogent…

    • 714 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Mill then tells of the condition of happiness: happiness is not a continuous state of pleasure, but rather “the occasional brilliant flash if enjoyment” (12) because if happiness is a continuous state, it would most definitely be unattainable. He later addresses that humans can do without happiness, but it is unnecessary unless doing so is an action of self-sacrifice that is intended towards promoting happiness. This shows that happiness is inherent and…

    • 1076 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Happiness is pleasure and the absence of pain versus unhappiness which is pain and the absences of pleasure. Mill thinks pleasures and happiness are the same. If something brings you pleasure, then you are happy. Just as if you are happy something has brought you pleasure. Take for example food, it is only desired to stop and/or prevent hunger which brings happiness to the person starving.…

    • 1146 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Through Mill’s view on Utilitarianism there emerges a core moral theory called the greatest happiness principle. However, I believe that Mill’s Greatest Happiness Principle is false. I believe this because after examining his theory I noticed several flaws within his theory. Before I say what is wrong with Mill’s argument and theory I want to address the definition of the greatest happiness principle and what all it encompasses. Mill believes that “actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness, [and] wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness” (Mill,97).…

    • 1145 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Today we routinely differentiate between hedonism as a theory of the good and utilitarianism as a consequentialist theory of the right. Mill, however, considered both doctrines to be so closely intertwined that he used the term ‘utilitarianism’ to signify both theories. On the one hand, he says that the “utilitarian doctrine is, that happiness is desirable, and the only thing desirable, as an end.” (CW 10, 234) On the other hand, he defines utilitarianism as a moral theory according to which “actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness…”…

    • 809 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hello everyone! This is a utilitarian argument because the argument towards Ashley’s treatment was based on trying to prevent the most amount of discomfort (pain), and maximizing her lifetime happiness and comfort (pleasure). This is the hedonistic way of the utilitarian belief. They employed questions from the hedonistic calculus.…

    • 526 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mill agrees that sensual pleasures are easier to satisfy, and those pursuing higher quality pleasure might encounter challenges and frustration in their quest. Nevertheless, he assures that it is more gratifying to be "Socrates dissatisfied than a fool satisfied." Unlike Bentham, who believes that happiness or satisfaction hold a homogenous value, and should be viewed in the quantitative context, Mill states that pain and pleasure are often intertwined, and it is up to the person experiencing these feelings to judge its intensity and…

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mill aims to show that happiness is the only thing that humans ever desire. He acknowledges, though, that humans desire virtue just as authentically as we desire happiness, although less frequently than we desire happiness. This appears to reveal a problem with the kind of utilitarianism that Mill is presenting. If humans desire virtue and if virtue is something other than happiness, then happiness is not the sole object of human desire.…

    • 299 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Utilitarianism is choosing the action that promotes the most happiness. This ethical theory is not the same as egoism because instead of thinking about your own happiness, you’d be thinking about the happiness of all. However, many people argue that utilitarianism is too demanding because it requires you to consider everyone’s happiness and do what brings the most happiness to the majority. For example, imagine that you work everyday, live alone and have no family or friends. If you were to give up your paycheck, you would be able to feed a whole family of 5 even if that means you would go hungry.…

    • 340 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    There are also many conflicting situations that people face since their judgments of pleasure are different. This disprove Mill’s argument that pleasure’s quality is one of the main part of moral actions. His logic of high quality pleasure is hard to prove since everyone’s happiness is different. A result might have different meanings to varied people, so it is hard to find the sum of happiness. Morality is balanced to people’s true happiness, but not based on the sum of…

    • 1239 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Instead of Bentham’s quantitative measurement, Mill emphasized the quality of happiness over the quantity. "It is better to be a human being dissatisfied than a pig satisfied; better to be Socrates dissatisfied than a fool satisfied. And if the…

    • 728 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays