Mill's Utilitarian Arguments

Improved Essays
Hello everyone!
This is a utilitarian argument because the argument towards Ashley’s treatment was based on trying to prevent the most amount of discomfort (pain), and maximizing her lifetime happiness and comfort (pleasure). This is the hedonistic way of the utilitarian belief. They employed questions from the hedonistic calculus. For example, how bad the levels of discomfort will get (intensity), how long Ashley would have to live with such discomfort (duration), how it would affect the family (extent) are issues that the hedonistic calculus addresses.
I do believe Bentham would agree with this. Bentham described the philosophy of “By utility is meant that property in any object, whereby it tends to produce benefit, advantage, pleasure, good, or happiness” (Rosenstand, pg. 264). The “Ashley Treatment” was created to increase the benefit and happiness so Ashley can live her life more comfortably. Thus, this was a procedure that would appeal to his sensibilities. He also states in his tenth principle that if there is a course of action that that can be done that would
…show more content…
Mill discusses how dignity separates us from animals, and that all humans have some form of dignity (Rosenstand, pg. 266). This statement could mean that Mill would support the argument that Ashley’s treatment is a violation of her dignity, and would disapprove. However, he also talks about how those who have low expectations for happiness will have a greater chance of being fulfilled (Rosenstand, pg 266). Thus, Mill may believe that Ashley would be better having the few sure efforts towards her happiness was fulfilled. As Mill speaks about the great pleasures and displeasures of life, he speaks about the general causes of human suffering. Mill believes that all misfortunes that human beings suffer from can be fixed by people putting in the effort and the care to solve them (Rosenstand, pg.

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    In John Stuart Mill’s influential book “Utilitarianism”, Mill introduces the belief that moral action is based upon the concept of utility, or how he explains it, the greatest happiness principle. It is this greatest happiness principle that defines Utilitarianism as the notion that the best moral actions are those that promote the most amount of human happiness. Actions that would be regarded as the least favorable are those that promote the opposite, unhappiness. The concept of Utilitarianism and that of Consequentialism are similar as both judge the moral value of an action dependent on its consequences, however each claim leads to different conclusions.…

    • 1497 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Though knowledge of ethical theory is not mandatory in dealing with moral dilemmas in healthcare, theories on moral reasoning can assist in making a decision as to what course of action to take (Seedhouse, 2009). In this segment of the assignment, I will relate the use of sound reasoning in applying the ethical theories of utilitarianism and deontology to one such ethical dilemma. The case is that of John who just underwent cancer surgery and is now waiting for the results of a further biopsy. Pam, his wife, proposes that the results of the biopsy be deliberately withheld from John if the result is positive for metastases.…

    • 107 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    (Intro) Peter Singer’s “Famine, Affluence, and Morality” and Garrett Hardin’s “Lifeboat ethics” are contradictory philosophical works that examine whether scarce resources should be shared with the poor. Singer’s argument is that “suffering and death from lack of food, shelter and medical care are bad" (Singer, 1972); therefore all people become morally obligated to help the poor. While Hardin argues that ethics of a Lifeboat should be followed because there is a finite amount of resources available at our disposal (Hardin, 1974, pp.566). Both authors take extreme positions by providing opposing arguments on whether we should be involved in helping the famine or not. This essay will analyze the rational of both authors’ while trying…

    • 1468 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    My Money My Problem Introduction Poverty, according to United Nations, is a state where a person cannot afford to meet the basic needs. Most people live in dire poverty due to unwarranted circumstances, which have been studied by scholars to include misappropriation of government resources and poor authority. There are solutions across the field to mitigate the adverse effect of poverty in the world. One of the scholars to put forward an argument is peter singer.…

    • 1039 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What is Utilitarianism? Utilitarianism is a philosophical concept that holds an action to be held right if it tends to promote happiness for the greatest number of people. Utilitarian’s define the morally right actions as those actions that maximize happiness and minimize misery. Many believe that utilitarianism is an unrealistic theory. Arguments and responses to utilitarianism being too demanding have been made John Stuart Mill and Peter Singer.…

    • 783 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Argument of Utilitarianism In “Utilitarianism” John Stuart Mill presents the case of Utilitarianism as a moral theory. Moral theories are structured as a set of statements used to predict a set of factors or concept. Moral theories are thought to be universal and tell which action is the right one in any given situation. Utilitarianism is one the most influential and best known moral theories, often called “The Greatest Happiness Principles”.…

    • 1146 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Peter Singer ultimately believes that we are morally obligated to help those who need help and are suffering. He provides various arguments that support his belief that everyone should help the dying people of East Bengal. He starts off by assuming one thing, “suffering and death from lack of food, shelter, and medical care are bad.” This assumption serves as a foundation for his many claims since it provides a definition for what he considers bad. Furthermore, his first claim is that we are morally obligated to stop bad things from happening only if we do not have to sacrifice something of equal value.…

    • 2138 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Through Mill’s view on Utilitarianism there emerges a core moral theory called the greatest happiness principle. However, I believe that Mill’s Greatest Happiness Principle is false. I believe this because after examining his theory I noticed several flaws within his theory. Before I say what is wrong with Mill’s argument and theory I want to address the definition of the greatest happiness principle and what all it encompasses. Mill believes that “actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness, [and] wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness” (Mill,97).…

    • 1145 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Bentham and Mill, although both firm believers in Utilitarianism, had somewhat different views when it came to decision making. Bentham uses a step by step process in his essay describing the thought process that one should have when determining the outcome of an action. Similar to Mill’s belief, if the outcome were to bring more happiness to the community as a whole than pain, than that decision is just. However, Mill believed that to make a proper and good decision required using the analyzing the consequences of each action. The only desirable goal in the eyes of Mill is pleasure, and as Bentham also believed pleasure of the community as a whole.…

    • 513 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this paper I will reconstruct Singer’s argument as well as argue why his argument is unsound. In Singer’s paper, Famine, Affluence and Morality, he argues that any kind of suffering from lack of food, healthcare and shelter is a bad thing. He further argues that if we have the ability to prevent something bad from happening, that it is our duty as moral beings to prevent suffering unless we have to sacrifice something of significant moral importance. In class we called it the prevent suffering principle. An example that Singer gives is of the prevent suffering principle is to imagine a young child drowning in a shallow pond.…

    • 815 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For this assignment the class explored the topic of Utilitarianism. In utilitarianism, the concept is to maximize satisfaction in society. Utilitarianism is then broken down into two perspectives that a person can view the situation between. They are Act Utilitarianism or Rule Utilitarianism. From the perspective of an Act Utilitarian, the main focus is on the reasoning behind a person’s choices.…

    • 950 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Freda's Case

    • 1736 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Nurses play a central role in advocating for their patients. In the case of Freda, the moral conflict between the nurse and physician revolves around the implementation of a feeding tube, in which the nurses feel does not respect Freda’s wishes. In utilitarianism, the beneficence principle means the value of the good (Collier & Haliburton, 2015, p. 440). In Freda’s case she defines good as dying peacefully. In Kantianism, the principle of autonomy states that the competent individual has the right to be self-determining (Collier & Haliburton, 2015, p. 440).…

    • 1736 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    He states, “if the greatest happiness of all is the end of human action, it must be the standard of morality.” (11) Opponents to this theory state that happiness is unattainable, and humans can do without it. Mill responds to this by clarifying that utilitarianism is not only the pursuit of happiness, but “the prevention of lessening happiness.” (11) Therefore, Mill concludes that utilitarianism is more necessary if happiness is unattainable.…

    • 1076 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    John Stuart Mill’s On Liberty attempts to broaden the meaning of utility and depict the usefulness of utilitarianism in terms of right protection. With this, Mill rejects the coercion of conformity and celebrates individuality. His work can be broken down into two basic principles. The first principle establishes that people are not accountable to society for the actions that only concern themselves.…

    • 977 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He says that in order to gain a definitive idea of the morality of a situation, one has to take into consideration the desires of every individual that is affected by the action. Only once every preference has been weighed up can a true decision be made; he states that “my interests cannot, simply because they are my interests, count more than the interests of anyone else”. This echoes ideas of negative utilitarianism simultaneously, in that Singer strived towards decreasing the level of suffering and pain rather than trying to increase the level of pleasure that was experienced. This may be because it is easier to define pain and suffering and it may be easier to reach a definitive conclusion of what causes pain rather than what causes pleasure, as people exhibit happiness in different ways and elicit varying levels of pleasure from different actions, but generally, immoral acts cause pain to others, and pain is more easily…

    • 1699 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays