• Home Page
  • How Does John Stuart Mill Contribute To Happiness

How Does John Stuart Mill Contribute To Happiness

Improved Essays
Show More
Mill aims to show that happiness is the only thing that humans ever desire. He acknowledges, though, that humans desire virtue just as authentically as we desire happiness, although less frequently than we desire happiness. This appears to reveal a problem with the kind of utilitarianism that Mill is presenting. If humans desire virtue and if virtue is something other than happiness, then happiness is not the sole object of human desire.
Mill attempts to solve this problem by considering virtue to be a part of happiness. He writes that, for those who seek and practice virtue in a disinterested way for virtue’s own sake, virtue has become not just a means to happiness, but part of their happiness. Thus, even when virtue is desired for itself,

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Kant's All Acceptable Maxim Analysis
    • 587 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Kant's All Acceptable Maxim Analysis

    Kant’s main idea is that the thought behind your actions is what determines if it’s wrong or right, not the outcome, he uses categorical imperative. So, the moral of your action is judged by the principal that provokes the action, not the outcome as I stated above. He calls these principles “maxim”. He says “the only acceptable maxim are those that can be defined as a universal law, because it is without exception” (pg.98). He uses an example of his view of morality of suicide.…

    • 587 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    John Stuart Mill's 'Utilitarianism'
    • 1497 Words
    • 6 Pages

    John Stuart Mill's 'Utilitarianism'

    It is believed that it is too strict a requirement for Utilitarianism to imply that we should always act solely to maximize happiness. It is then asking too much of people to be always centrally focused on promoting happiness for the general human population. Mill responds to such criticism by stating that “…no system of ethics requires that the sole motive of all we do shall be a feeling of duty,” but rather that “utilitarian moralists have gone beyond almost everyone in asserting that the motive has nothing to do with the morality of the action though it has much to do with the worth of the agent.” (13) This therefore, asserts that the motives behind an action will have nothing to do with whether or not we should complete an action solely based on its morality. He states that the great majority of these good actions are intended not for the benefit of the world, but for that of its…

    • 1497 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Great Essays

    John Stuart Mill Hedonism Analysis
    • 1387 Words
    • 6 Pages

    John Stuart Mill Hedonism Analysis

    Introduction: John Stuart Mill, although accepts the Radicals legacy in the utilitarian domain, he adds to and supplements their points of views, especially in the areas of human motivation and the true nature of happiness. When we read through Mill’s approach on happiness, we see how a lot of Radicals’ assumptions are modified, this can be seen in the second chapter of his essay: Utilitarianism. The Proportionality Doctrine is one of the most prominent concepts that emerge from his writing which suggests that actions are “right” when doing them leads to the highest amount of happiness as a lack of pain, and the reverse of this constitutes a “wrong” action. Here, happiness means pleasure which comes with the absence of pain, and unhappiness…

    • 1387 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Utilitarianism Is The Greatest Happiness Principle, By John Stuart Mill
    • 714 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Utilitarianism Is The Greatest Happiness Principle, By John Stuart Mill

    Mill defines utilitarianism as “actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness, wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness,” (484) He then begins to explain that happiness is the absence of pain, and pain is the absence of pleasure. He refers to utilitarianism as the Greatest Happiness Principle. Many people that disagreed with Mill’s definition of utilitarianism insulted his work by stating it as a “doctrine worthy only of swine,” (Mill 485). Mill responds to this attack by stating “...for if the sources of pleasure were precisely the same to human beings and to swine, the rule of which is good enough for the one would be good enough for the other,” (Mill 485). Mill responds to this insult by comparing human…

    • 714 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    John Stuart Mill's The Argument Of Utilitarianism
    • 1146 Words
    • 5 Pages

    John Stuart Mill's The Argument Of Utilitarianism

    Happiness is pleasure and the absence of pain versus unhappiness which is pain and the absences of pleasure. Mill thinks pleasures and happiness are the same. If something brings you pleasure, then you are happy. Just as if you are happy something has brought you pleasure. Take for example food, it is only desired to stop and/or prevent hunger which brings happiness to the person starving.…

    • 1146 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    The Moral Theory Of Mill's Greatest Happiness Principles
    • 1145 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Moral Theory Of Mill's Greatest Happiness Principles

    Through Mill’s view on Utilitarianism there emerges a core moral theory called the greatest happiness principle. However, I believe that Mill’s Greatest Happiness Principle is false. I believe this because after examining his theory I noticed several flaws within his theory. Before I say what is wrong with Mill’s argument and theory I want to address the definition of the greatest happiness principle and what all it encompasses. Mill believes that “actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness, [and] wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness” (Mill,97).…

    • 1145 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    John Stuart Mill Utilitarianism Summary
    • 809 Words
    • 4 Pages

    John Stuart Mill Utilitarianism Summary

    Today we routinely differentiate between hedonism as a theory of the good and utilitarianism as a consequentialist theory of the right. Mill, however, considered both doctrines to be so closely intertwined that he used the term ‘utilitarianism’ to signify both theories. On the one hand, he says that the “utilitarian doctrine is, that happiness is desirable, and the only thing desirable, as an end.” (CW 10, 234) On the other hand, he defines utilitarianism as a moral theory according to which “actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness…”…

    • 809 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Utilitarianism And Morality, By John Stuart Mill And Peter Singer
    • 1033 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Utilitarianism And Morality, By John Stuart Mill And Peter Singer

    In Mill’s essay, he claims that the essence of Utilitarianism is summarized by the Greatest Happiness Principle. He goes on to explain the principle and writes, “actions…

    • 1033 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Compare And Contrast John Stuart Mill's View Of Happiness
    • 1325 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Compare And Contrast John Stuart Mill's View Of Happiness

    In regard to ideas about happiness, Mill introduces a concept he came up with which he calls the Greatest Happiness Principle. Of his principle, Mill says, “actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness, wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness,” (Utilitarianism, pg. 229). This principle obviously aligns with his utilitarian beliefs because he would suggest using to gauge how people feel about certain actions and if the largest number of people were not happy about these actions then they would have to be undone for not following the premise of utilitarianism. In his book, Mill speaks of many clarifications and objections to his own principle as a way to disregard critics of utilitarianism. Because he is utilitarian, one of the most important clarifications of his idea of happiness that he offers is that it does not matter if one person is unhappy.…

    • 1325 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Essay On Immanuel Kant And John Stuart Mill
    • 1751 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Essay On Immanuel Kant And John Stuart Mill

    Conversely, John Stuart Mill, who wrote, “The Greatest Happiness Principle”, is well known as a utilitarian, who stress the greatest happiness for the greatest amount. While they may have disagreed about what makes an action ethical, Kant and Mill are both extremely significant philosophers. Further acknowledgement of the contrasting…

    • 1751 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    John Stuart Mill's Theory Of Utilitarianism
    • 1239 Words
    • 5 Pages

    John Stuart Mill's Theory Of Utilitarianism

    There are also many conflicting situations that people face since their judgments of pleasure are different. This disprove Mill’s argument that pleasure’s quality is one of the main part of moral actions. His logic of high quality pleasure is hard to prove since everyone’s happiness is different. A result might have different meanings to varied people, so it is hard to find the sum of happiness. Morality is balanced to people’s true happiness, but not based on the sum of…

    • 1239 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Groundwork Of The Metaphysics Of Morals By Kant And John Stuart Mill
    • 1510 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Groundwork Of The Metaphysics Of Morals By Kant And John Stuart Mill

    This is based on the Utilitarian principle that one should act towards the greatest good for the greatest number of people. This promotes happiness and pleasure while condemning anything that causes pain. Mill believes that the purpose for any person’s actions is to experience pleasure or to avoid pain. Though this ultimate telos for happiness may seem like a good system, there are flaws that do not coincide with human nature. One issue with this theory is that it does not take into consideration that different people have different preferences and ideas of what is pleasurable.…

    • 1510 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    John Stuart Mill: The Morality Of Chapter 2 Of Utilitarianism
    • 1076 Words
    • 5 Pages

    John Stuart Mill: The Morality Of Chapter 2 Of Utilitarianism

    He states, “if the greatest happiness of all is the end of human action, it must be the standard of morality.” (11) Opponents to this theory state that happiness is unattainable, and humans can do without it. Mill responds to this by clarifying that utilitarianism is not only the pursuit of happiness, but “the prevention of lessening happiness.” (11) Therefore, Mill concludes that utilitarianism is more necessary if happiness is unattainable.…

    • 1076 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Decent Essays

    John Stuart Mill's Autobiography Analysis
    • 173 Words
    • 1 Pages

    John Stuart Mill's Autobiography Analysis

    John Stuart mill in his autobiography “A Crisis in My Mental History One Stage Onward” (1909-14),argues that you should not look for happiness but you should help others and on the way you will find your happiness. He supports his claim by first saying that if we focus on others mankind will be better and we all would be able to find happiness. Mill’s purpose is to show that if we all were nice to each other and helped each other the world would be better. He creates a serious tone for his American audience. What I thought of John Stuart mill’s autobiography.…

    • 173 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
    Read More
  • Great Essays

    Disadvantages Of John Stuart Mill's Theory Of Happiness
    • 1492 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Disadvantages Of John Stuart Mill's Theory Of Happiness

    Utilitarianism is a normative moral approach to ethics that tries to maximise the pleasure and minimises the amount of pain in given a situation. John Stuart Mill analysis the principle of Utility, Utility meaning ‘happiness’. Mill often thought it was important that in any given situation that happiness is supposed to continue to be uplifted (Mill, 1864 p.9). Mill examines, that happiness is the ultimate end in which every human lives their life to, and so anything has to be a means for that end to happen (Mill, 1864 p.52). In linguistic terms, it can be described as a “’theory of usefulness’”…

    • 1492 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
    Read More

Related Topics

Ready To Get Started?
Discover
Company
Follow
©2024 Cram.com
Privacy Policy |  About Ads |  Site Map |  Advertise  | 
  • Cookie Settings