Milgram Experiment Reflection

Decent Essays
When I watched the video of the Milgram Experiment I was quite shocked by it. Seeing people so willing to do harm on another person without being threatened was very disturbing, and seeing the few that was pleading to stop was heart breaking. When I put myself in their shoes, I would like to think that I would not harm anyone or anything. However, in all fairness to the idea of what I would do I must evaluate the environment and conditions to which I would have been exposed. If I knew that this was an experiment and the other party was a willing participant from the beginning; I could see myself shocking the other person at first, but when they began to express more that a slight pain from the shock I would have a problem with being able

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Stanely Milgram was a social phycologist who conducted an experiment in 1963 about nonviolent people being capable of hurting others due to obeying the authority under pressure despite their feeling of remorse. The way the experiment received progression was by having people play the role of a teacher and a learner. The teacher obeys the authority and the learner had to memorize a certain amount of words. If the learner failed to the duty, he would received a punishment of a dose of high voltage shock. Although the purpose of the experiment was to test how the learner was capable of learning, it to was to test the capability of the teacher to continue the experiment whether or not they felt guilt.…

    • 456 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the articles “Just Do What the Pilot Tells You” and “Review of Stanly Milgram’s Experiments on Obedience,” authors Theodore Dalrymple and Diana Baumrind describe the aspects of the Stanley Milgram experiment, while they both partake different topics to discuss. Dalrymple, a British physician, claims that there is a difference between blind obedience and blind disobedience, and there should be a healthy balance between the two (Dalrymple 119). However, Baumrind believes that the subjects should have been treated in a more enhanced way; therefore, claiming that the experiment unsuitably took advantage of the inherent trust and obedience given by the subject when volunteering to participate (Baumrind 89). These two articles are relevant to…

    • 902 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Many agree that the Milgram experiment could not be reproduced today due to its circumstances. According to Chapter 1 in the book, concealing the true intent of an experiment is entirely ethical in psychological research for the sake of experimental validity. The experimenter’s lie that the experiment was about the effects of punishment on learning rather than compliance to obedience is perfectly fine, since the results might not have been as accurate otherwise. The real issue comes with the emotional trauma that the experiment could cause to its participants. The mental damage that comes from knowing that you are capable of such horrible things just because someone told you to do them is quite a glaring issue in the experiment.…

    • 1464 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Stanley Milgram, a Yale University psychologist, began an experiment in July 1961 that would drastically alter society’s perception of obedience. Milgram formulated a test to comprehend how far people would perform when coerced into obeying an authoritative figure. The experiment involved subjects being tricked into believing they were electrically shocking another individual; physical and emotional harm to the subjects was followed, resulting from the extreme tension they encountered. Ultimately, Milgram thought he found an underlying connection between his experiment and the Holocaust. The study manufactured mixed reactions from society.…

    • 821 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The primary purpose of the Milgram's obedience/electroshock experiment was to test people's obedience to authority. I feel the test was able to fulfill its objectives. It was successful because it should that the majority of people tested were willing to fully accept, with some reservations, what a authority figure instructed them to do. In The Real World by Ferris and Stein (2008), we are told that to conducted the experiment a system was set were a research subject was assigned being a teacher and then two others who were administering the test would join, one as experimenter, the other as a learner. The teacher was then shown the learner being strapped to a chair and electrodes being attracted to there body.…

    • 1361 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Pressure from an outside source can leave people in an undesirable situation which causes them to change their beliefs. For example, in the Milgram experiment, individuals were tested to see how far obedience will take them into hurting other individuals. The objective of the…

    • 1029 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Stanley Milgram Outline

    • 3385 Words
    • 14 Pages

    1. Explain and discuss the background events and ideas which led to Milgram’s research. Stanley Milgram (1963) was a American social psychologist who carried out the destructive obedience experiment at Yale University in 1963. He was very interested in how far people would go in a situation where it meant hurting another person under an authority figures orders. If an authority figure affected obedience levels in everyday American men. This idea came about after Adolf Eichmann's trial in Jerusalem in 1961.…

    • 3385 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The experiment was designed “to see how far a person will proceed in a concrete and measurable situation in which he is ordered to inflict increasing pain on a protesting victim” (Milgram 79). Milgram discovered that many people were willing to go all the way to 450 volts when ordered by the experimenter. He concluded that the majority of people will go against their conscience if the authority shows unwavering power and determination to accomplish a…

    • 1739 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He claims that the subject needed a clearer way to disobey to improve this experiment. Milgram would argue that in real life scenarios no one tells you that you can disobey if you want, it is up to the individual if they certainly feel uncomfortable and uneasy to stand up for their morals. An article over Milgram and his experience from Wayne State University’s psychology department would logically bring attention to the credentials of Yale University and how that may affect the subjects’ thoughts: Why would you think that a large highly regarded university performs potentially dangerous experiments to random volunteers (Wayne State)? It discusses how this is a relevant factor in the subjects decision making. Milgram would state that the Nazis were in the same boat.…

    • 946 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Diana Baurind Experiment Analysis

    • 886 Words
    • 4 Pages
    • 4 Works Cited

    Because the experiment takes place in a laboratory, Baumrind argues that participants will not act how they might in the real world. She states that the laboratory is an unaccustomed setting for a typical being and may cause anxiety and passivity (225). Correspondingly, Saul Mcleod, a psychologist who summarizes and critiques Milgram’s experiment, states that the “important” location of the experiment, obedience levels increased (Simply Psychology). The point about setting is one in which Baumrind and Parker are able to reach a consensus.…

    • 886 Words
    • 4 Pages
    • 4 Works Cited
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    the experiment involed an 11 months old baby responding to stimuli to exhibit the fear within him. The experiment was a success but had ramification on the baby due to no rehabilitation and recovey from the trauma experience of the child. The Milgram experiment shows another inhumane act. The Milgram Experiment , Milgram (1963).…

    • 498 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The main conflict of Milgram 's experience which can be argued for both sides, that really settled the point where the experiment became unethical was the fact that patients could be considered to be psychologically harmed, even though the debriefing and explanations it could still have an effect on patient mind and…

    • 929 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Milgram’s experiments created great controversy. They showed how vulnerable humans were to the will bending power of authority. This idea especially stuck around the time the experiment took place, the early 1960’s. America was still somewhat fresh off of World War II, and Americans were shocked to see that they were just as capable of being pushed to do things that went against their morals as Germans were under Nazi authorities. Milgram was thorough in his studies by including multiple permutations of the original where he tested subjects responses to different forms of authority.…

    • 1487 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the Bystander Effect experiment it gets called unethical because it was believed that participants had long lasting psychiatric problems for thinking that they harmed someone. Also at the begging of the experiment the researcher could not tell the participants their real goals since it might mess up the results of the experiment. the Belmont report would claim that this experiment will have a negative impact on the test participants. The Milgram experiment also lead their subject to believe that they were harming someone. To put the idea that the participants almost killed someone and never to fix the participants at the end of the experiment makes this experiment unethical.…

    • 864 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Diana Baumrind often disagreed with the ethics of the Milgram Experiment; however, Ian Parker took on a different perspective than she. Diana Baumrind, author of, Review of Stanley Milgram 's Experiments on Obedience, claims in his experiments the ethics he possessed were immoral and wrong. Throughout her article she continually disagreed with everything Milgram had "achieved", starting from the first experiments results which appeared as a review in American Psychologist in 1963 (Baumrind 89). While Diana disputed what she thought was the atrocious ethics of Milgram 's experiments, she furthermore believed Milgram should have debriefed the subjects more than what he had done (95). Although Baumrind opinionated her thoughts on these issues,…

    • 734 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays