Meursault Catharsis Analysis

Improved Essays
Does Meursault’s catharsis affect his own existentialist behavior? Meursault’s catharsis affects people such as the chaplain who was attack by Meursault in which eventually led to his own existentialist behavior. Meursault relief opens himself to “the gentle indifference of the world” (Camus 122). His lack of emotions towards caring indicates that he is different than the rest of the world. Through Meursault release of anger towards the chaplain, he demonstrates his hatred towards death, religion and God. These ideas led to the solidification existentialist behavior which emphasizes Meursault’s own meaning in life with freedom and choices that eventually illustrates him as a social stranger.
To begin with, death led to Meursault’s anger
…show more content…
He says, “Drawing himself up to his full height and asked me if I believed in God. I said no. He sat down indignantly. He said it was impossible; all men believed in God, even those who turn their backs on him” (Camus 11). Meursault doesn’t believe in God because it ties in with religion. Religion is based on the idea that we pray and ask God for help and forgiveness. The idea of religion is tied to God where we go church because God is there. The idea of that is when people are religious they see God as being the most important man in life, how he created life, and so God was religious in which he, himself, would pray and confess his sins, etc. On the other hand, Meursault doesn’t seem to apprehend the idea of people brining up God to him. It’s possible he doesn’t believe in the spirit because he didn’t see him as being the highest and most important hierarchy in life. He just doesn’t like the idea of external force because he doesn’t see an importance towards believing him. Meursault never likes the idea because he doesn’t feel that by asking for God for help, it won’t help him. He feels that him making his choices are moral and God is not moral. This means that Meursault makes meaning his own in meaning where in life whatever happens, happens. He feels that believing in the spirt will make his choices and he doesn’t want that. In life, some people believe that Holy Spirit has a plan for us, humans, in how we life live and Meursault doesn’t have a plan. Meursault doesn’t bother worry about the future and this explains why since he just wants to live his life in the present. This implies to the idea him that he won’t overthink about the future because he is in center of the idea of waking up to everyday life. The idea of the spirit connects to existentialist because he dislike the idea of the spirit being in his life that he chooses to make his own views. This shows that

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Meursault Love Quotes

    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Meursault’s lack of love and affection towards Marie, and his refusal to understand her emotions, further categorized him in the class of a sociopath, not an existentialist. As Meursault and Marie spent their morning together Meursault thought, This quote provides evidence for Meursault’s sociopathic behavior, as he portrays himself as a sensation seeking individual and seems to only want Marie for her ability to provide him with sexual and materialistic pleasures. Throughout the novel, he repeatedly brushes off her romantic advances when he does not wish to have sex with her and ignores her opinions and thoughts about how to move their relationship forward. This is typical behavior for a sociopath, as they often leave their lovers dangling on…

    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The twin relation of this is death, it is Harun noticing that someone can be shot to death quickly or the death of others slowly by starvation, the result is still death. This echo’s Meursault’s realization of the futility of life, that there is only one outcome,…

    • 1475 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Other Wes Moore Legacy

    • 1610 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The authors of these books assert that the meaning of life lies in the legacy one leaves behind, not necessarily in the actions that they perform while on earth. To begin, one of many characters who leaves an impact on the way humans view the world is Philippe Petit. Petit is the…

    • 1610 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The existentialist theory emphasizes choice and free will of a person and the individual will determine their own outcomes based on choice. Jean-Paul Sartre was a leading philosopher of existentialism and believed that there are no blueprints to one’s individual life. There is no purpose rather than to find their own purpose and build upon it. We are a product of our choices and we are who we choose to be. We determine our fate which determines our freedom.…

    • 1043 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Meursault was constantly being badgered about the fact that he has no beliefs in any sort of religion. A court of law is meant to have a clear separation of church and state. Near the end of the novel, the chaplain essentially tells Meursault that if he tells him he believes in god, he would be able to save him from his fate, “ I said that i didn’t believe in god… God can help you, he said… every man i have known in your position has turned to him” (Camus 116). In the end, Meursault stood by the fact that he didn’t believe in god, or life after death. Ultimately his beliefs were his demise.…

    • 392 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Moliere believed in the religious hypocrisy and fanaticism. Candide satirized the European society by criticizing the hypocrisy of the clergy. Voltaire supported the importance of flexible thinking and scientific reasoning. Even though he believed in the existence of God, he was still judgmental of critical of revealed religion as well as of religious optimism and fanaticism. Tartuffe was an evaluation of religions hypocrisy as expressed in Tartuffe.…

    • 907 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nagel tends to point out that there is no meaning in life, but not much about what to do about this realization. Existentialists argue that life’s authentic existence has to start with the recognition of the nothingness that is life. This point is were they separate from Camus and Nagel, because existentialists from life, one is at complete liberty to make the free choices that will dictate and define the meaning of an individual life. Sartre importantly argues, that first, comes man’s existence, then (after), through life he defines himself. Sartre argues that nothing is a result of built in human nature, or nothing is predetermined for a person, essentially it is all up to what a person decides to make of his or her life.…

    • 1182 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In the novel The Stranger, the author Albert Camus emphasizes the absurdities of life and he does this by striking the audience with Meursault’s blunt nature and his embodiment of existentialism. The novel explores existentialist ideology which represent the philosophy of life essentially being “pointless” .Since the message of existentialism can have a powerful negative connotation it can be surprising to understand how Meursault can be considered anything close to free especially , considering the freedom he gained happened after he committed murder but that’s what happened considering the sequence of events , since his routine hindered him from the enlightenment he gained from being captured. The Webster dictionary defines freedom as “the power or right to act, speak,…

    • 1604 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Strange Character of Meursault In what perhaps is Albert Camus’s most notable work, The Stranger, the main character Meursault can be considered as a vessel for the philosophy of existentialism, an idea prominent in the time period in which the novel was written. Though at first glance Meursault may come off as a simple, uncaring man, as the story progresses, the reader is able to see Meursault as a complex and intriguing person. While in the beginning of the book Meursault is focused only on completing his physical needs, when his ability to fulfill them is taken away from him in prison, he is forced to truly think about his life, becoming fully absurdist in his philosophy. From the very start of the story, the author…

    • 1053 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Inside Albert Camus’s The Stranger, Camus portrays Meursault as an absurd hero. Meursault was attached to the physical world, and he was different from a normal individual. Meursault would have a direct impact from the “shimmering heat” (17) of the sun, which ultimately caused him to “squeeze his hand around [his] revolver” (59) and kill an Arab. As a result, Meursault had to live in jail, and he had to change his routine. He would spend “sixteen to eighteen hours a day” (79) sleeping, and his time would pass slowly.…

    • 1372 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Meursault’s society uses morality as a way to establish structure in a world that is, according to existentialists, fundamentally irrational. Humans, being mortal and having limited understanding, cannot help but make sense of their world through what they know: boundaries. Civilization has shown that humans have a propensity to change their surroundings to a more favorable, comprehendible environment, and they do so partly by instituting rules. These rules provide a framework for people to fall into and constitute what we consider conventional morality – actions and thoughts deemed socially acceptable, limits on what people should and should not do. Meursault’s society tries to make sense of his seemingly unexplainable murder by fixating on…

    • 1863 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Existentialism is a philosophy that the choices individual makes should be responsible for it and should accept their own act without consent of other people. Its beliefs are centred on the idea of finding the meaning of life through different choices and situations. In the view of existentialist, this world is meaningless and absurd. It is the way that let external factor affect us that determine who we are. As individuals we have freedom to make our own choices and that’s what life's all about.…

    • 1230 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    During his trial his nonchalant behavior after Maman’s death becomes the courts main focus and the basis determination of whether he is guilty or innocent. By using Fletcher I will explore the context of the idea of being guilty and by using Foucault I will explain the idea following the act of punishment. The way Meursault intermingles with society and who he interacts with is the reason behind the court’s guilty verdict. According to the jury, Meursault appeared guilty because he is a person that is detached from his emotions and the prosecutor made a compelling case by linking him to his friend’s (Raymond) crime.…

    • 1490 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Stranger, Albert Camus’ debut novel, illustrates and reflects the view of absurdity of life using the main character, Meursault, as a catalyst. On a surface level, absurdism is perceived through Meursault alone. However, on a deeper level through Meursault, other characters act as a source of absurdity as different situations are forced upon them. Camus achieves this level of complexity by creating and establishing Meursault as a very absent and undistinguished main character, who holds no strongly applied emotions or opinions. In doing this, the characters around Meursault who justify his actions are distinguished as being and reacting to him in an absurd way.…

    • 1226 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    All others “drown” in its complexity and depth. He goes on to say in lines eighty-nine through ninety-two that the equally difficult to understand concept of divine predestination is contained within the concepts laid out in the rest of his discussion, although he does not delve into it. In final summary on lines ninety-three through ninety-five, he summarizes, writing that good and evil are predetermined to exist necessarily and adding that good and evil come to be only after a prior choice on the part of God. This statement does not answer the question of how God can have volition if good and evil come into being by necessity. The only possible explanation is that since good and evil come to be only after the act of divine volition, the act itself may not be a necessary one, only the result of the action (good and evil coming to be).…

    • 1377 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays