Max Weber's Theory In Modern Society

Decent Essays
Max Weber is one of the most recognizable names in the subject of sociology. He is one of three canon theorists and stands alongside Karl Marx and Emile Durkheim. While many people consider the theoretical work of Emile Durkheim and Karl Marx to be outdated and not fitting in today’s time, Weber’s theory is perhaps closest to the societal structure that we have in our contemporary society. Max Weber had variety of interests. He was proficient in history, religion, economics, politics and sociology. Max Weber’s most famous work, The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism is his perhaps most accurate and detailed account on the historical growth and relation of capitalism with religion. He traced back the spirit of capitalism to the roots …show more content…
He continued to explain, in detail, the structural hierarchy of the iron cage and how it’s becoming stronger in our society. Weber’s work and understanding of the society enables us to relate his work in today’s society and its operations.

The term ‘iron cage’ and its analysis earned Max Weber respect and critique at the same time. Max weber was unsure about the coming modern of capitalism and viewed it with trepidation. In this essay we will try to answer the following question: Do Weber’s distinguished sociological writings assist Americans today, at the dawn of twenty-first century, to understand their own society and, in particular it political structure? In order to answer the question, we need to explore the historical perspective on the Protestant ethic presented by Max Weber in his book, The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism. Calvinism gave birth to the spirit of capitalism. Working was considered as a virtue, and unlike Catholic teachings, Calvinism allowed its members to collect interest on loans. This alone spurred an economic activity within the group. The members were encouraged to learn and bring their own
…show more content…
Weber’s analysis of modernity was far away from the many social Darwinist theorists who saw and termed industrial age as progress. They saw it as a stepping stone for our civilization towards becoming an advanced civilization. Weber also differentiated himself from the theorists of democracy, who defined the industrialized world in terms of broad and deep civic realm. If he were alive and were to confront the modernization theorists, he would deeply disagree with their notion of capitalism bringing forth

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Misael Sanchez World of Business Sept. 25, 2017 “Money, Greed, and God” by Jay W. Richards Chapters 1& 2 Analysis “Money, Greed, and god” Chapters One & Two Analysis” I perpetually rest assure that Capitalism is selfish and corrupt. Contemplating that greed hurts the poor and helps the rich, that greed is all about the desire for money and power. After reading the introduction and chapters one and two of Jay W. Richar ds book “Money, Greed and God: Why Capitalism is the Solution “, Richard certainly grasps my consideration and leads me towards to considering that a capitalistic economy is not a deficient concept after all and that a “good Christian can be, indeed should be, a good capitalist”. The author seems to structure the book…

    • 748 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Many of the works and theories of the social theorists during the 19th and early 20th century are still relevant today even with all the changes that we have gone through as a society. The issues discussed in Weber’s and Marx’s class theories; DuBois’ theories about race and Durkheim 's theories on society and labor are the basis on which many of today’s ideologies are derived. Karl Marx was a class theorist and theorized about class struggles and the ideal class society. He also had theories about the construction of society and the interaction between the wealthy and working classes which he called the bourgeoisie and the proletariats. One of his major ideas was that of alienation of the working class.…

    • 1063 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Social class can be defined in different ways, but to put it into layman 's terms, someone 's social class is purely how much money they make per year, which directly correlates with the people group that each individual chooses to “hang around”. When you look at someone 's social class, you can break it up into a few different groups, which are music, entertainment, food, religion, and cultural values. When it comes to music, there are differences between two main categories of sound which are, the stereotypical rich person music, and the equipment that they use. The type of music that a stereotypical rich person would listen to would be classical music or even today 's hits, but the instrumental version of their music because they can…

    • 1220 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this essay I will explain Karl Marx’s conception of the development of the bourgeoisie, the development of the proletariat and where Marx sees this struggle leads to. I will also explain the bourgeoisie's relationship to feudalism. I will then discuss how capitalism has limited human freedom and what Herbert Marcuse thinks capitalism has done to individual humans. At the end, I will analyze Marx and Marcuse’s criticisms and I will explain my opinion on their criticisms. Karl Marx is an economist and a philosopher that writes about the bourgeoisie and the proletariats.…

    • 802 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    After many generations of living on the same land, they are suddenly forced of the land and without work, because land owners want to make a profit off the land. “…economic land was created out of ancestral estates, and over the wails of protest from employees and masters alike…” (6) The sudden chance came from the idea that gaining profit whether a Christian or not was fine as long as it was for “the greater glory of God. ”(7) As ideas began to shift it opened a world where money was not seen as sin, but a blessing from God. The Church of Rome had fallen to Protestantism and people left the old ways to more modern ideas, becoming more tolerant with money.…

    • 1147 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The period of industrialization influenced the three classical sociological theorists, Marx, Durkheim and Weber. Marx thought of industrialization in the most negative of ways compared to the other sociological theorists. With the rise of industrialization, the social classes changed to who was related to the mean of production, so the owners of the factories and machinery were called the bourgeois, who had more power than the proletariat, those working in the factories, creating the product. With this class distinction, Marx believed that it would lead to problems and conflict between the classes, because each class had their own interest, for instance, the bourgeoisie might be more interested in creating a product faster and cheaper, while…

    • 1399 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Sociological Theories

    • 1522 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Briefly contrast two theories of the ruling class covered in week 9. The two theories discussed were Marxist theory and Weber’s theory. Marxist theory consist of two main classes: the proletariat and bourgeois. Marxist theory explains how someone’s class is determined based on their role, either the worker or the capitalist.…

    • 1522 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Max Weber’s key concept was rationalization. This refers to the eradication of mystery and emotion from everyday life and their replacement by rational calculation and control. This essay will discuss Weber’s contribution towards sociology in terms of rationalization and his attribution to ‘The Protestant Ethic’. It will introduce Weber’s key approaches, such as social theory, rationalization in regards to modern society, bureaucracy, the ideal type and a contemporary example of rationalization. Furthermore, capitalism will be discussed, in order to depict Weber’s theories in comparison to Marx’s.…

    • 2122 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Both Weber and Foucault conceptualised power and domination in different ways. Weber saw power in terms of authority that emanated and descended from above via powerful agents whereas Foucault saw power as an agentless horizontal force (Rudolph, 2006, p. 3). The differences between the three social theorists and their respected theories is that Marx focuses on economic power, particularly social and economic relationships and how it contributed to production. It was Marx’s belief that the ideal achievement of socialism led to equality and liberation. Weber contrasts to Marx by concentrating on status and rationalisation, believing that Marxism meant that the state had too much control and it potentially could lead to loss of freedoms for the individual.…

    • 1874 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    In Max Weber’s arguably most influential work, The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism, Weber argues that a specific religious ethic shaped how Capitalism spread across the globe and transitioned into the modern age. Influenced by the idea of the ‘calling’ or one’s worldly task determined by God (39), this ethic actually incentivized people to work more in their mundane, secular occupations in order to accumulate physical wealth as an indication of God’s favor. Overall, this essay will be a self-discussion of the various ideas Weber introduces as well as other topics that caught my attention while reading his work. One aspect I like about Weber is his approach to understand modern Capitalism as a product of religion.…

    • 1764 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Karl Marx and Emile Durkheim are two of the founding figures of sociology. They were the first to explore the relationship between the economy and society in the nineteenth and twentieth century, each developing different perspectives of society. Despite them having significantly different views on modern capitalism, they both played a prominent role in the development of sociology as an academic discipline. This essay provides a biography of Marx and Durkheim and the major works they published. It then focuses on the intellectual and historical contributions they have made and how their works are still influential to contemporary society.…

    • 1069 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Karl Marx, Emile Durkheim and Max Weber are three fundamental figureheads in the foundation of sociology who asserted that our lifestyles are products of the society in which we live. They all lived in a period of great social change, that of the Industrial Revolution, and based their writings and musings upon what they observed happening around them and extrapolated as to the condition of the future. One foundational product of contemporary societies, that truly came into existence at the time during which they were writing, would be the economy and economic life. Looking at it on a macro level perspective, it is one of the aspects of the social superstructure. It is a social institution by itself, but it also shares a give and take relationship with other institutions in society and the superstructure such as education, ethics, law, religion, etc.…

    • 1198 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Not greed but encourages good work “A calling” – working at it 4. What does Weber mean when he argues that cultural values circumscribe social action? Cultural values circumscribe social action by focusing attention on just your values which limits your actions. Belongings are only objectionable because of this risk of relaxation; only activity promotes God's glory. Thus, wasting time is the worst of sins, because it means that time is lost in promoting God's will in a calling.…

    • 567 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Weber, a German sociologist and political economist throughout the nineteenth and twentieth centuries continued to…

    • 1171 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Marx and Durkheim 's explanation of social changes differ because both of their theories have differences on the essential makeup of modern society. They were both concerned with the emergence of modern society and the division of labor. However for Marx a revolution was necessary for change and for Durkheim was interested in improving society not removing the capitalist social construct. Social change from Marx focus mainly on economics Marx theory looked at how we produced and exchanged goods in order to survive and that shaped how people related to each other.…

    • 1206 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays