Essay Mary Shelley 's Frankenstein - Natural Imagery

1563 Words 7 Pages
The natural imagery in Frankenstein is said to be comparable to the best in the literature of Romance. Mary Shelley juxtaposes the horrendous spectacle of the monster and the gracious vision of Nature for the spectacle in the story to enhance the natural environment figures in Frankenstein. We cannot deny the story never has beautiful element, but oppositely we can confirm the non beautiful or uncanny element in the novel of Frankenstein.
About Victor Frankenstein’s man made monster, which is extremely ugly, has no bound to the aesthetic theory or the beautiful element of aesthetic theory. The element of grotesque may seem related to, but it is never invoked in specific. So in fact, because the ugly does not have comic effect, it only can be treat as an opposite element of the beautiful.
Since aesthetic theory is the philosophy of beauty if we define it narrowly. Or as the original definition of aesthetic theory, it is the philosophical theory governing the idea of beauty under a given circumstance. To the subject of the uncanny, it belongs to things that are terrible, to all things that arouse dead and creeping horror. It also occupies the vague region of aesthetics, so the only distinguish of uncanny in certain things is the bound of what is fearful. Thus I personally consider the element in Frankenstein as a negative to beautiful or the uncanny element of aesthetic theory.
Mary Shelley delivers a message that is loud and clear, which is do not mess with Nature for the…

Related Documents