Why Is Karl Marx Interested In Capitalism

Great Essays
Introduction
Karl Marx was a sociologist during the nineteenth century. His main interests were that of epistemology, politics, human nature and capitalism. Marx was heavily influenced by the ideas of Georg Friedrich Hegel. Hegel “advanced” the notion that when ideas occur and progress when opposites clash and are confronted. Which means that theory meets a contrasting theory which results in a fusion of sorts of the two. (88 MSOMT) It is suggested that Marx became interested in capitalism when he saw the “unanticipated effects” of capitalism. (64 eicst)This is arguably his most important scientific contribution as it looks further than his fellow political economists. They looked at private property commodities, profit and the division of
…show more content…
This was in fact not the case as Marx argues that because of the “exploitation of labour” and “overproduction” cracks form in the economy creating recession and in turn capitalism is affected. (64-65 EICST) Marx has said that the exploitation of labour is the main driving force of capitalism. This is due to the extra work that labourers would do that they would not be getting paid for. This can be seen as him feeling the labourer as mistreated and in such paves the way to a communist society. Marx predicted that capitalism will undo itself by ‘sowing the seeds of its own destruction’ p90 (MSOST). Therefore, by this meaning Marx believes that capitalism is a “historical phenomenon” which means that capitalism has a beginning, middle and end. (25 CAMST) . His theory is more focused on the origin of capital and the mode of operation as looking to the future of capital can be quite complicated. He believed that to understand capitalism it must be shown actual developments and actions of the people at that time. He spoke lightly of the future and he refused to “write recipes for the soup kitchens of the future”.(24 CAMST) Thusly, his theory mainly focus on his anlysis of the “laws” ordaining the growth and collapse of capatilism. Marx’s law of “accumulation” of capital ordered the growth of capitalist market economies. Marx believed that the …show more content…
This centralization was Marx’s prediction that the people would suffer even more “extreme class division”. This would cause the negative effects of the poor becoming poorer and the rich becoming richer. The main point that he gives is that the middle class would be split up and divided into the two catagories of lower class and upper class. His reason behind this is that the middle class are mainly “self-employed” and so the successful people would go to the upper class. This is done by “hiring employees”. The rest would be put in the lower class which is the people doing labour. This is done by “accepting a job”. (92 MSOST) Marx later goes on to say that after the gradual passing of time workers would lose decision-making authority on the way they do their work and this would eventually “de-skill” the worker. The growth of the production of machinery and the expansion of the machinery in the work environment would be a key component to this “de-skilling of the worker. This can clearly be seen in today’s world as many people are losing their jobs to machines and in such are “losing the race against machine”. McAfee and Brynjolfsson, authors of the book “Losing the Race Against the Machine”, state that technology is taking over “service” jobs which results in the loss of work in automation of farm and factory work. They later warn the reader:
“This last repository of jobs is shrinking — fewer of us in the future may have

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Marx argued that the bourgeoisie controlled the means of production, wage labour and amassed majority of the wealth as a result, which equated to the power to dominate and define society. The opposing end, the proletariat, were constantly oppressed and left alienated because they maintained no power or ability to rectify their position within society. In addition, specifically within a capitalistic society, there was no opportunity for a meritocracy; so even if the proletariats were highly skilled, they remained pigeonholed with no chance for social mobility without a direct shift within the economic structure of society. When examining this multifarious relationship, Marx asserted in the Manifesto of the Communist Party, “The modern bourgeoisie society that has sprouted from the ruins of feudal society has not done away with class antagonisms. It has but established new classes, new conditions of oppression, new forms of struggle in place of the old ones” (Marx.)…

    • 1263 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Marx thought it only a matter of time before the working class as a whole rose up and over threw the rich. That the line would eventually be pushed too far, that the workers would reach the end of what they were willing to endure. Bourgeois and proletarians, or the rich and the poor were in a constant struggle for control and that the proletarians would eventually rise up and take control of what was rightfully theirs. That the workers could and would take being ground into the dirt for the gain of others for only so long. Once the proletarians had taken control, the means of production would be distributed among publically owned corporations.…

    • 2117 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Marx believed that a violent overthrow of capitalism would lead to international socialism based on common ownership of land and capital. This would transform into an ideal state of communism, which is a worker-governed society based on the guiding concept “from each according to ability, and to each according to need” (Bolotta, Hawkes, Mahoney, Piper, 2002, pg. 58). This theory influenced many revolutions that would take place in the world. For example, the Russian Revolution in 1917, led by Lenin who said he has the philosophical heir to Marx (Schaff, 2009). Both Marx and Lenin are considered to be the two most important figures in the development of communism in the Soviet Union.…

    • 918 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The goal of the capitalist is to achieve the largest profit margin as possible. The workers can usually never own anything except their labor, which is their means of making money. Marx lived during the industrial revolution, which saw the advent of tremendous wealth due to the large number of factories being built during this time. Living and working conditions were sub par for the working class during these times. People worked really long and laborious hours for generally a small amount of money, which in turn made the factory owners abundantly wealthy.…

    • 827 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Porter Income Inequality

    • 674 Words
    • 3 Pages

    He also shows that the portion of national income owned by the bottom fifth of the population changes in both directions (although more heavily downward) over time. This reflects processes of ebbs and flows, which once again contrast Marx’s vision of a one-way street toward equality through the breakdown of class. Finally, Marx argued that the proletariat would gain a sense of “class consciousness” and rebel against the bourgeoisie, giving way to a more equal society. In this article, though, there is no mention of any revolutionary sentiments among the working class against the capitalists. This may add a level of complexity to Marx’s theory where there may be other factors that promote solidarity other than class.…

    • 674 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Karl Marx is well known around the political world as the creator of the philosophy of Communist government party. Marx was a scholarly man who was denied a university position, so he resided to a journalism career until his conflict with Prussian authorities because of his radical political views. Due to this, Marx resided to London and it was in this location that Karl released his work, Communist Manifesto. The text Communist Manifesto introduced all what was wrong with the working class and social classes of the world. Marx names several suggestions in the three parts of the book to help better the government of the world.…

    • 1152 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In The Communist Manifesto, Marx believes that the working class will overthrow the ruling capitalist class. During the Industrial Revolution in England, the two classes that become defined is the bourgeoisie, which are considered middle class and the proletariat, which are the working class. The modern industry and large capitalists took over small businesses owners, and these groups of people become part of the working class. The proletariat class is large in size compared to the bourgeoisie therefore; wages decrease for manual labor workers while profits increase for capitalist. He believed that the influence of the capitalist extended beyond where the good is produced and into many countries because this is the only way for them to increase their profits.…

    • 635 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Adam Smith Research Paper

    • 859 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Unlike Adam Smith, Marx doesn’t come right out to discuss if he believes that the market should remain free, or government controlled. Marx believes that each type of production from different era is unique in its own way. He doesn’t believe in the progression of capitalism, because as I stated before each type of production is unique, and this includes capitalism. Marx’s believes that the act of consumption, and production are both social acts. This is true, because the cooperation of everybody in a society is required to make the economy successful.…

    • 859 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Both Marx and Weber have contributed an important insight into the understanding of society and classical sociology. Their work can be compared similarly, with both theorists recognizing the exploitative nature of capitalism and a definition that equates to the rational process of accumulation of wealth for reinvestment. However, it is difficult to ignore the striking differences between the two; this is hardly surprising due to Marx’s economic approach whereas Weber takes a more sociological and cultural approach. However, it is crucial to not divide these theorists using clear-cut borders of the economic versus cultural approach or likewise, the macro structure-shaping society vs the micro action theory approach. What should be recognized, is that both theorists attempt to understand the connections between modern capitalism and specific historical circumstances.…

    • 826 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Marks argue for a radical break with capitalism not improving it. While Smith remains important in understanding the logic of liberalism and neoliberalism, Marks is perhaps more relevant today in understanding the historical shift from liberalism to neoliberalism which Smith did not tend to. What Marks understood was that history had one reoccurring pattern that of relations of domination across temporalities and while capitalism further facilitated and refined this process, socialism (and eventually communism) would confront this historical reoccurrence through worker control over the means of production. Marx believed that once the capitalist has set up the means of production, all value is created by the labor involved in producing whatever is being produced. In Marx 's view, presented in his 1867 tome Das Kapital (Capital), a capitalist 's profits come from exploiting labor, that i.e., from underpaying workers for the value that they are actually…

    • 1652 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Karl Marx presented Marxism as a way of understanding class divisions in the world that were based on the emphasis on materialism. Marx proposed a society without money or class divisions, diminishing the idea of materialism and capitalism, instead offering that equality in a society is based on how a society is run. Marx’s claims stemmed from an ideological perspective that individuals are more inclined to their wants instead of their needs, he offers that a society must work in a way where not just one individual but an entire society must give what they can to their state or government and take what they need not what they want. Doing this, Marx argues, will remove class conflict and monetary disparities. Marx idealized a utopia of equality for all, not just a certain few.…

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Marx and Weber are some of the most influential thinkers within sociology, their work helped to define and explain a phenomenon that was drastically altering the fabric of 18th and 19th century Europe, Capitalism. In trying to define what capitalism was both sociologists looked for an explanation in its origins, both seeing similar yet ultimately very radically different factors contributing to the origins of Capitalism in feudal Europe. Marx with his ‘scientific’ approach (which some argue only appears in his later works, for example Das Kapital), attempting to quantify the origins of capitalism with scientifically testable data (Marx really was the first to do this within the field of sociology), and Weber with his more psycho-analitical…

    • 1013 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Marxism in The Hunger Games If there is any perfect representation of Marxism in film it is in The Hunger Games. For this case study, I will be focusing on the first movie of the trilogy. This paper will overview the way Marxism is shown in The Hunger Games using a few examples from the movie. In this paper, I argue that The Hunger Games’ plot line has Marxism theories extremely exposed and almost blatantly exposed. Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels developed Marxism in the early 1900s.…

    • 753 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The teachings of Karl Marx and Marxism has always been my favorite theoretical perspective because it has been misunderstood over time. One of the best things about Marxism is that it stressed the importance of social equality and the issues that the system of capitalism created in society. Marx argued that capitalism was hindrance to freedom because only those who have money can really enjoy freedom. The Marxist theory in the simplest perspective is that “Marxism emphasizes the idea that social life is based upon "conflicts of interest".…

    • 958 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It divided into 5 volumes from the source of wealth, which means the physical labor, up to the method to increase labour’s productivity, which is the division of labour. Karl Marx (1818-1883), the founder of Marxism, was born in a turbulent society. His background had a huge effect on his extreme thoughts. First, as a Jewish, Marx and his family were living under an equity-constrained environment, and Marx’s father, whose easily-yield attitude toward the environment had leaded to a strong sense of anger in Karl Marx’s mind and made him living with an extreme characteristic and thoughts. Due to Industrial Revolution, Capitalism had developed rapidly and the contradictory of Capitalism was gradually exposed, for example the huge disparity between the rich and the poor, the labor received far less than they deserve and the rich kept becoming richer.…

    • 726 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays