Karl Marx And Max Weber: What Is The Purpose Of Government?

Superior Essays
What is the purpose of government? Is there an ideal organizational structure that a country could employ to ensure that a government serves its people to the best of its ability? Karl Marx and Max Weber, like others before and after them, both strove to help answer these questions. Although one could argue that we may never find a “perfect” system of government, both men presented new ways of thinking that continue to influence society today. Before one can begin analyzing the details of Marx’s and Weber’s works, it is important to address the question of the purpose of government. According to William Johnson (2014), a government should, among other things, work to provide economic growth, support those who are unable to support themselves, promote quality of life, promote the ability of individuals to succeed, and maintain a supply of essential resources. While many of these tasks today are supported by both the …show more content…
By being efficient, Weber felt that a government could promote economic growth and ensure a steady supply of resources, leading to a better overall quality of life for its citizens. The feelings of workers were not seen as an important factor in Weber’s works, and he felt that many factors, not just economic status, could contribute to a person’s class and quality of life. Social status or a person’s career, for example, could help an individual live a higher class life even if he or she had a more limited income (Fry and Raadschelders, 2014). Marx and Weber viewed government in different ways, and, although their viewpoints were different, both offered valuable contributions to the government and bureaucracy as we know them today. While we may never truly find the “best” way to run a government, the importance of striving to operate in the best way possible will always remain.
Works

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Marx, Karl. “After the Revolution.” In Princeton Readings in Political Thought. Edited by Mitchell Cohen and Nicole Fermon. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1996.…

    • 1317 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To understand how these types of different solutions developed, it is important to study each philosopher’s historical situation and the problems they observed. In this way a person can better compare the proposed solutions for similarities and differences. Karl Marx is considered to be the founder of the concept of socialism. Born in Prussia in 1818, his Jewish background exposed him to discrimination during his childhood that led him to question the role of religion in society (1). This…

    • 941 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In analyzing the written works of Jane Addams’ Democracy and Social Ethics and Karl Marx’s Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844 and The German Ideology, they portray how their theories can impact change within a society. While the basic structure and framework of society of society has remained consistent throughout, there are certain elements of society that are consistently subject to change. These authors address these changes as they pertain their theories to the functions of society. Through the written works of Jane Addams in Democracy and Social Ethics, she takes a particular focus on ethics in communities of society.…

    • 888 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Social class can be defined in different ways, but to put it into layman 's terms, someone 's social class is purely how much money they make per year, which directly correlates with the people group that each individual chooses to “hang around”. When you look at someone 's social class, you can break it up into a few different groups, which are music, entertainment, food, religion, and cultural values. When it comes to music, there are differences between two main categories of sound which are, the stereotypical rich person music, and the equipment that they use. The type of music that a stereotypical rich person would listen to would be classical music or even today 's hits, but the instrumental version of their music because they can…

    • 1220 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Human Nature Human beings have the capability of being quite despicable in situations involving monetary gain, power, or control. This is often associated with individuals in government or those of higher social status. In order to diminish such control over other individuals of less social or political power, Karl Marx and John Stuart Mill proposed their own stance on the influence government should have. Both individuals differ in their belief of individuality, liberty, freedom and self cultivation as forms that best define our human nature. Marx and Mill also differ in how such ideas are to be carried out.…

    • 911 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Karl Marx sought to abolish the belief system that preserved the uneven distribution of wealth and prolonged the suffering of the proletariat. As a result of the industrial revolution, the upper class exercised its power over the lower classes exclusively for the purpose of protecting self-interest. The labor of the lower classes not only supported their subsistence, but upheld the luxurious existence of the bourgeoisie as well. While the bourgeoisie retained control of the means of production, they entered an agreement with the proletariat to form “the rights of man,” which preserve the rights to life, liberty, and security with the limitation that one man’s rights should not undermine the rights of another. In his effort to outline the implications of “the rights of man,” Karl Marx presents a clear argument that the rights to life, liberty, and security ultimately preserve self-interest and detach man from civil society.…

    • 1744 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The period of industrialization influenced the three classical sociological theorists, Marx, Durkheim and Weber. Marx thought of industrialization in the most negative of ways compared to the other sociological theorists. With the rise of industrialization, the social classes changed to who was related to the mean of production, so the owners of the factories and machinery were called the bourgeois, who had more power than the proletariat, those working in the factories, creating the product. With this class distinction, Marx believed that it would lead to problems and conflict between the classes, because each class had their own interest, for instance, the bourgeoisie might be more interested in creating a product faster and cheaper, while…

    • 1399 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Sociological Theories

    • 1522 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Briefly contrast two theories of the ruling class covered in week 9. The two theories discussed were Marxist theory and Weber’s theory. Marxist theory consist of two main classes: the proletariat and bourgeois. Marxist theory explains how someone’s class is determined based on their role, either the worker or the capitalist.…

    • 1522 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Both Weber and Foucault conceptualised power and domination in different ways. Weber saw power in terms of authority that emanated and descended from above via powerful agents whereas Foucault saw power as an agentless horizontal force (Rudolph, 2006, p. 3). The differences between the three social theorists and their respected theories is that Marx focuses on economic power, particularly social and economic relationships and how it contributed to production. It was Marx’s belief that the ideal achievement of socialism led to equality and liberation. Weber contrasts to Marx by concentrating on status and rationalisation, believing that Marxism meant that the state had too much control and it potentially could lead to loss of freedoms for the individual.…

    • 1874 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Karl Marx, Emile Durkheim and Max Weber are three fundamental figureheads in the foundation of sociology who asserted that our lifestyles are products of the society in which we live. They all lived in a period of great social change, that of the Industrial Revolution, and based their writings and musings upon what they observed happening around them and extrapolated as to the condition of the future. One foundational product of contemporary societies, that truly came into existence at the time during which they were writing, would be the economy and economic life. Looking at it on a macro level perspective, it is one of the aspects of the social superstructure. It is a social institution by itself, but it also shares a give and take relationship with other institutions in society and the superstructure such as education, ethics, law, religion, etc.…

    • 1198 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In his view, principles of democracy are not realizable. He believed that the development of legal procedures which are meant to eliminate privilege would re-establish a new form of monopoly. For him, once a bureaucracy is established, it becomes an indestructible “escape proof.” (Weber 1922:989) Weber also mentioned the patronage system where jobs are not distributed on the basis of need or skills but loyalty instead.…

    • 740 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    9. Which do you think is more accurate the pluralist view or the majoritarian view? (Which can stop police brutality?) I think the pluralist view is more accurate when it comes to stopping police brutality. I think this because the pluralist view conveys that democracy comes from openness of the system to group interests, and competition, but not as a result of mass participation.…

    • 710 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    I’m sure that you have heard about the chaos enveloping us here in France. I know that rumors have been spreading about the demise of the upper and middle classes and that you must be worried about our safety. I should assure you that we are in no current danger from the revolutionaries here. In fact, I believe that if these revolutions are successful, they will continue to spread much-needed change against the nobility while eventually giving way to more moderate policies that will help us in the long term. If the revolutions in France and Germany succeed, economic liberalism and its proponents will eventually dominate Europe’s political and financial systems.…

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The most fundamental and important of these conflicts is that between the Bourgeoisie (those who own and control the means of production in society) and the Proletariat (those who simply sell their labor power in the market place of Capitalism)”. (Theories, 2009) One of the reasons that the philosophy of Karl Marx and Marxism is so misunderstood is the connection that society makes to…

    • 958 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Social stratification is everywhere, even in different forms of societies, such as capitalist, communist or mixed. Social stratification can be understood as a system that a society ranks categories of people in hierarchy. A person social class in based on births and achievements in life and an individual position within class structure shows social status. Social stratification is a society that ranks people and Marx and Weber both have different ways of how they view social stratification. This essay will look at both Marx view of social stratification which is bourgeoisie and proletariat and Weber view of social stratification which is class, standë/status, and party/power.…

    • 1667 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays