The Renaissance: Erasmus Vs. Luther

Great Essays
Erasmus vs Luther The Renaissance period beings in 1350 and that was the start of the “rebirth” in Italy, ending in 1550. During this period, people started hearing stories about the Black Death that happened in Europe and the wars and famine that was going on at the time. The men and women believed these were the devil works and they started questioning why God sent all this harm to people, so Christian leaders comforted people with good works such as, pilgrimages, relics, and indulgences, to make them feel closer to God. People took offense to the “good work” theology because they believed being a Christian should not just be from doing good works, but it should mean you have a personal relationship to God and you let your life reflect …show more content…
He had a sensitive soul and grew up in a less cosmopolitan environment than Erasmus. Luther was living as a Augustinian monk for more than fifteen years, (Wolf, 153). Luther was very smart and that advanced him faster than it would anybody else. He was ordained a priest and then five years later he became a Doctor in Theology, (Wolf, 154). Luther always felt as he was never good enough, no matter how hard he tried and no matter what he did, he always felt that God was mad at him. After reading Paul’s word, he had a conversion experience and he was convicted that people are saved by “faith alone’ and not by any good work or pious work, (Wolf, 154). Luther trusted in the scripture and that gave him courage and that alone, helped him walk the road of reformation. Luther wrote the Address to the German Nobility, and that challenged the authority of the Roman pope and the status of the clergy in general, (Wolf, 154). He also wrote The Babylonian Captivity of the Church, which stated that good works unjustified Scripture, (Wolfe 154). Luther wanted to cut out the middle men and allow people to establish a relationship with God directly. Also he believed that everyone should be able to read and study the Bible for …show more content…
He always felt two-sided about Luther and he always defended him, just not what he taught. Erasmus saw from the very beginning the dangers imminent in what he termed Luther 's immoderation. Erasmus did not like Luther’s whole sale attack against the churches authority and his strident language, (Wolfe, 155). Erasmus believed that “it is more advisable to scream out against those who abuse papal authority than against the popes themselves.” (Wolf,155). Erasmus made it well known that he had not read Luther and was not responsible for anything which Luther had written. Erasmus support of Luther came from their share of dislikes of abuses and the behavior of Luther’s peace was a necessity if Erasmus was to carry out his reforms in the church, but Luther was creating an upheaval in the church. Luther challenged the Roman officials with Scripture and they told him that he could not be right because they have power and tradition on their sides and his he does not recant they will kill him. Erasmus states that he does not want Luther killed because that is not what an example of Christ. In 1520, Erasmus met with Luther’s prince and he asked Erasmus’ advice on Luther. Erasmus wrote statement such as “the attack on Luther was caused by hatred of letters” and the “desire for supremacy, (Wolf, 156). He also wrote that “this affair” should be settled by a mature deliberation of serious and imperial men, (Wolf,

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Luther Movie Analysis

    • 1020 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In the Diet of Worms, Luther publically humiliated Charles V by calling out the Pope and the council by stating how they contradict themselves. In the hall, Luther refuses to recant his books, stating that they are helpful to understand the Christian faith and how they state the heresy the Popes – past and present – have committed. Although he states that he has written harshly on a few of his writings, Luther refuses to recant on the bases that the Church is wrong. Charles V main conflict with Luther is the conflicting views on religion and status. The emperor expects Luther to respect his authority and his upper-class status, especially since he was so close with the Church, and do as he’s told.…

    • 1020 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The things that the peasants did Luther didn’t want to happen at all, is because the church won’t change drives him to use other ways to against the church, which lead detection and chaos to Europe during the reformation. According to Luther he says “The Pope did and he made himself lord over the Church, proclaiming [the Church] at the same time a powerful mother, and empress over the Scriptures. This could not be tolerated.” (Luther’s Table Talk, 1535) All he wanted was to change the rules to Church. For the first evidence here, all the time Luther just want to change the Church from his own words, he didn’t want to bring chaos and distortion to Europe, from the quote he just angry about the Pope have all the things power and money. But he inspired the peasant revolt, which it is a fact he will never be able to change forever.…

    • 1427 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Unfortunately, it backfired greatly due to the lack of positive evidences and the many contradictory principles that could not be reconciled. Christianity simply could not be thought of scientifically, as the Church stated, God is all-powerful thus he cannot be confined to the laws of nature that we know of. The scientific context only served to highlight the flaws of Christianity, which skeptics immediately used to discredit the Christian community’s beliefs. To make-up for those flaws, the Church tried to erase the Devil, thus removing the contradiction of good and evil within God. However, by doing so, ecclesiastics had to build a complex argumentation to avoid mention the principle of the Devil and became lost in it, creating more confusion than clarification.…

    • 709 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    A man can reject morality because he sees no reason to obey its rules, the pope didn’t saw the reasons why thousands of people must sacrifice and to give up their lives, that supposedly one should not interfere in the doings of God, no one has the authority to put others’ lives to an end. As God he has a purpose of everything. The pope must really take his action if he put in his mind about what God’s gift must be treasured not to be…

    • 1614 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On page eleven, Martin mentions that they were always fighting a losing battle and that they had to learn the difference between both tolerance and acceptance. It is also mentioned more in depth about what the Christians thought about the Jews. They were “Christ-killers and God murders” and the blood libel was mentioned. A statement that Martin Smalls made which further supports Peter’s argument was when he said. “We were different; they didn’t understand our customs; we spoke languages they didn’t know; and their Church couldn’t control us” (Small, 16).…

    • 1020 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Martin Luther wrote a complaint to Pope Leo about this abuse and challenged all of the preachers to a debate over the theology of indulgences. This dispute was a contest between the two strong willed men and it largely ignored the theological objections. Pope Leo regarded the letter as a challenge…

    • 869 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    A member of the congregation of Soham was confronted by Fuller for his excessive drinking and the gentlemen replied that he was unable to control himself therefore he should not be held accountable for his actions. This excuse did not sit well with Fuller and he consulted Eve concerning the matter. Arthur Kirby notes, “Mr. Eve said that the man was able to keep himself from open sins, though he had no power to do things spiritually good. As far as outward acts were concerned, man had power both to obey the will of God and to disobey it.” The congregation at Soham rightly disciplined the gentleman by excluding him from membership; however, the theological debate that followed would cause great division in the church.…

    • 1367 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Many saw the issues that were occuring in the church between clerics marrying, having mistresses, and taking on responsibilities that caused them to not focus on the church. In Document A, Desiderius Erasmus depicts the exclusion of Pope Julius II from Heaven. In the depiction, Julius II is trying to enter Heaven, but his key won 't open the gate. When his guardian angel asks him why he only brought his key of power, and not his key of knowledge, Julius answers saying that he has never needed to use the key of knowledge, only power, and that he found it useless. This depiction by Erasmus shows another common problem within the church, which was that those within it solved their problems with power and force, instead of with knowlege and God.…

    • 1091 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Romans saw the Christians as paria that would infect their way of life, and the Christians rejected all Roman ways of thinking so extremely, that they wouldn’t even associate on an intellectual level. It is devastating knowing that people were killed over something that was simple a matter of opinion. People were, and still are today, so willing to shut others out because they think differently than you. Ultimately though, I believe there are many lessons learned from this time, that have shaped many ways of thinking within the Christian faith as far as controversy. That different is ok and respecting those differences is essential to…

    • 728 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Martin saw this as a disgrace and a complete violation of the idea of confession and penance. This was a serious offense to justice and salvation. Based on Luther’s understanding of the scriptures, forgiveness could not and should not be bought, but rather was a free gift of God’s own everlasting mercy to his sinful children. Luther then looked to open the debate by nailing a copy of the “Ninety-Five Theses” to the door of Wittenberg Castle Church. It was an open invitation to have a open public debate on the issues discussed in the theses.…

    • 808 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays