Also a political concept, equality of outcome is often described in contrast to equality of opportunity. It is the political ideology that people all have the same amount of wealth in goods or their economic standpoints are similar. To achieve this, a transfer of wealth is needed to eliminate the inequality in society, giving from the rich to the poor. Equality is seen as the most desirable state that society could be in. …show more content…
He instead focused on more concrete issues. The productive forces in society are what shaped Marx’s ideas about equality. Socialism is based on the idea of distribution in society where what individuals put into society they should get out. This is again in opposition to equality as this practice completely rules it out. Equality of opportunity and outcome are liberal ideas. Neoliberalists might view equality of opportunity as a good thing because the two ideas seem to work together, by taking the competitiveness in society and making it attainable for everyone. In contrast to this equality of outcome is not looked at so favourably from this perspective as neoliberalists don’t want equal wealth between everyone, instead privatized companies and a laissez-faire environment for