Similarities Between Karl Marx And John Rawls

Improved Essays
John Rawls and Karl Marx both see equality as an important value in human society; indeed, they both see it as something people are entitled to and as the foundation upon which the ideal society is built. However, they diverge drastically in how they conceptualize the way an egalitarian society would operate and how they believe such a society could be achieved. Concerning the former, Marx envisioned a communist utopia, whereas Rawls was a strong believer in liberal democracy. In terms of the latter, Marx was a staunch believer in proletarian revolution, while Rawls believed in perfecting the existing system through democratic reforms. Their contrasting visions stem partly from the different periods in which they wrote. Karl Marx formulated …show more content…
Marx explicitly denies the idea that a truly egalitarian society can be achieved through a system of equal right to anything. As Marx says, “This equal right is an unequal right to unequal labor” (Marx, 232). Because some people may be willing and able to do more labor than others, those people would be entitled to more than others; in other words, the system still produces inequality. Marx posits that true communism can only be achieved when “labor is no longer just a means of keeping alive but has itself become a vital need; when the all-around development of individuals has also increased their productive powers and all the springs of cooperative wealth flow more abundantly” (Marx, 233) Once this happy state of things is achieved, people will simply contribute all the labor that they can (because it’s a “vital need”) and the society will duly distribute to them according to their needs. Moreover for Marx the only way of achieving this sort of egalitarianism is by the workers seizing the means of production. A just society cannot be actually achieved purely by fiddling with how goods are distributed. As Marx sees it, the distribution is “a feature of the mode of production itself” (Marx,

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Many philosophical scholars believe that justice, liberty, law, and equality are an important aspect among the commonwealth of the nation. Moreover, this paper will focus on the two important political philosophers that argue with the notion and importance of equality and justice in the western society. These philosophers include: Robert Nozick and John Rawls. John Rawls claims that equality and justice is derived from an equal distribution of opportunities, income, wealth, for the general social advantage of the citizen, which includes welfare. Whereas, Robert Nozick defines equality and justice as an entailment to oneself.…

    • 320 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Consequently, the Marxist solution for distributive justice is the abolition of private property. Wei then analyzes the writing of Rawls and Nozick to show that their positions are actually similar. Nozick and Rawls both agree that private ownership is a natural result of the Marxist principle of “reward according to effort and ability.” The difference between Rawls and Nozick is that Rawls seeks to improve Marx principle of justice by having it operate through “justice as fairness.”…

    • 1317 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout history, many different types of social and economic theories have developed as a direct response to the problems a given philosopher observed in society. With this in mind, it is interesting to analyze is how two different people can observe similar problems within society and develop different solutions. For example, in the 19th century Karl Marx identified many problems within his society and developed his socialist theories to address these issues. On the other hand, Scottish author and government reformer Samuel Smiles saw similar problems and developed different solutions. His solutions helped Samuels become a recognized “zealous advocate of material progress based on individual enterprise and free trade” (2).…

    • 941 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Karl Marx, John Rawls, and Robert Nozick are three prominent philosophers whose political theories have an important place in the modern political debate about the role of the state, how society should be structured and the concept of justice. Karl Marx was born 1818, his major work was The Communist Manifesto published in 1848. Marx advocated for a type of socialism called communism where the dominant goals are the abolition of private property and class antagonisms through a revolution of the proletariat or working class. John Rawls was born in 1921, his major work was A Theory of Justice published in 1971. Rawl’s defended social liberalism, egalitarianism, and the welfare state in the form of distributive justice.…

    • 1636 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Marxism The Crucible

    • 1524 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Imagine living in a world where no human oppresses another. Imagine living in a world where no one is poor and no one is rich. Imagine living in a world where the social class system is non-existent. Karl Marx, a 19th century philosopher, foresaw the image of this apparent communist utopia forming in every society; he expected the maltreated working classes to fight back against those who have immense, misused power. He believed that material possessions have a powerful enough influence on our lives to be considered the sole reason of historical change.…

    • 1524 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The 19th century was a period of revelation. The enlightenment in the late 18th and early 19th century started a domino effect of different ideologies that challenged the conservative order that was currently in place. Society and culture was bound to be rewrote. Heading into the 19th century, the world and ideologies that came with it shifted. Liberalism, Feminism, and Marxism are all different ideologies that dominated society during the 19th century.…

    • 493 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Emile Durkheim’s book The Division of Labor in Society, there is a passage, on page 312, in which he writes about the division of labor, solidarity, and spontaneity. I will break down what these three terms means to him and what he was trying to convey to his audience, at the time. Durkheim believed that solidarity is what made a healthy, organic society. An organic society, to him, was one where there was still inequality, but more specifically, natural inequality. He saw there being two kinds of inequalities.…

    • 1008 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In The Communist Manifesto, Marx and Engels called for a worldwide worker’s revolution, whose main goal was to overthrow capitalism and establish a new society in which all property would be publicly owned (Mason 67). Their radical ideas challenged the capitalist structure and called for full equality. Class conflict and the struggle of the proletariat are at the core of Marxist ideology. Marx and Engels criticized materialism and the dynamic between the dominant class (the bourgeoisie) and the subordinate class (the proletariat). They theorized that the conflict between these classes would erupt into inevitable revolution, in which the proletariat would overthrow the dominant class and establish a new classless, egalitarian society (Mason 70).…

    • 1158 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Based off his own views of fairness and justice, Rawls would consider Rousseau’s ideal society fair. This conclusion is only made when considering what is at the core of Rawls’ desire for fairness: justice. Rousseau’s emphasis on security is of little concern to Rawls. However, Rousseau’s belief of liberties and equality follow Rawls’ own belief of fairness as justice. For Rawls, a practice is fair when none of those participating in it feel they are not only being compelled to give in to illegitimate claims, but also feeling they are being taken advantage of.…

    • 1251 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    John Rawls theory of social justice developed over time with the publishing of various books he wrote, such as A Theory of Justice and Political Liberalism. In A Theory of Justice, he determines the “Circumstances of Justice.” These circumstances assume justice applies to a “definite geographical territory and that the subjects of justice are “roughly similar in…

    • 1320 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Thomas Hobbes, John Locke and Karl Marx were three opposing philosophers during the Enlightenment with their own interpretations on government and people. Hobbes believed society needed an absolute monarchy, “to confer all their power and strength upon one man.” Locke said that human nature had natural rights, and were therefore “not to be under the will or legislative authority of man.” Finally, Marx believed in communism, in which belongings are public. All of the philosophies had their own relation to the social contract, which was introduced by Jean Jacques Rousseau.…

    • 909 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Karl Marx presented Marxism as a way of understanding class divisions in the world that were based on the emphasis on materialism. Marx proposed a society without money or class divisions, diminishing the idea of materialism and capitalism, instead offering that equality in a society is based on how a society is run. Marx’s claims stemmed from an ideological perspective that individuals are more inclined to their wants instead of their needs, he offers that a society must work in a way where not just one individual but an entire society must give what they can to their state or government and take what they need not what they want. Doing this, Marx argues, will remove class conflict and monetary disparities. Marx idealized a utopia of equality for all, not just a certain few.…

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    It would not be advantageous to us or to anyone if we exploited consumers, therefore, Marx’s proposed regulation and redistribution is ridiculous and would never work as a viable system in the real…

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Earth is currently facing detrimental environmental issues. These issues have been evident for decades; however, many people have continuously denied them to be problematic or even their existence entirely. While these critics have managed to get away with the rejection of these problems for many years, it is no longer deniable that the issue of environmental degradation is very real and in need of immediate action. Much of the population has come to understand this, and have executed a variety of modest attempts to increase environmental sustainability. However, these efforts have demonstrated to be of minimal effect in solving the large-scale issues directly causing the degradation.…

    • 1550 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1. Karl Marx explains social inequalities through a society being stratified along economic lines and social class being defined solely on economic position. According to Marx, a person’s economic position is their relationship to means of production, which defines social class. Based on an industrial society, he defined social class by two classes; the capitalist class (Bourgeoisie) and the working class (Proletariat). Marx felt strongly against capitalism and believed that everyone should have a communistic society, which would have no surpluses so only what is needed by the people would be produced.…

    • 1248 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays