The Magyar People: A Comparative Analysis

Great Essays
In the latter half of the ninth century AD, a tribal confederation from the Asian steppes began a migration into eastern and central Europe. Initially staying on the fringes of Christendom, these peoples soon came head-to-head with the established power of central Europe, the kingdom of the Eastern Franks. In the opening years of the conflict, the Magyars, as they were known (later known as the Hungarians) created a crisis which threatened the survival of the Eastern Frankish kingdom. The magnitude of the Magyar threat the kingdom and Europe as a whole has largely been neglected by modern scholarship. The struggle between the Eastern Franks and the Hungarians can be compared to the Moorish invasion of Iberia in terms of what was at stake; the dismantlement of European civilization. …show more content…
In order to provide a comprehensive analysis, it is imperative to investigate the crisis not solely through a military lens, which is what has generally prevailed in modern scholarship. An examination of the Magyar peoples and their social structures will allow us to draw a stark contrast between them and the civilization of the Eastern Franks. A comprehension of the Hungarians’ military tactics will be used to illustrate their capacity for war. Finally, the policies which the Ottonian dynasty enacted under the reign of Henry I and Otto I will exhibit the monumental effort which Frankish society had to collectively implement in order to survive. Collectively, these factors will demonstrate that the Magyars were the most destructive force to European civilization since the Huns and until the

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The Sleepwalkers Summary

    • 780 Words
    • 4 Pages

    She likewise examines the origins of the Great War but assumes a different approach. By specifically looking at individual pre-war events, she assesses when war became more likely than peace. She sees the war to be a result of strategies malfunctioning, for example, Belgium fending off the Germans. She also distinguishes the roles of individuals who had the power to start or end the war and the pressures that made them commit to their decisions. The historian uses the attacks on Louvain to highlight the senseless destruction of culture from the war, which was inconvenient to all parties as a result of their interlinking economies.…

    • 780 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    By practicing militarism, Germany fostered an environment of mutual distrust and intense rivalry in Europe. Countries like Great Britain and Russia felt compelled to increase the size and training of their armies and navies so that Germany, or any other militaristic country, could not easily overpower them. In addition, German militarism led to a focus on conflict that made many Europeans anticipate war. By holding armies of a million or more men and strategizing heavily for combat, countries, such as Germany, Great…

    • 1465 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Therefore, if we want to prevent war, leaders should know what is war and inquiry what causes it, why and how war conducted in order to bring solution for nation by eliminating it cause. Moreover, we obviously need theories and principles of war to enhance our judgment of the essence of war and evaluate their current application. Through comprehensive assessment of different theories, we reflect on great intellectuals and fundamental definition of war, on history of great wars, and find how theories work.…

    • 1718 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Nationalism became the leading force in the certification of the German identity, and the newly created German superpower wanted to look for “their place in the sun”. Nationalistic ideologies and national self-interest became the reason this large scale war broke out and tore away at Europe. Their decision to go into a “irrational” war was largely based on their “rational calculations” and national interest, and the armistice that lead to the Treaty of Versailles would prove that national interest is always in the mind of nations when they go into war, and when they end the war. At the time, Germany was allied with Austria-Hungary and the Ottoman Empire, while the source of the…

    • 1470 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    His rude, patronizing language and offensive comments, definitely contributed to rising tensions between Germany and great political powers; Britain. The event of which he played most significance in throughout his lifetime was his influence on the initiation of WW1. His incompetence to lead, was reinforced through the support he provided Austria-Hungary on their attack of Serbia. Kaiser was well aware of his military’s strength, According to historian Langer et al ‘he believed in force’. This fuelled a European arms race, whereby nations invested in new weapons and emerging technology to gain imperial possessions.…

    • 991 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If there’s one thing Europe and the rest of the world learned from World War I, it is that massive, complicated alliances will only create a huge blown out war that may completely annihilate entire countries to start over from the ground up. These days, complicated allies are not as prominent, but the ways of communication, understanding, and basic diplomatic interactions are. The U.S. struggles to find its rightful place is the affairs of foreign countries without tying themselves to closely and potentially putting themselves in danger on the homeland. Diplomatic interactions and communications will continue to be very important as more terrorist groups emerge in the middle east and take over, and it will be interesting to see how future leaders (including and especially the U.S.) will respond and worth with other countries to promote peace and…

    • 841 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Is this the real definition of war? I do not agree! I believe his experience went beyond the psychological tolerance of violence, hence as a defense, he is trying to make sense of so much horror. I do agree with Hedges that war eviscerates the worse and the best of human beings from cowardly to heroism. Hedges defines the wars and ethnic conflicts of our times as “manufactured” (The Myth of War, pdf.…

    • 823 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Contrasting World War I versus. World War II History is the past, and it’s important to reflect on the past, to help ensure that as a society we don’t repeat mistakes. At the time of both World War I and World War II, each became the largest war in history up until that point. Each war shared tremendous amounts of death, and the involvement of many countries, so it’s crucial to analyze the causes and the factors of each war to truly see the nature of the circumstances revolving both wars. Both World War I and World War II share many different aspects, but at the same time, they each to their own hold unique characteristics.…

    • 1610 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Fascist governments, even fascist-leaning ones, are subject to European Union sanction as seen with the Freedom Party in Austria (Bell 245). These governments existence is key to defining modern Europe as the surviving institutions spent so much on combatting them. The Nazis razed Europe to the ground and it had to be rebuilt. The Soviets left Eastern Europe stuck behind the West technologically and economically, wounds which have yet to be healed. The Revolutions of 1848 achieved no lasting reforms, and the same could be argued about the Revolutions of the 20th century as those nations have since dissolved, but the Russian and Fascist Revolutions caused nearly unimaginable destruction.…

    • 1507 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although the Crusades illustrated a new spirit of adventure among European kings, princes, and knights, when analyzed in their entirety, the Crusades were hardly a total success. If anything, the Crusades hardened the sense of "holy war" between the Christian west and Islamic east. The political, economic, and military institution known as feudalism slowly developed in the High Middle Ages as an attempt to bring some order to the politically fragmented world of medieval Europe. At the same time, new national monarchies emerged in England, France, Germany, and Spain; they owed their success to citizen participation and loyalty. One could make the bold claim that perhaps the modern nation-state was born during the High Middle…

    • 317 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays