Change is going against the way people live and how society acts. Change is created through three different aspects time, violence, and democracy. These changes can form into being good for society or they can have it turn for the worst. Adolf Hitler indicates that, “All great movement are popular movements”; that no movement is hated by the people, they are only loved and embraced. Martin Luther would disagree with the idea. His movements were unpopular to most of Europe at the beginning of his life. Movements of society always have opposition. These changes are created by “human passions and emotion”. Writer perspective is that in every movement is made by people realizing the things wrong or the things needed through their own emotions and
…show more content…
Locke, Montesquieu, and Rousseau’s written words stirred the people into having the ability to thinking for themselves. The people needed a way to change the way they were living. The representative went to french government. They were kicked out of government. This created a set back of showing and proving to monarchy they were in need. The overcame the obstacle by creating the tennis court oath as way of continuing to talk about the changes they needed. It was not only the third estate who needed change there were people of the first and second estate who wanted to changed some rules of society. The people wanted to have rights; their needs came with opposition. Rousseau used his words to try and sway the monarchy to change it’s ways. He used his words to empower the people, to give them new ideas, and to give them hope for a new way of life. The were enflamed by the words or writers such as Marat, Rousseau, and Dontan. The found their voice in these men and took over france through the injustice of the monarchy. In the movement of freedom there were some obstacle in the way. People used words and emotions to get what they wanted but, their emotions set them back from creating a peaceful solution. France took a turn of rage and violence. Parliament was corrupt with their words filled with emotion. Words guided the people to having their own republic of france, it also fed onto their emotions creating the setback of violence before peace could be
Locke, Montesquieu, and Rousseau’s written words stirred the people into having the ability to thinking for themselves. The people needed a way to change the way they were living. The representative went to french government. They were kicked out of government. This created a set back of showing and proving to monarchy they were in need. The overcame the obstacle by creating the tennis court oath as way of continuing to talk about the changes they needed. It was not only the third estate who needed change there were people of the first and second estate who wanted to changed some rules of society. The people wanted to have rights; their needs came with opposition. Rousseau used his words to try and sway the monarchy to change it’s ways. He used his words to empower the people, to give them new ideas, and to give them hope for a new way of life. The were enflamed by the words or writers such as Marat, Rousseau, and Dontan. The found their voice in these men and took over france through the injustice of the monarchy. In the movement of freedom there were some obstacle in the way. People used words and emotions to get what they wanted but, their emotions set them back from creating a peaceful solution. France took a turn of rage and violence. Parliament was corrupt with their words filled with emotion. Words guided the people to having their own republic of france, it also fed onto their emotions creating the setback of violence before peace could be