A Literary Analysis Of The Necklace By Mme Loisel

Improved Essays
The Necklace

In my literary analysis of the Neckless the Author presents a women who was born into a life of mediocracy but longed for an existence of privilege and prestige. Mme. Loisel is described as even though pretty and charming had nothing of monetary means that made her look effluent in the eyes of upper class. In paragraphs one through four she describes her failure to measure up to what her expectations are of the rich and famous. She wishes to be adored by distinguished gentlemen but because of the fact that she has nothing to offer materialistically she herself is somehow of lesser value and was forced to settle for her husband a menial clerk for the Department of Education. The author goes into great detail of the constant
…show more content…
Now satisfied that she looks the part, she attends the party forgetting for just a moment that she truly thought she did not belong. After the party she realizes that she has lost her friends diamond necklace and searches for it to no avail. Mme. Loisel lies to her friend by saying the clasp was being repaired giving her some time to gather up the funds to replace the necklace. Her and her husband took out loans, cut corners and let their house keeper go all in an effort to replace the “expensive” piece. They accomplished buying another extravagantly priced necklace resembling the one that was lost but in doing so Mme Loisel began to learn what true suffering was like. She had to work for the next ten years slaving away to pay back the money from the loans, sacrificing all the comforts she before took for granite. Her hard life took a tool on her beauty and youthfulness. She now looked so hangered even her rich friend she borrowed the necklace from didn’t even recognize her on the street. Mme. Loisel decided to tell her rich friend what had happened and with a sickening twist of fate in lies the moral of the story, things are not always as they seem. Her friend explains that the necklace was not even real jewels and by Mme. Loisel assuming that just because her friend had money everything she had was of the greatest of

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    When Maupassant explains that Madame Loisel, “came to know the ghastly life of abject poverty”(4), he is saying that Madame Loisel worked hard to earn money to pay back the debt for the necklace for ten years. This lifestyle changed her appearance. When Maupassant states that Madame Loisel “looked old now. Her hair was badly done, her skirts were awry, her hands were red”(4), he is demonstrating that the necklace was supposed to make Madame look wealthy and beautiful, but instead, losing it lead to her poverty and she doesn’t look as beautiful as she did at the ball. Madame Loisel lived a lower class lifestyle for ten years, which lead to her change in appearance, just to learn that the necklace was fake. When Madame Loisel tells her friend, Madame Forestier, what happened, Madame Forestier says, “Oh, my poor Mathilde! But mine was imitation. It was worth at the very most five hundred francs”(Maupassant 5), showing that Madame Loisel worked for ten years just for a fake necklace. By using irony, Maupassant shows how being unhappy with the good things in your life can have harmful consequences.…

    • 515 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The lady in the story thought she deserved more than she had. Her husband got her a ticket to a fancy ball, she said she didn't want to go at first, then her husband told her he would find some money and give it to her, so she can find the perfect dress. She finds the dress, but wants a necklace so she asks her friend if she can borrow the “diamond” necklace, she agrees. So, she comes home and realised the necklace is gone. She freaks out and goes to find it. She can’t find it, but she doesn’t tell her friend that she lost her “diamond necklace, so she saves up money, moves into her house's attic, sells her house out and buys her friend a new diamond necklace but her friend tells her the necklace was fake , so she went into debt for 10 years for…

    • 511 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Madame Loisel was disappointed she could not get luxuries like her friends had, that she had to settle for a “civil servant at the ministry of education”(333). Though she thought she deserved better than a simple life, that she should be able to have anything in her life because she was “beautiful.” Also when her husband came home with news of her being able to go to a ball she said she had nothing to wear and when they finally got a dress for her to wear she complained about having no jewelry. She was forced to ask a friend to borrow a “superb diamond necklace”(336) She didn't just accept the fact that she got to go to a ball and be happy about it she was angry because she had nothing to wear even though she had a dress that would sify the party. In addition, after the party she noticed she had lost the necklace, so she had to buy a replacement for her fiend so her friend wouldn't know that she had lost it. “After 10 years they made good of everything including the various rates and compound interests” after she worked for something that she bought she felt good, she was humbled because she never had to work for anything because her husband would buy her whatever she wanted(340). She was…

    • 870 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The main character Mme. Loisel in the short story “The Necklace” written by Guy de Maupassant is dishonest and jealous. First off, Mme. Loisel is a dishonest lady. One evening when she went out with a borrowed necklace, she lost it and did not say a thing to Mme. Forestier (her friend) until she replaced it. On page 32 Mme. Loisels husband writes," Mme. Loisel decides to replace the necklace by saying we must take the steps to replace the piece of jewelry." Instead of being honest about it she replaces it without telling her friend until she bought the new one. The second reason Mme. Loisel is dishonest, is she did not say she lost it until it was paid off. She said, "I bought you another one just like it, And we've been paying it off for…

    • 296 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    She stand on top of her husband in every way possible, making herself look pitiful and small. But in truth, her delicate features hid her overwhelming pride. When an invitation to a grand ball came, Mathilde sobbed uncontrollably. Her pride made Mathilde troubled by her lack of elegant dresses and jewelries. She disliked the thought of being inferior, surrounded by well-groomed ladies. Being sympathetic, her husband threw his savings on the table, assuring her that she will get her dress. However, Mathilde was still not satisfied. “I’m utterly miserable at not having any jewels, not a single stone, to wear,” she said. Fortunately, Mathilde had a wealthy friend, so she is able to obtain what she had imagined. Arriving at the ball, Mathilde was envied. While having such a wonderful time, it was known later that the borrowed diamond was missing. The Loisels were flabbergasted, searching everywhere. Because of Mathilde’s pride, she refused to confess to her friend, fearing being scolded…

    • 551 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Loisel's Tragic Flaws

    • 897 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Loisel is a tragic hero, due to her hubris; which engenders her downfall. She ended up paying 10 years of debt because of her selfish attitude and her desire for more. She paid the price of being immature and arrogant. She was a jealous and greedy woman that brought gloom upon herself and her husband. Her behavior throughout,The Necklace, would be considered careless and reckless. From the beginning she considered her birth,“an error of destiny”(Maupassant 7 ). A woman who had to settle down with a minor clerk rather than a rich and handsome man. She dreams of the unruliest dreams that can’t be granted. Her hubris has doomed her in search of her dream to be wealthy. As a result, she is stuck paying the price for one night of satisfaction for 10 years. Ms. Loisel fails to realize this which, engendered her suffering and…

    • 897 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In the short story The Necklace, by Guy de Maupassant uses the literary device irony, to develop the theme which is to be honest with your friends, not to lie to them. The theme developed by irony is when Madame Loisel tried to replace the “fake necklace” with a “real diamond necklace” that she had lost during the party for “10 years of her life”(Maupassant 7,8). The fact that Madame Loisel went the extra and useless mile to try and replace the necklace, instead of just confessing to her friend she wasted years of her life to repay something she didn’t need to. Trying to cover up her tracks made her poor and miserable when she had a perfectly normal and average life, her need for more expensive things led her to the life of poverty.…

    • 238 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Necklace, also contains a good moral, the moral of the story was to not let pride get in the way of telling the truth. If the woman hadn’t been so ungrateful and told the truth to the lady who owned the necklace, then the poor woman wouldn’t be super poor. “What I gave back to you was another one just like it. And it took us ten years to pay for it. You can imagine it wasn’t easy for us, since we were quite poor...Anyway, I’m glad it’s over and done with.” She would have helped herself out and her husband if she would’ve told the truth. Mathilde Loisel let pride get in the way of telling the truth, she wanted to be seen as an equal, or above that, being the pretty spoiled lady she imagined herself to be. The ending of the book about the necklace’s actual value turns out to be an actual message. The author included the ending to show that the poor lady didn’t have to work so hard; it teaches her valuable lessons on working hard in life. After working so hard over the years Mathilde Loisel, who once was beautiful had aged greatly. The long working days had taught her something over the years; to not be ungrateful for what you have. The Necklace was another good example of pride getting in the way of truth, the lady was too late to realize that until 10 years after the…

    • 883 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Symbolism In The Necklace

    • 1356 Words
    • 6 Pages

    "He gives his wife the four hundred francs that he had set aside for a gun so that she can buy a dress" (" 'The Necklace '" 168). Money is a symbol in this short story. It shows how generous Madame Loisel 's husband is when he tries to please his wife. Money also causes many conflicts at the end of the story when they spend many years paying back the necklace. Monsieur Loisel shows a great amount of generosity. He spends his early mornings looking for the missing necklace, gave his wife tickets to the party, and used his saved money to make his wife happy. He is aware that his wife is insatiable when it comes to material items so he is generous with his money to try to solve their problems. Monsieur also takes out many loans and all of his life savings in order to pay for a new…

    • 1356 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Necklace Thesis

    • 1082 Words
    • 5 Pages

    “Things come apart so easily when they have been held together with lies.”(Dorothy Allison). This quote is perfect for the short story “The Necklace”. Had Mathilde Loisel a beautiful woman who dreams of a richer life seen this quote the story would have ended differently. The second she refuses to tell Jeanne a rich woman and friend of Mathilde what actually happened her life would not have came apart so easily. We see going through the story that Mathilde lying keeps leading her to the wrong path. Mathilde lying ruined her life and caused great pain to her and her husband Monsieur who is a hard working clerks who tries his best to make his wife happy. In the story “The Necklace” by Guy de Maupassan shows us why lying is not the right thing…

    • 1082 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Forrester. Knowing that the necklace was all paid off, she saw no harm in telling Mrs. Forrester what had happened. With much surprise, Mrs. Forrester laughed and said that her necklace was only costume jewelry. This means that Mathilde gave up everything she had in order to pay off something that never existed. It was an allusion just like the entire life would be. The author themes this story very well, he told about a woman who wanted what she could never have, never realizing that what she wanted was not real happiness it was a costume people put on for show. Happiness comes from within. Mathilde never appreciated what she had, until she lost…

    • 658 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Her selfish ways prevent her from enjoying her relationships with her husband and her friend. Visiting her friend of a higher class was a reminder of what she did not have and she always left her rich friend’s home holding hands with a green-eyed monster, only returning home to weep. (Maupassant 6). Before needing to borrow jewels, she had stopped going to see her Madame Forester completely because of her self-pity. This gives us the impression that Madame Loisel is not as concerned with her friend and their friendship as she is with what personal profit or pleasure she receives from the relationship. Madame Loisel’s churlish reaction when her husband presents the invitation additionally shows how self-absorbed she is. She cries, focusing only upon her lack of something to wear. She gives no consideration to the way this will make her husband feel. “He was disconsolate” (Maupassant 22). She is unconcerned with her dejected husband and in fact, seems to deviously manipulate him to further her avaricious agenda; a new dress. Moreover, she has no regard for what her husband may be giving up in order to be able to purchase the dress. Monsieur Loisel places her happiness above his own and does not tell her of his sacrificed shooting trip (Maupassant 27) His generosity and kindness only further highlight how selfish Madame Loisel really is. When the necklace is lost, it is her husband who spends the evening until early morning out searching, going to the police and newspapers while she stays at home “overwhelmed, on a chair, without a fire, without a thought” (Maupassant 79). She gives no thought to her husbands lost sleep and stress while she lounges, waiting. Then, when it is decided that they must replace the necklace, Monsieur Loisel handles the situation magnanimously. He gives up his inheritance and takes out loans not knowing if he will be able to repay them (Maupassant 93). If she…

    • 964 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Greediness and lack of appreciation can cause a person to lose what is most important. “The Necklace” by Guy de Maupassant, is a short story about a woman, Mathilde Loisel, who wants more than she has, and because of this she ends up in a state which was worse than beforehand. “Everyday Use” by Alice Walker, is about a woman, Dee, who visits her family and tries to take a quilt that would look good hanging in her home, but the quilt was promised to her younger sibling, Maggie. Both short stories are similar, but also have different aspects. Each story has a woman who is greedy, these women also take what they have for granted, and each story has sacrifices that were made for the benefit of these women.…

    • 1380 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It 's important to realize that certain people might have thought Madame Forestier would be furious while others probably believed the story would conclude with the friends just catching up. However, Maupassant does what others wouldn 't think to do and he uses irony to help the theme surface. The theme is exposed at the end when it is learned that the necklace is fraudulent. “‘Oh, my poor, poor Mathilde! Mine was false. It was worth five hundred francs at the most!’’’ (Maupassant 615) This changes everything because before it was thought that she had to work to pay off the debt, when in reality those ten years of hard labor were unnecessary. The ten years were caused by her since she lost the necklace and hadn 't confronted Madame Forestier about it in the first place. It is acknowledged that although the necklace is marvelous and expensive-looking, the necklace is worth way less. Another aspect of irony in the story is that although the necklace was supposed to make her look more stunning, because of it, she lost her attractiveness. Madame Loisel ends up losing her looks due to hard labor. “‘Oh! Oh, my poor Mathilde, how you’ve changed!’” (Maupassant 615) It is ironic that Madame Loisel tries to look well-off using the necklace, but ends up losing all of her money because of the necklace. The irony in the story makes it more amusing and unforeseen in the…

    • 1019 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Similar to ‘An Unknown Girl’, the story begins with the protagonist deeply unhappy with her station in life, feeling as if she deserved to belong to a different class. There is a series of events building up to when the persona feels most accepted at the reception of the Ministry of Education. However, unlike a poem, this short story has a clear climax: when Madame Loisel loses the necklace. Thus ensued her spiralling descent into poverty, and her ultimate acceptance of belonging to a lower middle-class family. Dialogue is also used tellingly to convey the central protagonist’s wish to belong to a higher class. During an anxious conversation, Madame Loisel declares, “I’ll look like a church mouse. I’d almost as soon not go to the reception.” She is afraid to humiliate herself and gain the lesser opinion of the higher classes that she wants to belong to. It is also used to contrast the different feelings of belonging between Madame Loisel and her husband. Whilst Loisel felt she deserved to belong to a society with “elegant dinners [and] gleaming silverware”, her husband shows his contentment with his mediocre life, declaring that he liked “nothing…better than a nice…

    • 2235 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays