Liebeck V. Mcdonalds Case Study

Improved Essays
I think the hot drink purchase from restaurant could quickly give me third degree of burns and I would agree with the case of Liebeck case.Meawhile here are the brief history of liebeck and how the incidence happen to her that cause her bodily injury and how her manages to took her to court for damages.
Liebeck v. McDonald's Restaurants
Full case name Stella Liebeck v. McDonald's Restaurants, P.T.S., Inc. and McDonald's International, Inc. Decided August 18, 1994 Citation(s) 1994 Extra LEXIS 23 (Bernalillo County, N.M. Dist. Ct. 1994), 1995 WL 360309 (Bernalillo County, N.M. Dist. Ct. 1994), Court membership Judge(s) sitting Robert H. Scott
Liebeck v. McDonald's Restaurants, [1] also known as the McDonald's coffee case and the hot coffee lawsuit,
…show more content…
Liebeck was in the passenger's seat of her grandson's 1989 Ford Probe, which did not have cup holders, and her grandson Chris parked the car so that Liebeck could add cream and sugar to her coffee. Liebeck placed the coffee cup between her knees and pulled the far side of the lid toward her to remove it. In the process, she spilled the entire cup of coffee on her lap. [9] Liebeck was wearing cotton sweatpants; they absorbed the coffee and held it against her skin, scalding her thighs, buttocks, and groin. …show more content…
[11] She remained in the hospital for eight days while she underwent skin grafting. During this period, Liebeck lost 20 pounds (9 kg, nearly 20% of her body weight), reducing her to 83 pounds (38 kg). Liebeck suffered permanent disfigurement after the incident and was partially disabled for up to two years afterwards. [12][13]
Pre-trial
Liebeck sought to settle with McDonald's for $20,000 to cover her actual and anticipated expenses. Her past medical expenses were $10,500; her anticipated future medical expenses were approximately $2,500; and her loss of income was approximately $5,000 for a total of approximately $18,000. [14]
Instead, the company offered only $800. When McDonald's refused to raise its offer, Liebeck retained Texas attorney Reed Morgan. Morgan filed suit in New Mexico District Court accusing McDonald's of "gross negligence" for selling coffee that was "unreasonably dangerous" and "defectively manufactured". Previously, New Mexico had never found for a Plaintiff in a product liability suit. Two scheduled mediations were not attended by McDonald's. [15] McDonald's refused Morgan's offer to settle for $90,000. Morgan offered to settle for $300,000, and a mediator suggested $225,000 just before trial, but McDonald's refused these final pre-trial attempts to settle.

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    I was critizing the decisions of the courts thinking about who careless they could be to give a lady millions of dollars for something that she did herself. On top of the face that were was the common sense with this women not to be more careful with the coffee, already knowing that coffee would be hot. But I have to say that after watching the you tube video in class I have a very different view on the case. After viewing the court case video with all the acutall faces and exibits, I was able to better understand why the women sued McDonalds. When looking at the case, Mrs. Liebeck had a large amount of third degreen burns on her body that left here in the hospital racking up medical bills over 10 thousand dollars.…

    • 962 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Case Citation: Bratton et. al. v. McDonough 91 A. 3d 1050 (2014) Background of Case: This is a civil case. It was tried by jury on July 16, 2012 in the State of Maine Superior Court of Somerset County. The jury found for the defendant.…

    • 1250 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Case: Schulz v. Kroger Co.., 963 N.E. 2d 1141 (Ind. Ct. App. 2012) Facts: The Schulzes are appealing the trial court’s summary judgement in favor of Kroger Co., and their knowledge or the existence of any hazardous conditions in its store. Procedural History: Customer, Dixie Schulz allegedly slipped over clear liquid and fell, brought premisis-liability action against Kroger. The Hendricks Superior Court, Karen M. Love, J., granted Kroger’s motion for summary judgement.…

    • 550 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Durham v. McDonald’s Restaurants of Oklahoma, Inc. FACTS Camran Durham filed an intentional infliction of emotional distress lawsuit against his former employer, McDonald’s in Oklahoma. As he was denied three requests by McDonald’s manager which was his supervisor to take his prescription anti-seizure medication. After the denial of the last request the manager called him “f…ing retard”. Durham alleged that the refusals by the manager caused him to fear that he would suffer a seizure which made leave the work and not return. The federal court determined that the manager’s behavior was “not severe.”…

    • 254 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The United States Congress established a federal Bank of the United States through a legislative act. The federal Bank had created a branch for operation in the state of Maryland. According to Maryland laws, any bank within Maryland without a state charter will be imposed a tax by the Maryland state government, and the branch of the Bank of the United States is one of the non-chartered banks. McCullough, a cashier for the Second Bank of the United States, was operating in Maryland and issued banknotes without paying the tax. The State of Maryland sued McCullough for not paying the tax in an argument that the Bank was unconstitutional due to the lack of specification of the power to create a bank in the Constitution .…

    • 1152 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Baker V. Carr Case Study

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Q1 The main inquiry in Baker v. Carr was in the case of redistricting was a legitimate issue the courts could deliver proactively to revise manhandle or a political issue. The state contended that it was a political issue, so the courts had no purview. The case demonstrated a standout amongst the most debilitating in the Supreme Court's history, with the choice held over for re-contention on the grounds that the court couldn't achieve a lion's share choice. Equity Charles Evans Whittaker was so resentful about the case, he at long last recused himself from the choice, and the worry over the choice may have added to his initial retirement from the Court.…

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1. What was the legal issue in this case? What did the court decide? This case is based on Mr. Cortez, who worked for Sam's Club from 1986 to 2003. Mr. Cortez sued Sam's Club for discrimination in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, alleging that the company failed to promote him to general manager as he requested for several years.…

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Abbott v. Gould, Inc., 232 Neb. 907, 443 N.W.2d 591 (Neb. 1989) Facts: Several former employees and personal representatives (Plaintiffs) of Gould, Inc. (Defendant/Appellee), sued to recover damages against their former employer and Robert J. Fitzgibbons, Sr., M.D (Defendant) based on allegations that they were responsible for damages based on their conduct. The Defendant demurred in part, on the grounds that the district court lacked subject matter jurisdiction in the matter. The Defendant also operated a secondary lead refining and smelting plant. It is the Plaintiff’s belief that the Defendant knowingly misrepresented the facts to its employees, refusing to acknowledge that their work environment was reasonably safe.…

    • 528 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Burwell v. Hobby Lobby was a case between Sylvia Burwell, the secretary of Health and Human Services, and Hobby Lobby’s owners and founders. This case dealt with the issue of should Hobby Lobby be able to deny employees contraceptives on the health care provided for the workers by the business. This case was a case between workers’ healthcare and religious rights. This case gains attention and the Supreme Courts elect to hear it. They come to the decision that Hobby Lobby should be left their religious freedoms.…

    • 1461 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    James Hitesman was a registered nurse and shift supervisor at Bridgeway, Inc, nursing home. He displayed concerns to management about that amount of infectious diseases within the nursing home. He claimed that the incidents of infections were rising at a disturbing rate. The management did not take care of the situation as he desired. Therefore, he told a television reporter about the problems in this nursing home.…

    • 1276 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Many people believe that contraceptives should be required in employment based health care. In the Burwell vs. Hobby Lobby supreme court case, this is highlighted. This case is an important part of what’s going on in the U.S. today. This case gives people more freedom of religion, but takes away contraceptives that some people that need a job may not be able to afford. The most important points in this case are the background info, court process, and the Supreme Court Decision.…

    • 1035 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Supreme case McDonald v. Chicago was about several suites that were filed against Chicago and Oak Park in Illinois challenging their gun bans after the Supreme Court issued its opinion in District of Columbia v. Heller. Specifically In 1982 the City of Chicago adopted a handgun ban to combat crime and minimize handgun related deaths and injuries. Chicago’s law required anyone who wanted to own a handgun to register it. The registration process was complex. In practice, most Chicago residents were banned from possessing handguns.…

    • 586 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    McDonald vs Chicago is a five-to-four win for proponents of Second Amendment rights. This is the first case in over forty years to address the issue of whether the Bill of Rights is incorporated against the states. It's so important because it incorporates the Second Amendment right of individual gun ownership into the Fourteenth Amendment so that right will apply against the states. It will lead to legal challenges to other state and firearms regulations. And also confines judicially enforceable constitutional rights to only those rights that are deeply rooted in history and…

    • 94 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Why Is America Supersized

    • 1020 Words
    • 5 Pages

    America’s Supersized Problem For the past decade, obesity has been the attributed cause to the thousands of individuals who are suffering Type 2 diabetes. Many people have begun to address this problem with campaigns to promote awareness and healthy eating habits. On top of that, many have also filed lawsuits against a vast number of food companies such as McDonald’s and Burger King due to their lack of warnings about the harmful nutrients which come with the infamously low-priced meals. In an ideal world, everyone is able to eat what they want without having to worry about their weight.…

    • 1020 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    McDonald’s in the end loses when the case is brought to court. The city’s government has the right to increase even if it 's going to hurt other smaller…

    • 1421 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays