Argumentative Essay: Killing Animals For Food

Decent Essays
Register to read the introduction… After many sightings and reports of how people all over the world go through the process of killing these animals with their cruel and inhumane ways, people have decided in having their stand on the issue by abstaining from the consumption of animals in the hopes of discouraging the killing of animals for food. This act however, will not tackle the issue at all. People fail to realize that it is not the food industry or third-party suppliers of food that are to be blamed, but rather the specific individuals who commit such cruelty and inhumanity! Hence, what should be done is to punish the guilty and to set up laws which restrict the horrible acts of animal abuse. Abstinence from consuming animals will do no good to the issue at hand. People say that killing animals for food is inhumane and wrong. They say that animals should have the right to live free from being hunted and eaten by man since we the human race are blessed with the ability to make our choices based on reasoning and grace. However, it is undeniable that we need to eat meat to stay healthy. Hence, animals cannot be disregarded from a person’s

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Animal cruelty is one of the lowest qualities that humans have, being able to hurt innocent animals just to supply their hunger. Every second, 300 animals are killed in the USA alone. That number shows how America is being taken over by the meat industry. People have begun to turn vegan because they are embarrassed by the way humans treat animals. Vegans believe in animal rights because they are living, breathing beings that have feelings and emotions, just like humans.…

    • 735 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As the years fly by, so does humanity. Year after year, our species are embracing inhumane methods of producing food. Those creatures that cannot defend themselves, we attack or capture them and we slaughter them just for our pleasure. Slaughtering animals for consumption is acceptable, on account of, not everyone wants to be vegetarian. However, when decimating animals it should be done sympathetically or not at all.…

    • 1184 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Firstly, Animal-eating is a social practice that deeply embeds in the modern culture. Slavery, the oppression of women, and institutionalized racism also once had this status; however, few if any supposes that status is what makes practices morally right or wrong. Slavery, for example, is wrong because it requires the persistent exploitation, coercion and degrading of innocent people, but not because it is extinct in our society. The fact that practice has tradition on its side and a solid standing in certain cultures does not mean it carries any moral capacity.…

    • 1929 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Agriculture has been a significant aspect of humans lives since the beginning of time. Throughout the years farming has changed exceedingly for various reasons. In the passages “An Animal’s Place” by Michael Pollan and “The Omnivore’s Delusion: Against the Agri-intellectuals” by Blake Hurst, both the ethical and inferior sides of farming are explained and the differences in industrial and organic farming is discussed. Although the authors have different opinions of farming, both passages are beneficial in learning the in’s and out’s of farming.…

    • 926 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    If their lives have less value than that of humans, and their deaths would benefit humans, then killing and eating them is justified.1 The joy humans feel when eating meat outweighs the negatives of extinguishing of animal life, whether humane or not. My view on this issue closely aligns with those of Alastair Norcross, the author of “Puppies, Pigs and People: Eating Meat and Marginal Cases.” Eating meat that is the result of factory farming is morally wrong, and a moral person shouldn’t be taking pleasure from the products of torture.3 Almost no one can feign ignorance of the issues; videos of abuses have surfaced online, or been broadcasted through documentaries and by PETA, so anyone with access to social media or the Internet is aware that these methods of slaughter are not ethical. In the United States, the overabundance of food options and grocery stores indicates that we no longer need to hunt and gather to survive. Meat has become a luxury item since the vitamins and proteins it may provide us with can be gleaned from other sources.…

    • 1239 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Currently, the treatment of animals by humans is unjust. As a species, starting long ago, humans have killed animals and have eaten their meat as a means of survival. In recent years, however, the desire for meat has come to the point where animals are being forcefully strangled to death and are being genetically manipulated to quickly grow and die. The people who have killed those animals may have had good intentions––to supply food to consumers––but the food was…

    • 1054 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Pollan distinguishes between “animal welfare’ and ‘animal rights”, by suggesting that people who care about animals should be working to ensure that the animals people are slaughtering for consumption do not suffer in their death, and make sure its swift and painless (Dilemma328). Continuing to eat meat will become more tolerable in time if there is transparency. It is the best way to ensure that animals that are being slaughtered for consumption is done in a manner that people can abide by (Dilemma 331). There is no evidence that farm animals suffer any less than family pets, and they too are intelligent, and have individual personalities and social emotional…

    • 1634 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In the 2014 British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) article, “Ethics Guide: Eating Animals,” it examines three different ethical perspectives – the rights argument, the consequential (utilitarian) argument, and the virtue argument – against the rearing and killing of animals for human consumption in layman’s terms primarily for the average contemporary reader in Anglo-American societies (such as Canada, the United States and the United Kingdom). Furthermore, the BBC, a leading worldwide media corporation, contends that the process of rearing, killing and eating animals is “morally wrong” or unjustifiable because these acts disregard the rights of the animal to live by its own interests. Its aim is to inform the reader of these perspectives so…

    • 1545 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Vegetarians protest and fight the meat industry,” in most cases this is not true; however, it is commonly assumed. Many vegetarians are people who are trying to live a healthier lifestyle or people who just disagree with how meat is commonly processed. Although intentions are good skeptics and veggie lovers alike have their concerns with this dietary practice. The most notable concern is that of potential health risks . The benefits and risks of this way of life has raised many eyebrows over the years.…

    • 1039 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Animal cruelty has always been a challenge that gets overlooked by society in the food market. Many people do not take into consideration the life of the cow, chicken, or pig, and lots of other animals, while enjoying their juicy hamburger, chicken leg, and bacon. “An Animal’s Place” by Michael Pollan argues about animal liberation while using support from Peter Singer’s “Animal Liberation” book. Peter Singer is pro animal rights and has converted lots and outs of people over to vegetarianism, while Michael Pollan loves steak and seeks to see if Singer could convert him as well. Our world changes consistently with the trends of our society, from the civil rights movements of blacks and women, to the legalization of gay marriage.…

    • 1046 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One of the major theories in philosophy is utilitarianism, which strives for producing the most amount of happiness. The utilitarian approach is based on the simple doctrine that if an action is ethical and it brings happiness to an individual or a group of people without causing pain, then it is acceptable. One of the main emphasis of utilitarianism is animal rights. It primarily focuses on the treatment of animals and how they should be treated more humanely. The paper will discuss utilitarian’s beliefs and whether they require people to stop eating animals and experimenting on them.…

    • 1122 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    This essay’s objective is to present both sides of the issue, allowing the reader to further investigate and form their own ethical stance for or against animal rights. For many, it is…

    • 1264 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Name: Lily Date: Endangered Animals How would you feel if animals were staring at you as you sat in a small cage? That’s how animals feel in zoo’s. Some people think zoos aren’t prisons I think critters should be saved from animal prisons or zoos.…

    • 597 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Animal Welfare Essay

    • 818 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In the world today, people cannot do without animals because they have become an essential part of human existence to both vegetarians and meat eaters. Some animals serve as pet, and some serve as food, and others are used for sports and laboratory experiments. Although some animal activist advocates for animal rights, there are limits to that right because animals cannot be equal with human. They don’t have the intellectual ability that humans have to take responsibilities and control what happens around them. These animals are important in the society and the need to treat them with respect is paramount.…

    • 818 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Ethical Argument In Animal Welfare

    • 1672 Words
    • 7 Pages
    • 10 Works Cited

    Many show that a major issue in animal welfare should be solved by vegetarianism and not torture animals to get their meat. As Freeman argues, “animals used for food in the United States are commonly treated like unfeeling tools of production, rather than living, feeling animals,” (Freeman 170). Many feel the need to reduce meat because of animal cruelty, and not because of the welfare of the…

    • 1672 Words
    • 7 Pages
    • 10 Works Cited
    Great Essays

Related Topics