Keller Cpas: A Case Study

Decent Essays
Keller CPAs will have to execute the ensuing to acquire evidence about obtainable legal hindrances by:
• Performing analytical procedures
• Verifying current year acquisitions
• Verifying current year disposals
• Verifying the ending balance in the asset account
• Verifying depreciation expense
• Verifying the ending balance in accumulated depreciation
These processes intend to evaluate whether encumbrances and liens to the property, plant and equipment have been acknowledged and whether property presently promised as security on a loan that has not been sold or damaged.

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Contacting Silverthorne Attorneys is a Wise Choice Once you decide to stay local and pursue “DHS” legal counsel to help you with your path of recuperation and financial recovery, you should discuss your damages with a few different legal teams. You want to feel very comfortable with with the team you hire as further communication is extremely important. The team of professional lawyers, paralegals, and staff, plus hired experts and investigators here at Silverthorne Attorneys will overwhelmingly convince you that we should be the unwavering advocates for you and your case. Contact us today, cost-free, so an injury attorney can evaluate your unfortunate experience and begin a positive, expedient journey to recovery. When we are hired, and…

    • 202 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    CILA Case Summary

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages

    We intend to defend this case by arguing that Support Systems and Services did not violate any of the provisions of the CILA Act nor the Mental Health and Developmental Disabilities Code. Specifically, we will present a defense that the insured is not guilty of neglect in that it did not have notice that there was a risk that Elise Wasson may fall from a chair. Further, we will present a case that the delay reporting the occurrence and, therefore, the delay in obtaining medical treatment, did not cause an increase in Elise’s injuries and damages. Based on the information that we have at this time, we do not believe that the insured is liable for failing to take precautionary measures in an attempt to prevent Elise from falling from the kitchen chair.…

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Patrece Peterson Case

    • 1231 Words
    • 5 Pages

    COMPLAINT Patrece Petersen, a defendant, who was prosecuted by Laura Marshard of the Cape and Islands District Attorney’s Office, sent a complaint on October 20, 2014, alleging that Marshard met privately with a witness in Petersen’s criminal case, after the witness had been assigned counsel due to a potential 5th Amendment issue (Dkt# 1435CR000551). As a result of this complaint, the office has received information from, Judge Chin, regarding other instances of misconduct by Marshard. Marshard has allegedly violated Mass.R.Prof. C.3.8 (d). FACTS…

    • 1231 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Merritt Vs Dillard

    • 142 Words
    • 1 Pages

    The Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals reviews a grant of summary judgment de novo, “using the same legal standard as the district court.” Merritt v. Dillard Paper Co., 120 F.3d 1181, 1184 (11th Cir. 1997). To win on a motion for summary judgment, the movant only needs to show that there is no genuine dispute of material fact and that they are entitled to a judgment as a matter of law. Fed. R. Civ.…

    • 142 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Before this investigation on Wednesday, 12/16/2015, we met with Mr. Joseph R. Conzonire, the President and Owner of The Hat Restaurant’s 11 locations throughout the counties of Los Angeles, Riverside, Orange, Ventura and San Bernardino. We explained our objective and approach for obtaining statements from his employees. Mr. Conzonire stepped into the conversation with Ms. Yu and Ms. Larios and insisted that were not legally bound to obtain their recorded statements. He stated that we were not practicing attorney’s and that the meeting with Ms. Yu and Larios was not being done in a court of law. He instructed Ms. Yu and Ms. Larios, in front of this Investigator, not to sign any documentation if asked to do so by the Investigator.…

    • 225 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Synopsis: Garrity v. New Jersey (1967) was the result of an investigation into alleged “ticket fixing”. The case initially involved five police officers and one civilian employee from different boroughs of New Jersey who were suspected of alleged “ticket fixing” and diverting funds to other programs. The state Attorney General ordered an investigation into the allegations and the five officers were convicted of conspiracy to obstruct the administration of the traffic laws. They appealed the court’s decision to the New Jersey State Supreme Court, which upheld the conviction. They then appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court citing that they were coerced and their statements were not given voluntarily due to the threat of losing their positions.…

    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The author has been tasked with reviewing a suit against Widget Corporation and determining the procedural and substantive legal proceedings. This paper will review the merits of the case brought against Widget Corporation and suggest various courses of action for dealing with the lawsuit. The author will review two areas of law by which a case can be brought – contract and tort law. The author will reference the Universal Commercial Code as well as US tort law to present various arguments and counter arguments that will allow Widget Corporation to best defend itself against the lawsuit. Procedural Law…

    • 262 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Under New York Penal Law, false statements or failure to disclose material facts may result in denial of an application to the bar. William Gould admits to withholding information on his application for admission to the New York State Bar, and has no intention of remedying these omissions. Given that Mr. Gould has left important information from his bar application, is he likely to be admitted to practice law in the state of New York? 2.…

    • 2326 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The Pursuer fails to put forth relevant averments in relation to the alleged solicitation carried out by the Defender. The Pursuers fails to provide a reasonable explanation for believing that the Defender intends to solicit as there are no averments to state why the Pursuer believes that the Defender intends to solicit clients and employees. No specification is provided as to the basis on which the Pursuer avers to know what the Defenders intentions are.…

    • 75 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When faced with ineffective assistance of counsel it is impossible for a defendant to knowingly abandon a right or privilege, whose existence he does not truly understand exists. Here, if a defendant does not know that they are victims of ineffective assistance of counsel then a Rule 11 colloquy does not assist the defendants in their understanding of whether they attained effective legal representation. For example, the transcript of the Rule 11 hearing shows that the Court never asked whether the brothers understood effective versus ineffective assistance of counsel; whether they understood reasonable diligence in legal representation; whether they understood the actual work expected of attorneys in CCE and money laundering cases and against…

    • 636 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Currently the world witnesses a very dynamic, aircraft manufacturing industry, which invests billions and billions in its projects, due to tough market competitors. In order to achieve their goal and objectives, any project requires an efficient management. However, due to a diversity of issues, goals are not always achieved nor targets are met. During the 21st century, the aircraft manufacturing industry was leaded in the world by two major’s commercial jet manufacturers, namely Boeing and Airbus.…

    • 2435 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ernst & Young LLP was founded in 1894 and its located in New York, New York with additional offices in the United States, Middle East, Australia, Europe, and Asia. It specializes in providing auditing, assurance, technology and security risk, enterprise risk management, transaction support, merger, and acquisition, actuarial and real estate advisory services as well as many other services. The company the company in the scandal was Weatherford International is one of the biggest multinational oil and natural gas service companies. It provides varies services and products such as for drilling, evaluation, completion, production and intervention of oil and natural gas wells.…

    • 1013 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    An auditor should ensure that they assess the clients’ financial statement by conforming to existence, rights an obligation, completeness, valuation and presentation and…

    • 1475 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Case: Katzenbach v. Grant 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 46756 *; 2005 WL 1378976 Facts: The Plaintiffs, Katzenbach and Osuna filed a lawsuit against Defendant Grant over a film and book rights. Grant owns a website called “thenightexposed” (www.thenightexposed.net). The Plaintiffs claim that Grant caused problems with negotiations with Sony Pictures and the USA Network. Plaintiff further claims that Grant sent a letter calling Osuna book a fake and made other defamatory articulations about the Plaintiffs on his website.…

    • 1106 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dog Bite Statute

    • 1170 Words
    • 5 Pages

    QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether the court will reject the motion filed by the defendant to dismiss the claims of our client? BRIEF ANSWER: probably not. The defendant Mr Androcles’s motion to dismiss our client’s complaint may not succeed because all the elements envisaged in the ‘Dog bite statute’ are fulfilled. Firstly, the injury caused by the dog to Harvey in response to the throwing the snowball was severe and unproportional in nature. Secondly, there was no provocation as the response of the dog was not proportional or justifiable under ordinary discourse.…

    • 1170 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays